Find { a 1 , … , a k } ⊆ { 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 } ∑ a 1 ⋯ a k 1 , where the sum is over all nonempty subsets of of the set { 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 } .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
W e d e f i n e ∑ a 1 a 2 a 3 . . . . . a k a s t h e s u m o f { a n } t a k e n k a t a t i m e . W e n e e d t o e v a l u a t e S = ∑ a 1 1 + ∑ a 1 a 2 1 + ∑ a 1 a 2 a 3 1 + ∑ a 1 a 2 a 3 a 4 1 + a 1 a 2 a 3 a 4 a 5 1 , { a n } = { 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 } N o w S = a 1 a 2 a 3 a 4 a 5 ∑ a 1 + ∑ a 1 a 2 + ∑ a 1 a 2 a 3 + ∑ a 1 a 2 a 3 a 4 + 1 = a 1 a 2 a 3 a 4 a 5 ( 1 + a 1 ) ( 1 + a 2 ) ( 1 + a 3 ) ( 1 + a 4 ) ( 1 + a 5 ) − a 1 a 2 a 3 a 4 a 5 = 5 ! 6 ! − 5 ! = 5
This summation can be written as ...... [1+(1/1]×[1+(1/2)].............. ×[1+(1/5)]-1
Let x be the value of the summation. Let a n = S = a 1 , a 2 , . . . , a k ⊆ 1 , 2 , . . . , 5 , ∣ S ∣ = n ∑ a 1 a 2 . . . a k .
It is easy to simplify that x = a 5 a 4 + a 3 + a 2 + a 1 + 1 with a 5 = 1 2 0 .
It is easy to obtain a 4 + a 3 + . . . + a 1 + 1 = ( 1 + 1 ) ( 2 + 1 ) ( 3 + 1 ) ( 4 + 1 ) ( 5 + 1 ) − 5 ! = 6 0 0 .
Thus we have x = 1 2 0 6 0 0 = 5 .
I am failing to understand what you are saying.
Please avoid letting your notation do double duty. I don't understand why a 5 ∈ { 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 } yields a 5 = 1 2 0 .
Please explain your 3rd line more clearly @Billy Sugiarto ....... I find it interesting
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
We can prove the more general result
{ a 1 , … , a k } ⊆ { 1 , 2 , … , n } ∑ a 1 ⋯ a k 1 = n
by mathematical induction.
It is easy to prove that the statement holds for n = 1.
Now suppose that it holds for n = p. On moving from p to (p + 1) we must consider all the subsets which do not include (p + 1) (let's call them the old subsets) plus the new subsets which will include the element (p + 1).
The old subsets are identical to those in the case when n = p. We know from the induction hypothesis that these old subsets contribute p to the new sum.
The new subsets include the set with the single element (p + 1), which contributes p + 1 1 to the new sum.
The rest of the new subsets will consist of one of the old subsets with the addition of the element (p+1). Their total contribution to the new sum will be p + 1 1 times the old sum (which is p by hypothesis)
Combining these three sorts of terms in the new sum we get the total sum for n = p+1 -
p + p + 1 1 + p + 1 p = p + p + 1 p + 1 = p + 1 as we had hoped.
Noting that the hypothesis holds for n = 1, we can now invoke the principle of mathematical induction to prove the general case, and then the special result for n = 5 is rather easy!