Powers of 101

Algebra Level 3

The first few powers of 101 all begin with 1, as highlighted by red colors below: 10 1 1 = 1 01 10 1 2 = 1 0201 10 1 3 = 1 030301 10 1 4 = 1 04060401 . \begin{aligned} 101^1 &=& {\color{#D61F06}{1}}01 \\ 101^2 &=& {\color{#D61F06}{1}}0201 \\ 101^3 &=& {\color{#D61F06}{1}}030301 \\ 101^4 &=& {\color{#D61F06}{1}}04060401 \\ &\vdots.& \end{aligned} Is that always the case for all powers of 101?

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

10 solutions

Consider

10 1 100 = ( 1 0 2 + 1 ) 100 = 1 0 200 + 100 × 1 0 198 + 4950 × 1 0 196 + . . . + 1 = 1 0 200 + 1 0 200 + 0.4950 × 1 0 200 + . . . + 1 = 2.4950 × 1 0 200 + . . . + 1 \begin{aligned} 101^{100} & = (10^2+1)^{100} \\ & = 10^{200} + 100 \times 10^{198} + 4950 \times 10^{196} + ... + 1 \\ & = 10^{200} + 10^{200} + 0.4950 \times 10^{200} + ... + 1 \\ & = 2.4950 \times 10^{200} + ... + 1 \end{aligned} .

Therefore, 10 1 100 101^{100} does not begin with 1. No , the powers of 101 do not always begins with 1.

From a program, the beginning digit for respective n n is as follows:

Range of n Beginning digit 1 n 69 1 70 n 110 2 111 n 139 3 140 n 161 4 162 n 180 5 181 n 195 6 196 n 208 7 209 n 220 8 221 n 231 9 232 n 301 1 \begin{array} {cc} \text{Range of }n & \text{Beginning digit} \\ 1 \le n \le 69 & 1 \\ 70 \le n \le 110 & 2 \\ 111 \le n \le 139 & 3 \\ 140 \le n \le 161 & 4 \\ 162 \le n \le 180 & 5 \\ 181 \le n \le 195 & 6 \\ 196 \le n \le 208 & 7 \\ 209 \le n \le 220 & 8 \\ 221 \le n \le 231 & 9 \\ 232 \le n \le 301 & 1 \end{array}

Great! An easier way to determine the starting digit would be to look at the fractional part of n log 101 n \log 101 .

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years ago

Funny thing is right... Hehe :3, I actually meant to press No...

GimmeSOmar Omar - 3 years, 11 months ago

I believe Napier first worked out logarithms by calculating powers of 1.0001.

Guy Benians - 3 years, 11 months ago

Sir Impressive solution but we can simply find out by if we put 101^0

Biswajit Barik - 3 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

What is 10 1 0 101^0 ? Does it start with 1?

Calvin Lin Staff - 3 years, 11 months ago
Tristan Chaang
Jun 12, 2017

Observe the pattern:

10 1 1 = 01 01 101^1 = 01|| 01

10 1 2 = 01 02 01 101^2 = 01|| 02|| 01

10 1 3 = 01 03 03 01 101^3 = 01|| 03|| 03|| 01

10 1 4 = 01 04 06 04 01 101^4 = 01|| 04 ||06|| 04|| 01

10 1 5 = 01 05 10 10 05 01 101^5 = 01|| 05 ||10 ||10|| 05|| 01

. . . ...

In general, for all positive integers n, 10 1 n 101^n is written as

C 0 n C 1 n C 2 n . . . C n 1 n C n n C^n_0 C^n_1 C^n_2 ... C^n_{n-1} C^n_n

each every two digits, from left to right.

When n = 100, C 1 n C^n_1 is a three-digit number and carries a digit to 1, making the first digit 2.

10 1 100 ∴ 101^{100} starts with 2 instead of 1.

Moderator note:

To illustrate a little better why the pattern occurs, consider multiplying by 101 with long multiplication:

Multiplying x × 101 x \times 101 is equivalent to adding x + 100 x . x + 100x .

This ends up essentially forming a series of two-digit additions; it is obvious at x = 100 x = 100 there must be an overflow.

Interesting pattern, never thought of it this way before.

Christopher Boo - 3 years, 12 months ago

I knew its

Biswajit Barik - 3 years, 11 months ago

Indeed, because of carries from lower places, the 1st digit will become 2 at 101^70.

Jerry Barrington - 3 years, 9 months ago
Raphael Million
Jun 12, 2017

Without computing many values, we can figure this out with logarithms. Because we use the base-10 representation of numbers we can take the base-10 log to know the first digit of a number. Obeserve that the log of a pure power of 10 is always an integer number and if the number is close to a power of 10 it is also almost a whole number. For example l o g 10 ( 11 ) = 1.041392 log_{10}(11)=1.041392 But as soon as the first digit changes to something more than 1 the decimal part of the logarithm becomes greater than l o g 10 ( 2 ) = 0.3010 log_{10}(2)=0.3010 . We can see why that is by "splitting" a number: l o g 10 ( 200 ) = l o g 10 ( 2 100 ) = 2 + l o g 10 ( 2 ) log_{10}(200)=log_{10}(2*100)=2+log_{10}(2) Because every number less than 10 is less than 1 after applying the base-10 log we can conclude that this relates to the decimal part of the number. l o g 10 ( 10 1 n ) = n l o g 10 ( 101 ) log_{10}(101^{n})=n*log_{10}(101) We can already see that the first digit will be greater than 1 eventually, because l o g 10 ( 101 ) log_{10}(101) is not an integer, thus multiplying it with a sufficiently large number will make its decimal part greater than l o g 10 ( 2 ) = 0.3010 log_{10}(2)=0.3010

THis is indeed a smart way to see that the first digit definitely goes up beyond 1.

Agnishom Chattopadhyay - 3 years, 12 months ago
Bryce Bullock
Jun 13, 2017

Another way of phrasing this problem is: Does 10 1 n = ( 1.01 × 100 ) n = 10 0 n × 1.0 1 n 101^{n}=(1.01 \times 100)^{n}=100^{n} \times 1.01^{n} have it's first digit not start with a 1? In other words, we can ignore the 10 0 n 100^{n} term and reduce the question to can 1.0 1 n 1.01^{n} start with a digit other than 1 for some integer n n . Clearly the limit of 1.0 1 n 1.01^n goes to infinity, and so will not always have a first digit of 1. For instance for n n =100 1.0 1 n 1.01^{n} evaluates to approximately 2.7.

That's a nice way to interpret this question in terms of limits.

Like most other people, I did the whole "logarithms and inequalities" approach.

Pi Han Goh - 3 years, 11 months ago
Uffe Jensen
Jun 14, 2017

Consider the powers of 1.01.

There is no upper bound on 1.01^n. We can therefore find a value for n, which gives 1.01^n = 3

This is equivalent to a power of 101 beginning with 3 (or any other digit).

Igors Dubanevics
Jun 16, 2017

In this case, we could use Binomial theorem . We should represent 101 as a sum 100 + 1 100 + 1 . Therefore:

( 100 + 1 ) n = 10 0 n + C 1 n 10 0 n 1 1 1 + C 2 n 10 0 n 2 1 2 + C 3 n 10 0 n 3 1 3 + . . . (100+1)^n =100^n+C_1^n 100^{n-1} 1^1 + C_2^n 100^{n-2} 1^2+C_3^n 100^{n-3} 1^3+...

First term will dominate in the beginning. It will determine what is the first digit of the number. Second term could influence the first digit, but it could not reach such heights because it lacks one power of 100. However, as n n becomes greater, so C n 1 C_n^1 increase and eventually it will reach magic number 100 or higher. We could attempt to calculate after which power first digit will change from 1 to 2:

C n 1 = n ! n 1 ! 1 ! = n 1 ! n n 1 ! 1 ! = n 1 ! = n = 100 C_n^1 =\frac{n!}{n-1!1!}=\frac{n-1!n}{n-1!1!}=\frac{n}{1!}=n=100

However, it is underestimation, because we do not include consequent terms. Thus, greater n n , greater influence of a consequente terms on a first digit.

Arjen Vreugdenhil
Jun 12, 2017

The power can be written as k = 0 n ( n k ) 1 0 2 k . \sum_{k = 0}^n \left(\begin{array}{c} n \\ k \end{array}\right) 10^{2k}. The first digit would be the coefficient of 1 0 2 n 10^{2n} , which is 1, unless there is carry from terms farther down the line.

The last example where there is no carry over in the sum at all is 10 1 8 = 10828567056280801. 101^8 = 10828567056280801. After that comes 10 1 9 = 1093685272684360901 , 101^9 = 1093685272684360901, where the coefficients of 1 0 4 10^4 and 1 0 5 10^5 are equal to 126.

We will certainly have carry over to the first digit if the second coefficient is 100 or greater. Thus

10 1 100 = + 100 1 0 198 + 1 1 0 200 = + 2 1 0 200 . 101^{100} = \cdots + 100\cdot 10^{198} + 1\cdot 10^{200} = \cdots + 2\cdot 10^{200}.

Madhur Agrawal
Jun 16, 2017

Assuming the pattern continues, as it should (and does), the has to come a point where digits must be carried over. This will come sooner in some base systems, and later in others, but it must come

Why must there be a carry over? What evidence do you have to support this claim?

Pi Han Goh - 3 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

As the pattern keeps growing, the numbers must grow larger than 10 (or whatever base you're doing this in), and hence, a digit must be carried over, breaking the chain. Do you see?

Madhur Agrawal - 3 years, 8 months ago

If you look at the numbers the question gives us,

= 101 = 10201 = 1030301 = 104060401

You can see that the numbers in the 3rd column are increasing consistently by one, (1,2,3,4) so eventually they will go up to 9, and then 10, and then the 2nd column which was all zeros before, will be ones, and then eventually the second column too will add up and up (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) and then the first column will have a 2 in it..... and then eventually a 3 and a 4 and a.... anyways no not all powers of 101 will begin with one.

101 10201 1030301 10460401 There is a pattern which is the third digit from the left. The number goes up in 1 therefore at some point the first digit will be two.

Why "at some point the first digit will be two"? Why can't it remain 1 forever (even if the third digit from the left increases)?

Pi Han Goh - 3 years, 11 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...