Primality of Second Smallest Divisor

  • Divisors of 2 2 in increasing order: 1 , 2 1, {\color{#20A900} 2} . The second divisor is a prime.

  • Divisors of 3 3 in increasing order: 1 , 3 1, {\color{#20A900} 3} . The second divisor is a prime.

  • Divisors of 4 4 in increasing order: 1 , 2 , 4 1, {\color{#20A900} 2}, 4 . The second divisor is a prime.

What can we say about the following CONJECTURE supported by the three observations above?

The second smallest divisor of a positive integer n > 1 n>1 is a prime number.

True for NOT Every n n , but True for Infinitely Many n n True for Every n n True for NOT Every n n , but True for Finitely Many n n

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

Let d d be the 'second' divisor of n n , which means, there is no integer m m with 1 < m < d 1<m<d that m n m | n .

Now, d d must be a prime; otherwise we can find such an m m . If d d is not a prime, then there is at least one integer x x with 1 < x < d 1<x<d that x d x | d . As x d x | d and d n d | n , so we have, x n x | n with 1 < x < d 1<x<d ; which makes x x a fine m m .

So, the conjecture is True for Every n \boxed{\text{True for Every } n} .

MegaMoh .
May 23, 2019

Given { 1 , b , c , d , e N 1, b, c, d, e\ldots N } are the factors of N N in increasing order from 1 1 to N N .

Assume b b is not a prime, then it can be factored into f 1 f 2 f 3 f_1 \cdot f_2 \cdot f_3 \cdot \ldots which all must be smaller than b b . So taking the multiple of b b that gives N N , call it q q (meaning N b = q \frac{N}{b}=q ), then f 1 b q f 1 = f 1 f 1 f 2 f 3 q f 1 = N f_1\cdot\frac{b\cdot q}{f_1}=f_1\cdot \frac{f_1 \cdot f_2 \cdot f_3 \cdot \ldots \cdot q}{f_1}=N so f 1 f_1 is a factor of N N smaller than b b which contradicts our claim that the non-prime number b b is the second smallest factor so it must be prime .

Piero Sarti
Jan 2, 2018

Let the divisors of n n be written in ascending order. Such that n : 1 , x , . . . n: 1, {\color{#D61F06}x}, ... where x {\color{#D61F06}x} is not a prime number.

It follows that, due to the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, x x can be written as a unique product of primes which are necessarily smaller than x x .

We can rewrite the ordered list of the divisors of n n which includes the prime factors of x x and therefore if the divisors of any integer are listed in ascending order, the second divisor in the list will be prime.

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...