Take some time to read the statements below.
[ 1 ] . It is impossible for p , p + 2 and p + 4 to be all prime numbers where p is a prime number greater than 3 .
[ 2 ] . It is possible for both 8 p − 1 and 8 p + 1 to be prime when p is a prime number.
[ 3 ] . If p is a prime greater than 3 , then p 2 − 1 is always divisible by 1 2
Which of these statements are true?
Note : This problem is a part of the set "I Don't Have a Good Name For This Yet". See the rest of the problems here . And when I say I don't have a good name for this yet, I mean it. If you like problems like these and have a cool name for this set, feel free to comment here .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
In fact, p 2 − 1 is divisible by 2 4 for all primes p ≥ 5 . This implies divisibility by 1 2 but it is a stronger statement.
Cool solution.
can you please give a proof for the third statement, i love to collect data on primes ........ thanks:)
Log in to reply
just straightforward method :) ,thus try all number 6k+n n=1,2,3,4,5,0
I think this will help you to understand , (p-1)(p+1) where p is odd number(prime)
(p-1) and (p+1) are both even as p is odd ( for p > 3), so 4| p 2 -1. Now 3 divides a product of 3 consecutive numbers, but 3 doesn't divide p , so it divides one of (p-1) or (p+1). Hence 12 | p 2 -1
p ≡ 1 , 2 ( m o d 3 ) . If p ≡ 1 ( m o d 3 ) then p + 2 ≡ 0 ( m o d 3 ) . Again if p ≡ 2 ( m o d 3 ) then p + 4 ≡ 0 ( m o d 3 ) . So all of p , p + 2 , p + 4 can't be primes.
Same logic as above. Checking both residues modulo 3 shows that both can't be primes simultaneously.
p ≡ ± 1 ( m o d 3 , 4 ) ⟹ p 2 − 1 ≡ 1 − 1 = 0 ( m o d 3 , 4 ) . So 1 2 ∣ p 2 − 1 .
Hence, 1 and 3 are true.
This should be a comment, not a solution.
Bengali! wow! :)
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Let's consider the statements one by one.
Is [ 1 ] true? Yes, it is.
If p is a prime greater than 3 , then either it is of the form 3 k + 1 , or it is of the form 3 k − 1 where k is a positive integer.
If p = 3 k + 1 , then p + 2 is divisible by 3 .
If p = 3 k − 1 , then p + 4 is divisible by 3 . So, it is impossible for all of them to be prime if p > 3 .
The statement [ 2 ] isn't true for p = 2 , 3 .
If p > 3 , then either p = 3 k + 1 or p = 3 k − 1 where k is a positive integer.
If p = 3 k + 1 , then 8 p + 1 = 2 4 k + 9 which is divisible by 3 .
If p = 3 k − 1 , then 8 p − 1 = 2 4 k − 9 which is divisible by 3 . So, it is impossible for both 8 p − 1 and 8 p + 1 to be prime. [ 2 ] isn't true.
[ 3 ] is true. Any prime number greater than 3 is of the form 6 k ± 1 . So, p 2 − 1 = 3 6 k 2 ± 1 2 k which is divisible by 1 2 .
So, our final answer is [ 1 ] and [ 3 ] .