Prime Problem

Take some time to read the statements below.

[ 1 ] [1] . It is impossible for p p , p + 2 p+2 and p + 4 p+4 to be all prime numbers where p p is a prime number greater than 3 3 .

[ 2 ] [2] . It is possible for both 8 p 1 8p-1 and 8 p + 1 8p+1 to be prime when p p is a prime number.

[ 3 ] [3] . If p p is a prime greater than 3 3 , then p 2 1 p^2-1 is always divisible by 12 12

Which of these statements are true?

Note : This problem is a part of the set "I Don't Have a Good Name For This Yet". See the rest of the problems here . And when I say I don't have a good name for this yet, I mean it. If you like problems like these and have a cool name for this set, feel free to comment here .

[ 1 ] [1] and [ 2 ] [2] [ 1 ] [1] [ 1 ] [1] , [ 2 ] [2] and [ 3 ] [3] [ 1 ] [1] and [ 3 ] [3]

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

Mursalin Habib
Apr 9, 2014

Let's consider the statements one by one.

Is [ 1 ] [1] true? Yes, it is.

If p p is a prime greater than 3 3 , then either it is of the form 3 k + 1 3k+1 , or it is of the form 3 k 1 3k-1 where k k is a positive integer.

If p = 3 k + 1 p=3k+1 , then p + 2 p+2 is divisible by 3 3 .

If p = 3 k 1 p=3k-1 , then p + 4 p+4 is divisible by 3 3 . So, it is impossible for all of them to be prime if p > 3 p>3 .

The statement [ 2 ] [2] isn't true for p = 2 , 3 p=2, 3 .

If p > 3 p>3 , then either p = 3 k + 1 p=3k+1 or p = 3 k 1 p=3k-1 where k k is a positive integer.

If p = 3 k + 1 p=3k+1 , then 8 p + 1 = 24 k + 9 8p+1=24k+9 which is divisible by 3 3 .

If p = 3 k 1 p=3k-1 , then 8 p 1 = 24 k 9 8p-1=24k-9 which is divisible by 3 3 . So, it is impossible for both 8 p 1 8p-1 and 8 p + 1 8p+1 to be prime. [ 2 ] [2] isn't true.

[ 3 ] [3] is true. Any prime number greater than 3 3 is of the form 6 k ± 1 6k\pm 1 . So, p 2 1 = 36 k 2 ± 12 k p^2-1=36k^2\pm12k which is divisible by 12 12 .

So, our final answer is [ 1 ] [1] and [ 3 ] [3] .

In fact, p 2 1 p^{2}-1 is divisible by 24 24 for all primes p 5 p \geq 5 . This implies divisibility by 12 12 but it is a stronger statement.

Caleb Townsend - 6 years, 4 months ago

Cool solution.

Soham Dibyachintan - 7 years, 2 months ago

can you please give a proof for the third statement, i love to collect data on primes ........ thanks:)

Abhinav Raichur - 6 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

just straightforward method :) ,thus try all number 6k+n n=1,2,3,4,5,0

Alexander Freeman - 6 years, 10 months ago

I think this will help you to understand , (p-1)(p+1) where p is odd number(prime)

U Z - 6 years, 5 months ago

(p-1) and (p+1) are both even as p is odd ( for p > 3), so 4| p 2 p^{2} -1. Now 3 divides a product of 3 consecutive numbers, but 3 doesn't divide p {p} , so it divides one of (p-1) or (p+1). Hence 12 | p 2 p^{2} -1

Curtis Clement - 6 years, 5 months ago
Jubayer Nirjhor
May 3, 2014
  1. p 1 , 2 ( m o d 3 ) p\equiv 1,2 \pmod{3} . If p 1 ( m o d 3 ) p\equiv 1\pmod3 then p + 2 0 ( m o d 3 ) p+2\equiv 0 \pmod3 . Again if p 2 ( m o d 3 ) p\equiv 2\pmod 3 then p + 4 0 ( m o d 3 ) p+4\equiv 0\pmod 3 . So all of p , p + 2 , p + 4 p,p+2,p+4 can't be primes.

  2. Same logic as above. Checking both residues modulo 3 3 shows that both can't be primes simultaneously.

  3. p ± 1 ( m o d 3 , 4 ) p 2 1 1 1 = 0 ( m o d 3 , 4 ) p\equiv \pm1\pmod {3,4}\Longrightarrow ~p^2-1\equiv 1-1=0\pmod {3,4} . So 12 p 2 1 12\mid p^2-1 .

Hence, 1 and 3 are true.

Tahsin Ahmed
Apr 11, 2014

এটা লেভেল ২ এর হওয়া উচিত.

This should be a comment, not a solution.

Mursalin Habib - 7 years, 1 month ago

Bengali! wow! :)

Sagnik Saha - 7 years, 1 month ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...