This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Easier Method is to check its last digit which is 5.
That is an incorrect identity; the correct one is a n + 1 + b n + 1 = ( a + b ) ( a n − a n − 1 b + a n − 2 b 2 − … + b n ) .
EDIT: Fixed exponents.
Log in to reply
As you may have already spotted yourself even your identity is wrong in that it should be a n + b n = ( a + b ) ( a n − 1 − a n − 2 b + a n − 3 b 2 − … + b n − 1 )
2^1=2 2^2=4 2^3=8 2^4=16 Then 32 (2 again)(it returns to beginning per 4) So; the biggest number dividing 4 in x<50, is 48, so 2 remains. We need to take 2 power of 2 and this gives us the first grade number in 2^50 = 4 If we go to beginning, 4+1 =5 divides 5 Clearly total amount is not a prime number
Log in to reply
That's the way I did it. Great job. This way, you don't have to worry about copying down an identity incorrectly.
sound logic but poor language mrs it to some extent
This is the better solution, because it takes the path of least resistance to the correct answer.
I pressed the wrong button by mistake :( any ways, here's a bonus question
bonus: Can you tell which number divides 2 5 0 + 1 ?
Log in to reply
5 is a factor for all factors of 2^(4n+2) + 1 where n is an integer 0 or greater. In this case n is 12.
Using my product below 2 2 5 + 2 1 3 + 1 = 1 2 5 × 2 6 8 5 0 1 , and 2 2 5 − 2 1 3 + 1 = 4 1 × 1 0 1 × 8 1 0 1
How is it clear from last statement that it's not a prime number?
Log in to reply
Because a prime number only has itself and 1 as factors - if this were how the # were constructed it couldn't be prime. (It should have been said to be more clear).
n must be odd. However, 50 is even.
Also, it is easy to work it to 0 mod 5, so is divisible by 5.
Bhai mujy is ki smj nai i
Log in to reply
Please speak in English. Translation: I didn't understand this.
That is not a correct analogy. 2^4 + 1 = 2^4 +1^4 = 17 which is prime.
That identity is incorrect, the correct one is a^{n+1}-b^[n+1}=(a-b)(a^n+a^{n-1}b+...+ab^{n-1}+b^n)
So, um, you're saying that the expression 2^50 + 1 = (2^(n+1) + 1^(n+1)) and that n is supposed to be even? Isn't n here 49? There's nothing "clear" about your solution....
5 is no longer prime? Please help me understand
Log in to reply
Any number bigger than 5 and ending in a 5 is a multiple of 5 and so not prime.
I’m getting it now.
For n=1 to n=n you find that when n is an even number it is prime . So the answer is incorrect.
I've never seen a "is this number prime?" Puzzle where the answer was yes.
Log in to reply
Indeed, it is difficult to prove that a number is prime when it is as big as 2 5 0 + 1 . That is why in most of the questions you get the answer 'no'.
2^{ 1 }\quad \equiv \quad 2\quad (mod\quad 10)\\ 2^{ 2 }\quad \equiv \quad 4\quad (mod\quad 10)\\ 2^{ 3 }\quad \equiv \quad 8\quad (mod\quad 10)\\ 2^{ 4 }\quad \equiv \quad 6\quad (mod\quad 10)\\ 2^{ 5 }\quad \equiv \quad 2\quad (mod\quad 10)\\ \vdots \\ then\quad 2^{ 50 }\quad \equiv \quad 4(mod\quad 10)\quad and\quad 2^{ 50 }+1\quad \equiv \quad 5(mod\quad 10)\quad therefore\quad was\quad a\quad multiple\quad of\quad 5
2^50 + 1 = 2^50 + 1^50 = (2+1) ( 2^49 + ..... +1^49)
Log in to reply
But 2⁵⁰+1 is not divisible by 3! 2²≡1(mod3), so 2⁵⁰+1≡1²⁵+1≡2(mod3). That is 2⁵⁰+2 is divisible by 3!
I like this solution best because it gives the smallest prime factor! Alternative solution to get five as a factor: 2⁵⁰+1 = 4²⁵+1 = (4+1)(4²⁴-4²³+4²²-4²¹+...+1) using the sum of odd powers factorization.
I like this one, too.
What if it ended with 3 or 7 or 9? What would you do?
Yeah, I first went with the, "If it IS prime, it wouldn't be set at this level," then with the last digit of successive powers repeating every four times (2-4-8-6-2-4...) so that it was easy to see 2 to the 50th ended in 4.
( 2 5 0 + 2 ( 2 2 5 ) + 1 ) − 2 ( 2 2 5 ) = ( 2 2 5 + 1 ) 2 − ( 2 1 3 ) 2 = ( 2 2 5 + 2 1 3 + 1 ) ( 2 2 5 − 2 1 3 + 1 ) Hence proved that 2 5 0 + 1 is not a prime.
Similar to mod 5 solution 2^50 mod 5 = 4^25 mod 5 = (5-1)^25 mod 5 = -1 mod 5 = 4 So 2^50+1 mod 5 = 0 hence divisible by 5
Best solution.
How can you say that it's not a prime number from your final statement?
Log in to reply
should be obvious , the final product is a multiply of 2 numbers.
let ( 2 2 5 + 2 1 3 + 1 ) = A a n d ( 2 2 5 − 2 1 3 + 1 ) = B
2 5 0 + 1 = ( A ) ( B )
A prime can only be a multiple of 1 and no other integer.
P r i m e = ( P r i m e ) ( 1 ) = ( A ) ( B )
( 2 5 0 + 1 ) = ( 2 5 0 + 1 ) ( 1 ) = ( A ) ( B ) , hence it is not prime because it has more factor than itself and 1 which is A and B
It ends with a 5. The pattern for (2^n) ends in 2, 4, 8, 6... For n=1,2,3,4 and n=50 is only a multiple of n=2, therefore it ends in 4, and 4+1=5
Exactly my approach. Ends in 5 so not prime. I did it in my head, not sure why I got it wrong. 2, 4, 8, 6...plus 1 means 3, 5, 9, 7...
this is how i did it as well
If it were prime, the proof would be well beyond the scope of the question. Since the question is multiple choice, it must be composite.
Haha... That was my initial thought as well! 😎
Well 5 0 ! + 1 is prime, and that proof is pretty easy, so maybe this one could be too?
Log in to reply
I don't think so. 5 0 ! + 1 is composite. It's just not divisible by any prime under 50. In fact, Wolfram Alpha gives the prime factorisation as 1 4 9 × 3 9 8 9 × 7 4 1 9 5 1 2 7 1 0 3 × 6 8 5 4 8 7 0 0 3 7 0 1 1 × 1 0 0 6 1 2 0 4 1 0 3 6 9 3 8 5 6 8 8 0 4 6 9 0 9 9 6 7 2 2 3 5 2 0 7 7 .
Lazy programmer's solution:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
|
1 |
|
Not very elegant!
Log in to reply
..as the Roman Centurian remarked to Hannibal before being stuck in the chest with a tusk.
You could've stopped at the square root instead of half.
Log in to reply
He did. target ** .5 means target to the power of 0.5 (square root), not half.
It's a terrible solution because, short of trying to run it themselves, the reader has to trust that the output you posted really came from the program you wrote. You can't just read this and see the truth of the claim yourself: you have to already know that 2^50 + 1 = 1125899906842625.
1 + 2 5 0 = 1 + 4 ⋅ 2 4 8 = 1 4 + 4 ⋅ ( 2 1 2 ) 4 Thus by Sophie Germain we got ( 2 2 5 + 2 1 3 + 1 ) ( 2 2 5 − 2 1 3 + 1 )
No is prime number, because 2 5 0 ends in 24, the same digits of 2 1 0 . Then 2 5 0 + 1 has the last digit equal to five. Therefore 2 5 0 + 1 does not prime number.
2 5 0 + 1 = ( 2 2 + 1 ) × ( 2 4 8 − 2 4 6 + 2 4 4 − 2 4 2 + ⋯ − 2 6 + 2 4 − 2 2 + 2 0 )
through a telescoping series expansion. Hence 2 5 0 + 1 is divisible by 5.
2^50 +1= 2^50+2 2^25+1-2 2^25=(2^25+1)^2-2*2^25=(2^25+1)^2-(2^13)^2=(2^25+1+2^13)(2^25+1-2^13)
Well, I just thought that 2^50 -1 is a Mersenes prime so 2^50 +1 would have to be a twin prime to be a prime and there is darn few of those so by probability, I decided it would not be a prime. Not very scientific but that was the best I could do. I could have gone to a calculator and discovered that it ended in 4 then plus 1 is five and it then could not be a prime
2 2 ≡ 4 ≡ − 1 ( m o d 5 ) . Since 25 is odd, ( − 1 ) 2 5 ≡ − 1 ( m o d 5 ) , so 2 5 0 ≡ ( 2 2 ) 2 5 ≡ − 1 ( m o d 5 ) . Hence, 2 5 0 + 1 ≡ 0 ( m o d 5 ) , so 2 5 0 + 1 is divisible by 5. It follows that 2 5 0 + 1 is not prime.
Powers of any number follow a cycle in their last digit. For powers of 2, it's 2, 4, 8, 6 and then repeating. The cycle length is 4. So just as 2^4 end in 6, 2^48 will also end in 6. 2^50, having two more factors of 2, ends in 4. Therefor 2^50+1 ends in 5, which means it must be divisible by 5.
By Jim Schuller: 2*2 + 1 = 5. And 5 multiplied by any number of 2's is going to be divisible by 5. Hence 2^2+1 cannot be prime.
We know that the last digit of 2 4 n + 1 is 2,the last digit of 2 4 n + 2 is 4,the last digit of 2 4 n + 3 is 8 and the last digit of 2 4 n is 6. Since 5 0 = 2 + 1 2 ∗ 4 so the last digit of 2 5 0 is 4 so the last digit of 2 5 0 + 1 is 5 and therefore it divisible by 5 and that means it not prime as well as the answer is No
( 1 + p 1 0 ) ( 1 − p 1 0 + p 2 0 − p 3 0 + p 4 0 ) = 1 + p 5 0 is a non-trivial factorization of p 5 0 + 1 , so it is not a prime number.
2 5 0 + 1 = 4 2 5 + 1 ≡ ( − 1 ) 2 5 + 1 ≡ − 1 + 1 = 0 ( m o d 5 )
It's divisible by 5 so it's not a prime
2^50+1 = (2^10)^5 +1 = ((1024)^4) *1024 +1 = (a number ending in 6) * 1024 + 1 = a number ending in 4 + 1 = number ending 5 = divisible be 5 = composite
Complete the square: 2^50 + 1 = (2^25)^2 - 2 2^25 + 1 - 2 2^25 = (2^25 + 1)^2 - 2*2^25 = (2^25 +1)^2 - 2^26 = (2^25 + 1)^2 - (2^13)^2 Difference of two squares = [(2^25 + 1) + (2^13)] * [(2^25 + 1) - (2^13)] composite
By binomial theorem we can write 2^50 i.e. 4^25 as (5-1)^25 . Last term in this expansion would be -1 which would cancel out the +1 while all other terms will contain atleast one '5' making 2^50 +1 a multiple of 5. Hence it isnt a prime number.
2^10=1,024, hence 2^20 ends by 6 4*4), 2^40 ends by 6, too. Finally, 2^50 ends by 4, and 2^50+1 ends by 5, thus divides by 5
2 5 0 + 1 = ( 5 − 1 ) 2 5 + 1 ≡ 0 m o d 5
no here are the factors 1 | 5 | 25 | 41 | 101 | 125 | 205 | 505 | 1025 | 2525 | 4141 | 5125 | 8101 | 12625 | 20705 | 40505 | 103525 | 202525 | 268501 | 332141 | 517625 | 818201 | 1012625 | 1342505 | 1660705 | 4091005 | 6712525 | 8303525 | 11008541 | 20455025 | 27118601 | 33546241 | 33562625 | 41517625 | 55042705 | 102275125 | 135593005 | 167731205 | 275213525 | 677965025 | 838656025 | 1111862641 | 1376067625 | 2175126601 | 3389825125 | 4193280125 | 5559313205 | 10875633005 | 27796566025 | 54378165025 | 89180190641 | 138982830125 | 219687786701 | 271890825125 | 445900953205 | 1098438933505 | 2229504766025 | 5492194667525 | 9007199254741 | 11147523830125 | 27460973337625 | 45035996273705 | 225179981368525 | 1125899906842625 (64 divisors)
It is divisible by 5. Hence not a prime ( 2 5 0 + 1 ≡ 0 ( m o d 5 ) )
2^50 ends with 4 so 2^50+1 ends with 5
2^50 = 4^25. We know that powers of 4 modulo 10 alternate between 4 and 6, so odd powers yield 4 and even powers yield 6. 25 is odd, so 4^25 mod 10 is 5. So, adding 1 gives you 6 mod 10, which is divisible by 2, hence, 2^50 + 1 is not prime.
2^(4x)= AA...AA6
2^((4x)+1)= BB...BB2 (..AA6 *2)
2^((4x)+2)= CC...CC4
(2^((4x)+2))+1=CC...CC5
Where x is a positive integer (12 in this case)
--> CC...CC5 is divisible by 5; end digit is key
The ones digit of the powers of 2 follow the pattern 2,4,8,6. Therefore, 2 to the 48th would go through this cycle 8 times, and 2 to the 50th would have a ones digit of 4. Adding one would make the ones digit 5, and so the number wouldn't be prime because it is divisible by 5 and it is not 5.
The answer can be found using the Wilson's Theorem which states that an integer p > 1 is a prime iff
( p − 1 ) ! ≡ − 1 ( m o d p )
If we now substitute p = 2 5 0 + 1 and add one to both sides, we get:
2 5 0 ! + 1 ≡ 0 ( m o d 2 5 0 + 1 )
Because ( 2 5 0 + 1 ) ∤ ( 2 5 0 ! + 1 ) , the assumption is wrong and p is not a prime.
2^50 = 4^25. 4 is congruent to 4 mod 5. Any even power of 4 is congruent to 1 mod 5, and any odd power is congruent to 4 mod 5. 4^25 + 1 must be divisible by 5.
The number 2 5 0 + 1 is divisible by 5 (and clearly greater than 5 ) and therefore cannot be a prime number, since
2 4 ≡ 1 m o d 5
and thus
2 5 0 = ( 2 4 ) 1 2 × 4 ≡ 4 m o d 5
whence
2 5 0 + 1 ≡ 4 + 1 ≡ 0 m o d 5 .
2^(2n+1) is prime for all n is an element of Z^+, and 2^2n is not prime for all n is an element of Z^+
Lo he dividido por todos los anteriores con mi calculadora y había uno que sí.
(2^50)+1=((2^10)^5)+1
Since (2^10)=1024 and,
The result of ((Unit place of 1024 i.e. 4)^5) ends with 4,
Then 4+1=5.
Any natural number ending with 5 necessarily CANNOT BE PRIME.
Hence proved.
This is perhaps the easiest logical solution to the given example!!! Hope it's clearly understood by all.
It's in 2^m +1 form, as per Fermate prime number rule it can be a prime if and only if m is 2^n. In our case 50 cannot be written as 2^n so 2^50 +1 is not a prime.
I'd like someone with a math background to respond to this, since this is the way I did it; and I'd love to know if it's correct.
i just guessed it...and i was right ....after all there are only two choices..what to worry about ..huh
2
2
≡
−
1
(
m
o
d
5
)
therefore
2
5
0
≡
−
1
(
m
o
d
5
)
also
1
≡
1
(
m
o
d
5
)
adding both
2
5
0
+
1
≡
0
(
m
o
d
5
)
so not a prime
I've checked the statics of 2^n+1 And it's N y y n y n n n y n n n y...
*n: no. *y: yes
Sol I: Obviously, there are more n then y So, it is not prime
Sol II: Since the pattern begin at the fifth tribe, so (50-4) mod 4 : 2
y n n n y n n n ...
So, it is NOT a prime
Both solutions are showing that it's not a prime number
Nope. Since 2 n ≡ 2 m o d 5 when n ≡ 1 m o d 4 , then 2 4 9 ≡ 2 , and 2 5 0 ≡ 4 m o d 5 , thus 2 5 0 + 1 ≡ 0 m o d 5 so 5 divides 2 5 0 + 1 and so that's not a prime.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
We know,
a n + 1 + b n + 1 = ( a + b ) ( a n − a n − 1 b + . . . + b n )
Where n is an even number.
And,
2 5 0 + 1 = ( 2 1 0 ) 5 + 1 5
Clearly it is not a prime.