How many triples ( x , y , z ) of positive integers satisfy the equation
x y z y z x z x y = 3 x y z
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
( 1 , 2 , 3 ) , ( 2 , 3 , 1 ) , ( 3 , 1 , 2 ) are not solutions. Also, you can't assume wlog x ≤ y ≤ z , since the equation is cyclic, not symmetric. The "correct" answer is wrong. The actual answer is 3 . All the solutions are ( 1 , 3 , 2 ) , ( 2 , 1 , 3 ) , ( 3 , 2 , 1 ) .
Correct solution: The equation is cyclic. Two cases: if wlog x = 1 , then ( x , y , z ) = ( 1 , 3 , 2 ) . Otherwise, x , y , z ≥ 2 and 3 x y z ≥ x 4 y 4 z 4 ⟺ 3 ≥ x 3 y 3 z 3 , impossible. Answer: ( x , y , z ) = ( 1 , 3 , 2 ) , ( 2 , 1 , 3 ) , ( 3 , 2 , 1 ) are all the solutions.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Assume WLOG that x ≤ y ≤ z . Case 1 (x=1): y z = 3 y ⇒ y = 3 z = 2 This triple can be arranged in 3! = 6 ways leaving 6 triples. Case 2 (x=2): 2 y z . y z 2 . z 2 y = 6 y z Now y = 2 suggests that z is a multiply of 3 which produces no solutions (as LHS > RHS) and y = 3 produces 8 z . 3 z 2 . z 7 = 1 8 so there are no solution here for the same reason. Now as y gets larger the LHS gets larger faster than the RHS.
Case 3 ( x ≥ 3 ): x y z − 1 . y z x − 1 . z x y − 1 = 3 ⇒ y z − 1 ≤ 1 ⇒ y z ≤ 2 This contradicts the assumption that x ≤ y ≤ z . Hence, there are only 3 triples given by (1,3,2) ,(2,1,3) and (3,1,2) (3 of the 6 arrangements are not valid).