⎣ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ∫ 0 ∞ e − x 2 cos 2 x d x ∫ 0 ∞ e − x 2 d x ⎦ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ = ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I missed a minus sign in the third to last line, it should be : 4 − a 2 + C .
Log in to reply
also in the last line a small mistake: it is f(2) not f(1).
Hey Haroun, could you please explain how you got f 'a??
Thanks a lot for the solution! Learnt a lot from it!
pliz tell me hw f(o)=1
is this known as differentiating under the integral sign
We can also use the mclaurin series for cos2x and then gamma function for denominator.
this is the awesome solution and the sum is awesome
What functions you have taken for by parts
F(2) not f(1)
There are different ways of solving such mundane problem. Without thinking too much one can directly apply gamma function in its standard format. As for numerator the result is a 1/2(sqrt(pi)) and on the other hand , the denominator can also be converted into the closed form of a gamma function by applying a suitable " perfect square" trick. Then one can simply approximate cosine function as the real part of a plane wave exp(2ix). Finally, the denominator apart from 1/2(sqrt(pi)) will also contain "1/(e=2.71828)". And in the end, we end up with 2.71828. Since we have to calculate floor value so one just takes out 2.
This problem can also be evaluated by Laplace integral formalism and contour integral too.
I do not know, how to write here in proper math's symbols.
did the same!! thanks to gamma function!!
The integrand in the numerator describes half of a Gaussian with standard deviation σ = 2 .
The integrand in the denominator describes that same Gaussian multiplied by cos 2 x , which remains close to 1 for small values of x , and reaches zero for x = π / 2 ≈ 1 . 1 σ .
It is well-known that about 6 4 % of the mass of a Gaussian lies within σ from its center; in this case, between x = 0 and x ≈ 1 . 5 . The multiplication by cos 2 x decreases this percentage somewhat, and there is a negative contribution to the integral between π / 2 < x < π , but that is relatively small.
Therefore it is a reasonable guess that 0 . 3 3 < numerator denominator < 0 . 5 0 , which is sufficient to conclude that the answer should be 2 .
I did this by same...🐹🐹🐹
Sab hawa ho gaya😕🙄🤥😾
I did this by same…🐹🐹🐹
The upper integral is a gaussian integral which can be evaluated using the gamma function evaluated at 3/2; then using the recursive formula for gamma function. It can also be derived using cartesian or polar corrdinates.
The lower integral can be evaluated using the integral of f ( z ) = e − z 2 along the contour which is a rectangle with corners a+0i, a+bi, -a+bi, -a+0i. Since f(z) is entire, by Cauchy-Goursat Theorem the integral of f(z) around the contour is zero. Get the sum of the horizontal and vertical legs of the contour.
Thanks for the solution Haroun
its really facinating.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Consider this function : f ( a ) = 0 ∫ ∞ e − x 2 cos a x d x . It is well defined for any a ∈ R , differentiate it with respect to a and integrate by parts to get that : f ′ ( a ) = 0 ∫ ∞ − x e − x 2 sin a x d x = [ 2 e − x 2 sin a x ] 0 ∞ − 2 a 0 ∫ ∞ e − x 2 cos a x d x = 2 − a f ( a ) . So : f ′ ( a ) = 2 − a f ( a ) , by separation of variables we get that : ln ( f ( a ) ) = ∫ f ( a ) d f = − ∫ 2 a d a = 4 a 2 + C ⟹ f ( a ) = f ( 0 ) e − 4 a 2 ∀ a ∈ R . Therefore : ⌊ ∫ 0 ∞ e − x 2 cos 2 x d x ∫ 0 ∞ e − x 2 d x ⌋ = ⌊ f ( 1 ) f ( 0 ) ⌋ = ⌊ e ⌋ = 2 .