Problematic Proof?

Algebra Level 5
  1. Any complex number z z , with z = 1 |z|=1 can be expressed in the form e i θ + 2 k i π e^{i\theta +2ki\pi} .

  2. ( a b ) c = a b c (a^{b})^{c} = a^{bc} meaning that z i = e i ( i θ + 2 k i π ) = e θ 2 k π z^{i}=e^{i*(i\theta +2ki\pi)} = e^{-\theta -2k\pi}

Result: z i z^{i} holds an infinite number of values all with argument 0 but with a range of magnitudes.

Is there a problem with this and if so with which step does it lie?

The proof is correct Result is inferred incorrectly Step 1 Step 2

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

The proof is correct: in the same way that 4 0.5 4^{0.5} is both 2 and -2 any complex number magnitude 1 raised to a complex power can be an infinite number of different things

4^0.5 is only 2. -4^0.5 is -2.

J D - 4 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

Just to clarify, with -4^0.5 I meant -(4^0.5)

J D - 4 years, 3 months ago

No, 4^0.5 is both things (and can be proven to be both as above) the square root of 4 is, as you say, only 2 as the square root function always returns the principle root (i.e k=0)

William Whitehouse - 4 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

As a real exponential 4 0.5 = 2 4^{0.5} = 2 , not 2 -2 . This is dictated by enforcing continuity on exponential functions.

As a complex exponential, you are correct that 4 0.5 4^{0.5} must be allowed to be both 2 , 2 2, -2 until we choose a branch.

These two exponentials are very different creatures and we should make sure to not confuse them...

Brian Moehring - 4 years, 3 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...