Problems need HardWork 20

Algebra Level 4

Find the sum of all real solution to the equation :

2 x + 3 x + 6 x = x 2 2^x + 3^x + 6^x = x^2


The answer is -1.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

Gian Sanjaya
Aug 29, 2015

First we can see that for all x R + x \in R^{+} :

6 x > 3 x > x 2 > 0 6^{x}>3^{x}>x^{2}>0 and 2 x > 0 2^x>0

The unobviously correct part is 3 x > x 2 3^{x}>x^2 . Note that we still have x R + x \in R^{+} . For proving this first we need to take the first and second derivative of 3 x x 2 3^x-x^2 :

d d x ( 3 x x 2 ) = 3 x ln 3 2 x \frac{d}{dx}(3^x-x^2)=3^x \ln 3 - 2x

d d x ( 3 x ln 3 2 x ) = 3 x ln 2 3 2 \frac{d}{dx}(3^x \ln 3 - 2x) = 3^x \ln^2 3 - 2

Set y as the value of x that make the value of the second derivative equals 0:

y = log 3 2 ln 2 3 y = \log_3 \frac{2}{\ln^2 3}

Notice that whenever x > y x>y , the second derivative becomes positive, and whenever x < y x<y , the second derivative becomes negative. This means the first derivative is minimum at x = y x=y , and that minimum equals:

2 ln 3 2 log 3 2 ln 2 3 = 2 ln 3 ( 1 ln 2 ln 2 3 ) > 1 ln 2 > 0 \frac{2}{\ln 3}-2 \log_3 \frac{2}{\ln^2 3} = \frac{2}{\ln 3}(1-\ln \frac{2}{\ln^2 3}) > 1-\ln 2 > 0

because 0 < ln 2 < 1 < ln 3 < 2 0<\ln 2<1<\ln 3<2 . Thus, the first derivative is always positive.

Since 3 0 > 0 1 3^0>0^1 and the first derivative is always positive, then it's proven that 3 x > x 2 3^x>x^2 for all x R + x \in R^{+} .

Hence, all solutions of x lies in R R^{-} as x=0 is not a solution, obviously. Now, f ( x ) = 2 x + 3 x + 6 x f(x)=2^x+3^x+6^x is a monotone increasing function at all values of x R x \in R while g ( x ) = x 2 g(x)=x^2 is a monotone decreasing function at all values of x R x \in R^{-} . As a result, there is a maximum of one value of x in R R^{-} that satisfy the equation. As there is no solution of x in [ 0 , ) [0,\infty) and x = 1 x=-1 does satisfy the equation, then the only solution is x = 1 \boxed{x=-1} . Any feedback please?

can it be proved without calculus that the graph has only one intersection?

Dev Sharma - 5 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Well sorry I can't describe how to prove in the graph that it has only one intersection, although I can imagine my self that it does. Still, my solution include my imagination on the graph. Could you give a better solution?

Gian Sanjaya - 5 years, 9 months ago
Abhi Kumbale
Sep 2, 2016

First prove that

f (x)= 2^(x) + 3^(x) + 6^(x) - x^(2)

is a strictly increasing function. This can be done by using the first derivative and the second derivatives. Then is proves that -1 is the only root.

Yash Sapre
Sep 24, 2015

2 x + 1 + 3 x + 1 + 6 x + 1 2^{x+1}+3^{x+1}+6^{x+1} increases the value of 2 x + 3 x + 6 x 2^{x}+3^{x}+6^{x} by 2 x + 3 x + 3 x 2^{x}+3^{x}+3^{x} +... which is greater than 2x+1 So LHS would be always greater than RHS where x>0 So the cases left are 0 and negative nos. x can't be 0 after verification. Now the negative values : -1 satisfies the condition.Then the denominators later on(onwards 2) can't be completely divisible by the numerator.So only -1 can be the answer.

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...