Product Free Subet

Consider all subsets S { 1 , 2 , 3 , , 100 } S \subset \{ 1, 2, 3, \ldots, 100 \} such that for any 2 distinct elements a a and b b in S S , their product a × b a \times b is not in S S .

What is the maximum possible number of elements in an S S ?


The answer is 91.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

Calvin Lin Staff
Nov 16, 2016

Clearly, A = { 10 , 11 , 12 , 100 } A = \{ 10, 11, 12, \ldots 100 \} satisfies the conditions of the question. We have A = 91 |A| = 91 .

Suppose that B B is another subset that satisfies the conditions.
If 1 B 1 \in B then we must have B = { 1 } B = \{ 1 \} and so B = 1 |B| = 1 . Henceforce, we assume 1 ∉ B 1 \not \in B .
Let C = B { 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 } C = B \cap \{ 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 \} . The goal is to map every element in C C to a distinct element in A B A - B .

If 9 C 9 \in C , then at least one of 11 or 99 is not in A B A - B . We map 9 to this element.
If 8 C 8 \in C , then at least one of 12 or 96 is not in A B A - B . We map 8 to this element.
If 7 C 7 \in C , then at least one of 13 or 91 is not in A B A - B . We map 7 to this element.
If 6 C 6 \in C , then at least one of 14 or 84 is not in A B A - B . We map 6 to this element.
If 5 C 5 \in C , then at least one of 15 or 75 is not in A B A - B . We map 5 to this element.
If 4 C 4 \in C , then at least one of 16 or 64 is not in A B A - B . We map 4 to this element.
If 3 C 3 \in C , then at least one of 17 or 51 is not in A B A - B . We map 3 to this element.
If 2 C 2 \in C , then at least one of 18 or 36 is not in A B A - B . We map 2 to this element.
Clearly, this map gives us a distinct element in A B A - B .

Hence, we can show that

B = ( B A ) ˙ ( B A ) = C + ( B A ) A B + B A = A = 91. |B| = | ( B \cap \overline{A} ) \dot{\cup} ( B \cap A) | = | C | + | ( B \cap A ) | \leq |A - B | + |B \cap A | = |A| = 91.

Note: The symbol ˙ \dot { \cup } indicates a disjoint union, which is why we can break up the count.

@Wen Z This is how we ensure that any other subset will have size at most 91.

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years, 7 months ago

Instead of saying "If a S a \in S , then at least one of b b and c c is not in S S ", just say "at least one of a , b , c a,b,c is not in S S ". So the proof goes:

At least one member in each of the following triples is not in S S :

  • 2, 18, 36
  • 3, 17, 51
  • ...
  • 9, 11, 99

That's 8 elements not in S S . Together with the 1, that's 9 elements, so S 100 9 = 91 |S| \le 100-9 = 91 .

Ivan Koswara - 4 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

Ah, very nice presentation, which makes it much more "pigeon-hole". Could you add that as a seperate solution? Thanks!

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years, 6 months ago
Ivan Koswara
Nov 25, 2016

First, note that S = { 10 , 11 , 12 , , 100 } S = \{10, 11, 12, \ldots, 100\} is a solution, since the product of two distinct integers in S S must be at least 10 × 11 = 110 > 100 10 \times 11 = 110 > 100 . We have S = 91 |S| = 91 . Is this the maximum?

For each i { 1 , 2 , 3 , , 9 } i \in \{1, 2, 3, \ldots, 9\} , at least one of the numbers i , 20 i , i ( 20 i ) i, 20-i, i(20-i) are not in S S , because the third number is the product of the first two; if all of them are in S S , then because i , 20 i S i, 20-i \in S , we should have i × ( 20 i ) ∉ S i \times (20-i) \not\in S , but i × ( 20 i ) = i ( 20 i ) S i \times (20-i) = i(20-i) \in S , contradiction. Additionally, it can be verified that the sets { i , 20 i , i ( 20 i ) } \{i, 20-i, i(20-i)\} for all i { 1 , 2 , , 9 } i \in \{1, 2, \ldots, 9\} are pairwise disjoint. Thus at least one number from each set is not in S S , for a total of at least 9 such numbers. Thus S 100 9 = 91 |S| \le 100-9 = 91 , proving that S = 91 |S| = 91 is indeed the maximum.

Conor Donovan
Nov 3, 2016

You can include the numbers 10-100 because the lowest possible product is 10x11 = 110 which is not in S since it is outside the range of numbers 10-100.

Once you include smaller numbers than 10, you are creating possible pairs ab such that 10<=ab<=100. If you include 1, you can make 10 from 1x10. If you include 9, you can make 9x10 = 90 which is in S. Consequently all the numbers 2-9 when multiplied by 10 are in the range 10-90 and therefore these products are in S. So no number 1-9 can be included. Just 10-100. So the answer is 91

technically this is incorrect as you have shown that you can't add any more elements, not that this subset has maximal size

Wen Z - 4 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Yes, the tricky part is to justify that there is no other subset with a larger size that satisfies the conditions. Thoughts?

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years, 7 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...