Proof Revision!

Geometry Level 3

Take a look at the following proof.

We're going to try to prove that if O O is a point inside A B D \triangle ABD , then A D + A B > O D + O B AD+AB>OD+OB .

First join O O and A A .

From the triangle inequality,

A D + O A > O D ( 1 ) AD+OA> OD\cdots (1)

O B + O A > A B ( 2 ) OB+OA>AB\cdots (2)

Subtract ( 2 ) (2) from ( 1 ) (1) to get,

A D O B > O D A B AD-OB>OD-AB

Switch sides to get,

A D + A B > O D + O B AD+AB>OD+OB

Q E D \mathbb{QED}

Here are some comments about the proof.

[ 1 ] [1] . The proof is not correct. There's an invalid move hiding in there somewhere.

[ 2 ] [2] . Relax! Not everything in this set is a trick question. This proof is perfectly fine.

[ 3 ] [3] . Forget the proof! The claim itself is not true!

Which comment here is correct?


This problem is from the set "MCQ Is Not As Easy As 1-2-3". You can see the rest of the problems here .

[ 2 ] [2] None of them are correct. You missed the letter C C in the diagram.That's why this proof is wrong! [ 3 ] [3] [ 1 ] [1]

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Mursalin Habib
May 12, 2014

The proof is actually invalid. You can't just subtract inequalities like that. Watch what happens when you subtract ( 1 ) (1) from ( 2 ) (2) .

You get,

O B A D > A B O D OB-AD>AB-OD

Rearrange the terms to get,

O D + O B > A D + A B OD+OB>AD+AB .

This is exactly the opposite of what you have to prove. Inequalities can not be subtracted that way. We just happened to get a correct conclusion from an incorrect method.

If a > b a>b and c > d c>d , the correct way to 'subtract' them is multiplying the latter by 1 -1 and then adding them together.

So, the c > d c>d becomes d > c -d>-c and a d > b c a-d>b-c . This last statement is always correct.


As an example, take these two inequalities

6 > 5 ( 1 ) 6>5\cdots (1)

5 > 3 ( 2 ) 5>3\cdots (2)

Subtract ( 2 ) (2) from ( 1 ) (1) and you're going to get

1 > 2 1>2

which is obviously not true.

Here is a correct proof that A D + A B > O D + O B AD + AB > OD + OB :

Let C C be the intersection of A B AB and O D OD . By the triangle inequality on triangle B C O BCO , B C + C O > B O . BC + CO > BO. By the triangle inequality on triangle A C D ACD , A C + A D > C D . AC + AD > CD. We can certainly add these inequalities, to get A C + B C + A D + C O > B O + C D = B O + C O + O D . AC + BC + AD + CO > BO + CD = BO + CO + OD. We can write A C + B C = A B AC + BC = AB , and cancel C O CO from both sides, to get A B + A D > B O + O D . AB + AD > BO + OD.

Jon Haussmann - 7 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

This eliminates statement [ 3 ] [3] as we can see that the claim is of course true.

Mursalin Habib - 7 years, 1 month ago

Yes, the fist statement in the proof the subtraction of inequality is wrong ,First upvoter

Mardokay Mosazghi - 7 years, 1 month ago

This question reminds me of two questions I came up with during a test :)

Tan Li Xuan - 7 years, 1 month ago

Statement is correct and though I knew you subtracted inequalities, I perchance clicked the on wrong one....my luck ;)

kalyan pakala - 7 years ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...