Pythagorean Chaos I

Consider the following statements about pythagorean triples :

  • If n 3 ( m o d 4 ) n\equiv3 \pmod4 , it can never be the hypotenuse in a pythagorean triangle.

  • If z z is a complex number with distinct positive integer real and imaginary parts, then there is a pythagorean triangle with side lengths I m ( z 2 ) |Im(z^2)| , R e ( z 2 ) |Re(z^2)| , and z 2 |z^2| .

  • If ( a , b , c ) (a,b,c) is a pythagorean triple, it can be rewritten as ( R e ( z 2 ) , I m ( z 2 ) , z 2 ) (Re(z^2),Im(z^2),|z^2|) , for some complex number z z with integer real and imaginary parts.

  • If for a z z with distinct positive integer real and imaginary parts ( R e ( z 2 ) , I m ( z 2 ) , z 2 ) (|Re(z^2)|,|Im(z^2)|,|z^2|) isn't a primitive pythagorean triple, ( R e ( z 2 ) 2 , I m ( z 2 ) 2 , z 2 2 ) (\frac{|Re(z^2)|}{2},\frac{|Im(z^2)|}{2},\frac{|z^2|}{2}) is.

  • If ( a , b , c ) (a,b,c) is a primitive pythtagorian triple, then there is exactly 1 1 even number, and it is either a a or b b .

How many of them are correct?

Pythagorean Chaos II

5 3 1 2 4

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Pedro Cardoso
May 23, 2018

If n 3 ( m o d 4 ) n\equiv3 \pmod4 , it can never be the hypotenuse in a pythagorean triangle.

This statement is false (not this one, that one, let's avoid paradoxes :) ). An easy counter example is 1 5 2 = 9 2 + 1 2 2 15^2=9^2+12^2 . It is true, however, that you can't write a number that's one less than a multiple of 4 4 as a sum of two squares.

If z z is a complex number with distinct positive integer real and imaginary parts, then there is a pythagorean triangle with side lengths I m ( z 2 ) |Im(z^2)| , R e ( z 2 ) |Re(z^2)| , and z 2 |z^2| .

Correct: When we square a complex number, we square it's magnitude, and since the magnitude of a complex number is just ( R e ( z ) ) 2 + ( I m ( z ) ) 2 \sqrt{(Re(z))^2+(Im(z))^2} , when we square it, it becomes an integer. it is also equal to ( R e ( z 2 ) ) 2 + ( I m ( z 2 ) ) 2 \sqrt{(Re(z^2))^2+(Im(z^2))^2} , of course. So we have z 2 = ( R e ( z 2 ) ) 2 + ( I m ( z 2 ) ) 2 |z^2|=\sqrt{(Re(z^2))^2+(Im(z^2))^2} Which gives z 2 2 = ( R e ( z 2 ) ) 2 + ( I m ( z 2 ) ) 2 |z^2|^2=(Re(z^2))^2+(Im(z^2))^2

If ( a , b , c ) (a,b,c) is a pythagorean triple, it can be rewritten as ( R e ( z 2 ) , I m ( z 2 ) , z 2 ) (Re(z^2),Im(z^2),|z^2|) , for some complex number z z with integer real and imaginary parts.

Incorrect: as a counter-example, you can't write 6 + 8 i 6+8i that way, in other words, 6 + 8 i \sqrt{6+8i} isn't a gaussian integer

If for a z z with distinct positive integer real and imaginary parts ( R e ( z 2 ) , I m ( z 2 ) , z 2 ) (|Re(z^2)|,|Im(z^2)|,|z^2|) isn't a primitive pythagorean triple, ( R e ( z 2 ) 2 , I m ( z 2 ) 2 , z 2 2 ) (\frac{|Re(z^2)|}{2},\frac{|Im(z^2)|}{2},\frac{|z^2|}{2}) is.

Incorrect: take z = 4 + 2 i z=4+2i , when we square it, we get 12 + 16 i 12+16i , which is not primitive, but 6 + 8 i 6+8i isn't either.

If ( a , b , c ) (a,b,c) is a primitive pythtagorian triple, then there is exactly 1 1 even number, and it is either a a or b b .

Correct: If it were possible to make a primitive pythagorean triple by having a triangle with two odd legs, we'd have: ( 2 a ) 2 = ( 2 b + 1 ) 2 + ( 2 c + 1 ) 2 ) (2a)^2=(2b+1)^2+(2c+1)^2) . Expanding gives: 4 a 2 = 4 b 2 + 4 b + 4 c 2 + 4 c + 2 4a^2=4b^2+4b+4c^2+4c+2 . Looking at it m o d 4 \mod4 gives 4 2 4\equiv2 , which is a contradiction.

You need to update the third statement as at the moment it does not require the complex number to be Gaussian. Too late for me, unfortunately!

zico quintina - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

Fixed it, sorry about that

Pedro Cardoso - 3 years ago

The second statement seems false to me using the counter example: z=1+1i, then z^2=2i so Re(z^2)=0. I would disqualify a triangle with zero side length.

Sam Salmons - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

Thanks for pointing it out, added a restriction

Pedro Cardoso - 3 years ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...