Are there any Pythagorean triples (of integers) that form a geometric progression ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Let our three integers in a Pythagorean triple be called a , b , and c with a < b < c . If there is an integer solution to this problem, we can rewrite these using the formula for a term in a geometric progression with a as the starting term and r as the common ratio. This gives b = a r and c = a r 2 . Plugging these into the Pythagorean theorem, we get a 2 + ( a r ) 2 = ( a r 2 ) 2 . Simplifying and gathering like terms gives a 2 r 4 − a 2 r 2 − a 2 = 0 . As a must be a positive integer, we can simplify by dividing by a 2 , giving r 4 − r 2 − 1 = 0 . Now set x = r 2 giving x 2 − x − 1 = 0 . Using the quadratic formula, we get x = 2 1 + 5 meaning r = 2 1 + 5 . As r is irrational, no integer value of a can result in a geometric progression of integers that is also a Pythagorean triple. Therefore, the answer is no.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Let our three integers in a Pythagorean triple be x, y, and z.Assume that there is a Pythagorean triple like this in a geometric series: x y = y z . Cross-multiplying, y 2 = x z . Plugging this into the Pythagorean theorem, x 2 + x z = z 2 . Also, x 2 + x z − z 2 = 0 . Solve this as a quadratic in terms of x to find the discriminant is 5, which is not a perfect square, meaning that any solutions to this quadratic will be irrational. But, for this to be a Pythagorean triple, x, y, and z must be integers. So, the answer is No.