Suppose p ( x ) = a x 2 + b x + c is a quadratic polynomial with real coefficients and ∣ p ( x ) ∣ ≤ 1 for all values of x in the range [ 0 , 1 ] . Find the largest possible value of ∣ a ∣ + ∣ b ∣ + ∣ c ∣ .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I thought that this was a pretty standard problem, but was dismayed by students inability to approach it.
This nice solution really explains what is going on. Many other solutions are possible as well, especially if one is will to consider different cases based on the signs of the coefficients or the position of the vertex of the parabola.
One has to carefully distinguish between guessing the answer and justifying it. While it seems likely, almost obvious, that a parabola passing through the points ( 0 , 1 ) , 2 1 , − 1 and ( 1 , 1 ) gives the best sum of absolute values of the coefficients, this definitely has to be justified rigorously.
Log in to reply
Yeah I'm not sure why this rated so high. What are the stats? Like how many views vs. solvers vs. attempts?
Log in to reply
it s hard for a person that never see like it
It is easy to verify that the following symmetries hold:
If p ( x ) = a x 2 + b x + c satisfies the given conditions and maximizes ∣ a ∣ + ∣ b ∣ + ∣ c ∣ , then so is − p ( x ) = − a x 2 − b x − c .
If p ( x ) = a x 2 + b x + c satisfies the given conditions and maximizes ∣ a ∣ + ∣ b ∣ + ∣ c ∣ , then so is p ( 1 − x ) = a ( 1 − x ) 2 + b ( 1 − x ) + c = a x 2 − ( 2 a + b ) x + a + b + c .
Because of 1. we can assume that a ≥ 0 . That means p ( x ) is a parabola opening upwards.
Because of 2. we can choose whether to have the vertex of the parabola to the left or to the right of x = 0 . 5 (or exactly at that point of course). We will choose the vertex ( x 0 , y 0 ) to be to the right of x = 0 . 5 , i.e. x 0 = − 2 a b ≥ 0 . 5 , which also means that b < 0 .
With these assumptions: p ( x ) ≤ p ( 0 ) = c for all 0 ≤ x ≤ 1 ( ≤ 2 x 0 ) . That means, if we have a solution satisfying the conditions of the problem, we can always shift the parabola upwards until we reach p ( 0 ) = c = 1 without violating the conditions and increasing ∣ a ∣ + ∣ b ∣ + ∣ c ∣ . That means, when we have values a , b and c that maximize ∣ a ∣ + ∣ b ∣ + ∣ c ∣ , c must be equal to 1.
We have now 2 cases:
a. The vertex of the parabola is x 0 = − 2 a b ≥ 1 , or − b ≥ 2 a . In this case the parabola is monotonically decreasing for x between 0 and 1. As long as p ( 1 ) = a + b + c > − 1 we can always decrease b (which is negative, so that ∣ a ∣ + ∣ b ∣ + ∣ c ∣ increases) until we reach p ( 1 ) = − 1 (the condition − b > 2 a will remain true, since − b is increasing). That means, that for the optimal solution in this case we have: p ( 0 ) = c = 1 , p ( 1 ) = a + b + 1 = − 1 or − b = a + 2 ≥ 2 a which gives a ≤ 2 , and finally ∣ a ∣ + ∣ b ∣ + ∣ c ∣ = a + a + 2 + 1 = 2 a + 3 ≤ 7 .
b. The vertex of the parabola is 0 . 5 ≤ x 0 = − 2 a b < 1 . In this case, the minimum of the parabola is at x 0 = − 2 a b , y 0 = c − 4 a b 2 , which is within the limits of the conditions of the problem statement ( 0 ≤ x 0 ≤ 1 , so that we must also have − 1 ≤ y 0 ≤ 1 . Again, we can decrease b (increase its absolute value, which also decreases y 0 ), until we reach y 0 = − 1 or we reach − 2 a b = 1 . The second limit is part of case a., so we will check here reaching the first limit: y 0 = c − 4 a b 2 = − 1 or, with c = 1 : b 2 = 8 a . The condition 0 . 5 ≤ x 0 < 1 changes now to: 0 . 5 ≤ − b 4 < 1 , and because b is negative: − 8 ≤ b < − 4 . Finally, we get: ∣ a ∣ + ∣ b ∣ + ∣ c ∣ = 8 b 2 − b + 1 which is maximized for b = − 8 giving the value ∣ a ∣ + ∣ b ∣ + ∣ c ∣ = 1 7 .
From the cases a. and b. we see that the best solution is 17, and can be reached for b = − 8 , a = 8 b 2 = 8 , c=1, with: p ( x ) = 8 x 2 − 8 x + 1 . We can verify: the vertex of this parabola is at x 0 = 0 . 5 , y 0 = − 1 , and p ( 0 ) = 1 , p ( 1 ) = 1 .
Of course, because of the symmetries mentioned in the beginning, also p ( x ) = − 8 x 2 + 8 x − 1 satisfy the conditions and reach the maximum ∣ a ∣ + ∣ b ∣ + ∣ c ∣ = 1 7 .
The function p ( x ) = 8 x 2 − 8 x + 1 has its minimum at x = 2 1 , with p ( 2 1 ) = − 1 ,and so its maximum on the interval will be at 0 or 1 . p ( 0 ) = p ( 1 ) = 1 , so this function, with a sum of 17, satisfies the conditions.
Otherwise:
Note that k = a + b + c = p ( 1 ) , l = 4 a + 2 b + c = p ( 2 1 ) and m = c = p ( 0 ) satisfy ∣ k ∣ , ∣ l ∣ , ∣ m ∣ ≤ 1 .
By the triangle inequality, ∣ a ∣ = ∣ 2 k − 4 l + 2 m ∣ ≤ 2 ∣ k ∣ + 4 ∣ l ∣ + 2 ∣ m ∣ ≤ 8 . Also, ∣ b ∣ = ∣ 4 l − k − 3 m ∣ ≤ 4 ∣ l ∣ + ∣ k ∣ + 3 ∣ m ∣ ≤ 8 , and ∣ c ∣ = ∣ m ∣ ≤ 1 .
So ∣ a ∣ + ∣ b ∣ + ∣ c ∣ ≤ 1 7 .
At x = 0 p ( x ) = c therefore c = 1
Need to contain turning point in range so by symmetry turning point at x=0.5
Differentiating gives 2 a x + b = 0 at turning point so at x = 0 . 5 a = − b
Gives p ( x ) = a x 2 − a x + 1
p ( 0 . 5 ) = − 0 . 2 5 a + 1 & p ( 0 . 5 ) = − 1 to fit in constraint
so a = 8 b = − 8 c = 1
Ok, so let's picture this. By completing a square, any quadratic equation can be made into a parabola. We want as large a value for a,b,c, so we want our parabola to be less-flat. Flat parabolas have smaller a,b terms.
Let's pretend we want our parabola to open upwards (a>0). It should hit the points (0,1) (.5 , -1) (1,1). Why you ask? Try to draw the parabola and you'll see that this is the "steepest" parabola we can draw and satisfy the problem's conditions.
ax^2 + bx + c (0,1) means 1 = a(0^2) + b(0) + c; c=1 (1,1) means 1 = a(1^2) + b(1) + c; a + b = 0 (.5,-1) means -1 = a(1/4) + b(1/2) + c; (1/4)a + (1/2)b = -2 If you solve the system for a and b, you'll get that a=8 and b=-8
|8| + |-8| + |1| = 17
But wait, we need to check the case with a downward facing parabola that hits (0,-1) (.5,1) (1,-1). If you do the same process as before, you'll get a = -8, b = 8, c = -1
|-8| + |8| + |-1| = 17
The largest possible value of |a| + |b| + |c| is 17.
From this problem: \left |p(x)=ax^2+bx+c \right |\leq 1), where 0 ≤ x ≤ 1
Choose x = 0 , so ∣ c ∣ ≤ 1 so, for maximum ∣ a ∣ + ∣ b ∣ + ∣ c ∣ , we choose c = ∣ 1 ∣
C a s e f o r : c = 1
p ( x ) = a x 2 + b x + 1 , for x = 0 we get p ( x ) = 1 and this point consider p ( x ) maximum for this point,
For this case imposible for a ≤ 0
P r o v e :
set b = − a and we get:
a x 2 − a x ≥ 0 for 0 ≤ x ≤ 1
it's contradiction for p ( x ) ≥ 1
So, a positive number, and b must negative number (because if b are positive number for x = 1 , p ( x ) > 1 contradiction.)
And this case result a ≥ − b
Maximum p ( x ) = 1 and happened when x boundary point, p ( x ) have minimum for p ( x ) = − 1
we have axis of symetry for x = 2 1 if f ( 1 ) = 1
Minimum point happened when x = 2 1 so that a = − b
p ( x ) = a ( 2 1 ) 2 − a ( 2 1 ) + 1 = − 1 and we get a = − 8 ,
So that , ∣ a ∣ + ∣ b ∣ + ∣ c ∣ maximum if p ( x ) = 8 x 2 − 8 x + 1
C a s e f o r : c = − 1
with same way we get:
p ( x ) = − 8 x 2 + 8 x − 1
so, maximum
∣ a ∣ + ∣ b ∣ + ∣ c ∣ = 1 7
"Choose x = 0 , so ∣ c ∣ ≤ 1 so, for maximum ∣ a ∣ + ∣ b ∣ + ∣ c ∣ , we choose c = ∣ 1 ∣ " No guarantee that the maximum is at the boundary of the domain of conditions.
Log in to reply
It's long problem I think... ha ha ha... My solution is wrong....
Since p ( 0 ) = c , we know − 1 ≤ c ≤ 1 . Since p ( 1 ) = a + b + c , we know − 1 ≤ a + b + c ≤ 1 . Since p ( 2 1 ) = 4 1 a + 2 1 b + c , we know − 4 ≤ a + 2 b + 4 c ≤ 4 .
Since − 4 ≤ a + 2 b + 4 c ≤ 4 and − 1 ≤ a + b + c ≤ 1 , we get − 5 ≤ a + 2 b + 4 c − ( a + b + c ) ≤ 5 , or − 5 ≤ b + 3 c ≤ 5 . Combining this inequality with − 1 ≤ c ≤ 1 yields − 8 ≤ b ≤ 8 . Similarly, since − 4 ≤ a + 2 b + 4 c ≤ 4 and − 1 ≤ a + b + c ≤ 1 , we get − 6 ≤ a + 2 b + 4 c − 2 ( a + b + c ) ≤ 6 , which gives us − 6 ≤ − a + 2 c ≤ 6 . Combining this with − 1 ≤ c ≤ 1 yields the inequality − 8 ≤ a ≤ 8 . Therefore, ∣ a ∣ + ∣ b ∣ + ∣ c ∣ ≤ 8 + 8 + 1 = 1 7 .
To see that we cannot get any smaller, consider p ( x ) = 8 x 2 − 8 x + 1 . This polynomial satisfies the condition ∣ p ( x ) ∣ ≤ 1 for 0 ≤ x ≤ 1 , and ∣ a ∣ + ∣ b ∣ + ∣ c ∣ = 8 + 8 + 1 = 1 7 for this quadratic polynomial. Note also that p ( x ) = 8 ( x − 2 1 ) 2 − 1 , so this is a parabola with vertex at ( 2 1 , − 1 ) passing through the points ( 0 , 1 ) and ( 1 , 1 ) .
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Let α = p ( 0 ) , β = p ( 2 1 ) , and γ = p ( 1 ) . We know that ∣ α ∣ , ∣ β ∣ , and ∣ γ ∣ are all less than or equal to 1. We will use this information by first writing a, b, and c in terms of α , β , and γ . By substituting the definition of p(x), we have: c a + 2 b + 4 c a + b + c = = = α 4 β γ We then substitute α for c, obtaining: a + 2 b a + b = = 4 β − 4 α γ − α Subtracting these equations, we obtain: b = − 3 α + 4 β − γ We can then solve for a in the following manner: a + b + c a + ( − 3 α + 4 β − γ ) + α a = = = γ γ 2 α − 4 β + 2 γ In summary, we now have the following relationships: a b c = = = 2 α − 4 β + 2 γ − 3 α + 4 β − γ α It is clear from these relations, and from the fact that ∣ α ∣ , ∣ β ∣ , and ∣ γ ∣ are all less than or equal to 1, that ∣ a ∣ ≤ 8 , ∣ b ∣ ≤ 8 , and ∣ c ∣ ≤ 1 . Furthermore, all those maximum values can be obtained by letting ∣ α ∣ , ∣ β ∣ , and ∣ γ ∣ equal 1, and by letting the sign of β be the opposite of the signs of α and γ . These stipulations result in either p ( x ) = 8 x 2 − 8 x + 1 or p ( x ) = − 8 x 2 + 8 x − 1 . In either case, ∣ a ∣ + ∣ b ∣ + ∣ c ∣ = 17 .