∫ 0 π cos x d x ∫ π 2 π cos x d x ∫ 2 π 3 π cos x d x ∫ 3 π 4 π cos x d x = = = = ⋮ 0 0 0 0
Because all the equation above are true, is the following equation true as well?
∫ 0 ∞ cos x d x = = = ∫ 0 π cos x d x + ∫ π 2 π cos x d x + ∫ 2 π 3 π cos x d x + ⋯ 0 + 0 + 0 + ⋯ 0 .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
0 isn't a natural number.
beautiful solution..this is why we say that 0*infinity is an indeterminate value
This isn't the proof that ∫ 0 ∞ cos ( x ) = 0 . You'll have to take cos ( x ) = 2 e i x + e − i x and show that it diverges.
Log in to reply
We can also use methods other than the euler's formula, for example,
consider the series
∫
0
a
1
cos
x
d
x
,
∫
0
a
2
cos
x
d
x
,
⋯
If
a
n
=
n
π
, the series converge to
0
If
a
n
=
(
n
+
2
1
)
π
, the series converge to
1
Since they does not match, the series diverges.
The function F ( t ) = ∫ 0 t c o s ( x ) d x doesn't approach a limit when t goes towards infinity. The value of the funxtion is oscillating.
Looking at the macroscopic change in the value of the function does not tell us about the limit
Yeah exactly my thought. The sin(x) as antiderivative doesn't converge towards a limit, it diverges/oscillates.
Infinity is not clearly defined. For us to get zero as the answer, both the upper and lower limits need to be clearly defined in this case.
Infinity IS clearly defined.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
The given relations only tell us that
∫ m π k π cos ( x ) = 0 for all finite non-negative integers m and k . But that doesn't mean ∫ 0 ∞ c o s x = 0 .