Quinary Quantity Part 3

Logic Level 2

( + ) × ÷ \large \left( \square \ + \ \square \ - \ \square \ \right) \times \ \square \ \div \ \square

You are given that the numbers 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 1,2,3,4 and 5 5 are to be filled in the square boxes as shown above (without repetition).

Find the minimum possible value of the resultant number. Give your answer to 3 decimal places.


The answer is -2.667.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

Chew-Seong Cheong
Aug 11, 2015

The expression is equivalent to S = ( A + B C ) × D ÷ E S = (A+B-C)\times D \div E . For minimum S S , A + B C A+B-C must be minimum, which is 1 + 2 5 = 2 1+2-5=-2 , D D and E E be the maximum and minimum with the remaining numbers, that is, D = 4 D=4 and E = 3 E=3 . Therefore, S m i n = ( 2 ) × 4 ÷ 3 = 2.667 S_{min} = (-2) \times 4 \div 3 = \boxed{-2.667} .

I donno if I am stupid or what. I do believe we have to do this according to BODMAS. and I dont see any brackets in the problem.

SO my answer is

2+3-5*4/1

which gives -15

5*4/1=20

2+3-20=-15

I dont see any brackets in the question. Try typing my answer in any std calculator. Please tell me if I am wrong.

Ritwik Gopi - 5 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

It is mentioned that: By strictly applying the operations from left to right \color{#D61F06}{\text{By strictly applying the operations from left to right}} . The BODMAS problem is Part 4 .

Chew-Seong Cheong - 5 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

oops my bad

Ritwik Gopi - 5 years, 10 months ago

It said "strictly applying the operations from left to right." Of course you don't use the brackets. Clearly said,clearly done

Caeo Tan - 5 years, 5 months ago

Yes you are

Stefano Prosperi - 4 years, 11 months ago

I also think so gopi

Shaid Hasan Niloy - 5 years, 4 months ago

I thought the answer was -15 too!

Elena Gomes - 5 years, 10 months ago

same result ^^

Felixx Felixx - 5 years, 6 months ago

I agree that S m i n = 8 3 = 2.667 S_{min}=\frac{-8}{3}=\boxed{-2.667} . However, I am not sure that A + B C A+B-C must be a minimum is so obvious. It is obvious that A + B C A+B-C must be negative, which means that C could be 4 or 5, with A and B being a combination of 1, 2, or 3 can provide negative numbers. It just so happens that A+B-C should be a minimum for this problem but I think a complete solution would need to show the above combinations to truly show that S is minimized when A + B C A+B-C is minimized, unless there is a principle I am missing here.

The combinations being: A=1, B=2 ,or vice versa, C=4, D=5, and E=3 gives S = 5 3 S=\frac{-5}{3}

A=1, B =2, or vice versa, C=5, D=4, and E=3 gives S = 8 3 S=\boxed{\frac{-8}{3}} , our answer

A=1, B=3, or vice versa, C=5, D=4, and E=2 gives S = 2 S=-2

Scott Ripperda - 5 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

I found one solution that gives less its 2+3-4 5/1 2+3-4 5 2+3-20 5-20 -15

zain ali - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

( 2 + 3 4 ) 5 / 1 = 5 (2+3-4)5/1 = 5

Chew-Seong Cheong - 5 years, 1 month ago

I used some python code, and went through the possible combinations. If you use 23451 \boxed{2 3 4 5 1} you get -15. I thought that it might be asking for the positive answers online, but if you use 12345 \boxed{1 2 3 4 5} you get 0.6? I am very confused, please explain.

massimo 22 - 3 years, 6 months ago

If we consider magnitude the least value is 0.002

Siobhan Doran - 3 years, 1 month ago

My error was assuming that minimum meant the smallest absolute value rather than simply being furthest to the left on the real number line. My first result was 0

Joshua Burton - 5 years, 1 month ago

my answer was also -15

Bhaskar Pandey - 4 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

It cannot be -15 because you have to do the parenthesis first

Luke Spooner - 2 years, 2 months ago
Kartik Agarwal
Dec 13, 2015

the solution is (1+2-5)*4/3

I agree and I get -3.66...

Larry McCandless - 5 years, 6 months ago

Andrea it equals 0. (2+3=5-5=0)*4=0/1=0.

hi taco - 2 years, 2 months ago

what's about 2+3-5*4/1 ? It's -14

Andrea Virgillito - 4 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

*-15 obvl :)

Andrea Virgillito - 4 years, 10 months ago

okay....now i've got the ans was -2.667..

Andrea Virgillito - 4 years, 10 months ago

ya ,I also have the same doubt

Adarsh Adi - 4 years, 6 months ago

If u put 2 plus 3 then minus 4 multiple 5 decided to 1 🔚all equal -15#

Ahmed Ammar - 4 years, 3 months ago
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
from itertools import permutations
from math import isinf

perm = permutations([1, 2, 3, 4, 5])

min_ = isinf
max_ = 0
max_permutation = ''
min_permutation = ''

for i in list(perm):
    x = float(i[0]+i[1]-i[2])*i[3]/i[4]
    if x < min_:
        min_ = x
        min_permutation = i
    if x > max_:
        max_ = x
        max_permutation = i


print 'Min: %0.3f; (%d+%d-%d)*%d/%d\n' %(min_, min_permutation[0], min_permutation[1], \
           min_permutation[2], min_permutation[3], min_permutation[4])

print 'Max: %0.3f; (%d+%d-%d)*%d/%d' %(max_, max_permutation[0], max_permutation[1], \
           max_permutation[2], max_permutation[3], max_permutation[4])

1
2
3
Min: -2.667; (1+2-5)*4/3

Max: 25.000; (3+4-2)*5/1

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...