□ □ + □ □ + □ □
Six numbers 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , and 6 are to be filled in the square boxes above (without repetition). Of all 6 ! = 7 2 0 possible arrangements, find the minimum value of the resultant number.
Details and Assumptions
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
How do we know that's the minimum?
Log in to reply
Bcoz there is no repetition of given numbers,we must take aravind Raj's solution
Log in to reply
How can we think this method to proceed to get the solution.
You can't do do anything other than this solution
To be frank; I used more of logical reasoning. If we have two numbers; take
X & Y
S u p p o s e X > Y
T h e n f o r s u r e ; X Y < Y X
Note : This does not apply if 1 or 0 are either of the numbers and/or the first 3 natural numbers are used in a pair. i.e 3 2 > 2 3 .
6 being the last number cannot stay as the base as that would cause the least value of its would be 6. So we take 1 6 as that would be the least value of all.
We have 2,3,4 and 5 left.
Taking a sample space of all;
2 3 ; 2 4 ; 2 5
3 2 : 3 4 : 3 5
4 2 : 4 3 : 4 5
5 2 : 5 3 : 5 4
From the above sample space; the least value without repeating its value are:
5 2 & 4 3 .
Adding all:
1 6 + 5 2 + 4 3 .= 1 + 2 5 + 6 4 = 9 0
Log in to reply
I saw your post after I posted my solution. They are pretty much the same. I am sorry.
After starting logically you could have continued doing so rather than using brute force. Let's see if I am right
After sorting out 1 and 6 we are left with 2 3 4 and 5. Let's take 5. What is the minimum number we can get by using 5 as a base and any other as an exponent or vice versa. The obvious solution would be 5^2. That leaves us with 3 and 4 and using your X and Y conclusion it is obvious that 4^3 is smaller than 3^4. If you look at my solution you will find that this will work with any count of numbers.
To ensure that you would be getting the minimum number, take 1 and the maximum value which is 6 and use 1 as a base since in 1 n whatever value n may be, the result would still be 1.
Now that we have the first addend, the numbers left would be 2,3,4, and 5. In the possible combinations that we can get from those numbers, which would be:
2 3 = 8
2 4 = 1 6
2 5 = 3 2
3 2 = 9
3 4 = 8 1
3 5 = 2 4 3
4 2 = 1 6
4 3 = 6 4
4 5 = 1 0 2 4
5 2 = 2 5
5 3 = 1 2 5
5 4 = 6 2 5
the numbers that would produce the least value without repetition would be 5 2 and 4 3
Hence:
1 + 5 2 + 4 3 = 9 0
The answer is 90.
I think I have got a strategy for this type of problems but would be very grateful if someone could prove or disprove it. It is as follows.
1. Put the numbers in ascending order numbering them 1,2,3, ...n-2, n-1, n
2. Now the numbers to add would be n^1, (n-1)^2, (n-2)^3...
3. One exception is if the first number is 1 then the first term would be 1^n, instead.
4. Another unique case is when there are just 4 numbers and they are 1, 2, 3 and 4. In that case the numbers would be 1^4 and 2^3.
5. I think this would work for any pair of numbers even if they are not consecutive.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
1 6 + 5 2 + 4 3 ; 1 + 2 5 + 6 4 = 9 0