This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Let denote, R 1 , R 2 , R 3 be first second and third rows of above given matrix then,
Clearly, R 3 = 2 • R 2 − R 1 so that, R 3 is Linearly dependent on R 1 , R 2 and one can check R 1 , R 2 are linearly independent(since they are not multiple of each other!) Hence, R a n k ( A ) = 2
But by Rank-nullity theorem we know,
R a n k ( A ) + n u l l i t y ( A ) = number of columns of A
→ 2 + n u l l i t y ( A ) = 4
→ n u l l i t y ( A ) = 2
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Relevant wiki: subspace
3 t h row = − ( 2 t h − 2 ⋅ 1 t h )
and 2 t h and 1 t h rows are linearly independent ⇒ Rank A = 2 , and due to dim( Ker A) + Rank A = 4 (first theorem for isomorhism in vector spaces) we get nullity of A = 2 = dim(Ker A)