Clearly, 1 + 1 1 = 2 .
Does there exist another positive rational number r , such that the sum of the number and its reciprocal is an integer?
r + r 1 ∈ N , r = 1 , r ∈ Q +
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Great! And this easily extends to finding solutions to r + r k ∈ N . It tells us that we only need to test the factors of k , and clearly all of them are going to be solutions :)
But the problem clearly states: "Does there exist another positive rational number r ..." So the case r = -1 need not be considered. Further, the problem states: "...the sum of the number and its reciprocal is an integer". -1 + -1 = -2, which is clearly an integer. So the initial restriction, r > 0, is the important condition.
Let r = q p where g c d ( p , q ) = 1 and q = 1
q p + p q = I whre I ∈ N
p 2 + q 2 = p q I
q p 2 + q = p I
q p 2 = p I − q
As we previously assumed that p , q are co-prime so q ∤ p 2 .L.H.S. is not an integer but R.H.S. is an integer.This contradicts that no rational exists.
Note: It is not quite sufficient to assume that q = 1 , because you missed out a subset of rational numbers in that case.
Log in to reply
Yes I have missed out that. Can you suggest me how to do this in my solution??
Log in to reply
Just deal with it separately.
If
q
=
1
,
…
.
Note that under this scenario, we should be able to conclude that
p
=
1
.
Suppose r + r 1 = n for some n ∈ N . (Note that by the AM-GM inequality we know that n ≥ 2 .)
Then r 2 − n r + 1 = 0 ⟹ r = 2 n ± n 2 − 4 .
For r to be rational we will require that n 2 − 4 be a perfect square, i.e., that n 2 − 4 = m 2 ⟹ n 2 − m 2 = 4 for some m ∈ N ∪ { 0 } . But this is only the case for ( n , m ) = ( 2 , 0 ) , which yields the unique solution r = 1 , and thus there is N o other such positive rational number r .
(Note that n 2 − m 2 = ( n + m ) ( n − m ) = 4 with n > m ≥ 0 implies that either
(i) n + m = 4 , n − m = 1 ⟹ 2 n = 5 , i.e., n ∈ / N , or
(ii) n + m = 2 , n − m = 2 ⟹ n = 2 , m = 0 .)
There is a faster approach applying the rational root theorem directly to the quadratic, telling us that r ∈ ± 1 1 .
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
As suggested by Calvin. Here's the rational root theorem (RRT) approach:
Suppose there exists a positive integer n that satisfy this condition, then r + r 1 = n ⇔ r 2 + 1 = n r ⇔ r 2 − n r + 1 = 0 .
Since we just want to find the rational roots of this equation, then RRT is sufficient. All the possible rational roots ( r ) of the quadratic equation r 2 − n r + 1 = 0 are
± all the positive factors of the leading coefficient all the positive factors of the constant term = ± all the positive factors of 1 all the positive factors of 1 = ± 1 .
So we just need to check whether r = ± 1 yields a positive integer n . The original question already shown that r = 1 satisfy this condition and we're looking for other solutions.
We just need to check for r = − 1 only, but upon substitution, we can see that r + r 1 is not a positive integer, so there's NO other solution.