Rectangles, not Squares

28 24 26 22

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Trevor B.
Feb 26, 2014

In a figure like that, where parallel lines intersect each other at right angles to form a grid of squares, if there are a a horizontal parallel lines intersecting b b vertical parallel lines, then the number of rectangles that can be formed is equal to this. ( a 2 ) × ( b 2 ) . \binom{a}{2}\times\binom{b}{2}. Plugging in a = b = 4 , a=b=4, the number of rectangles in the figure is equal to this. ( 4 2 ) × ( 4 2 ) = 6 × 6 = 36. \dbinom{4}{2}\times\dbinom{4}{2}=6\times6=36.

The number of squares that appear in an n × n n\times n grid of squares is equal to this. k = 1 n k 2 \sum_{k=1}^nk^2 Plugging in n = 3 n=3 yields 1 + 4 + 9 = 14 1+4+9=14 squares in the figure.

Finally, the number of rectangles that aren't squares in the figure is equal to 36 14 = 22 36-14=\boxed{22}

did it same way

MAYYANK GARG - 7 years, 2 months ago
Satyam Choudhary
Mar 25, 2014

I didnlt have a formula type approach to this problem. I did this by looking and forming the rectangles. Please explain me the formula that you ( trevor B ) used.

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...