Remainders Are Fun 2

Algebra Level 4

Find the remainder when the polynomial n = 1 672 x 3 n \displaystyle \large \sum_{n = 1}^{672} x^{3n} is divided by the polynomial n = 0 2 x n ? \displaystyle \large\sum_{n = 0}^2 x^n \ ?


For more problems like this, try answering this set .


The answer is 672.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Christian Daang
Feb 21, 2017

By Remainder Theorem ,
n = 0 2 x n = 0 ( x 1 ) ( n = 0 2 x n ) = 0 x 3 = 1 Since ( x 3 1 ) m o d ( n = 0 2 x n ) 0 x 3 m o d ( n = 0 2 x n ) 1 and hence, x 3 n m o d ( n = 0 2 x n ) 1 n = 1 672 x 3 n m o d ( n = 0 2 x n ) n = 1 672 1 m o d ( n = 0 2 x n ) 672 m o d ( n = 0 2 x n ) = 672 \displaystyle \large \begin{aligned} \sum_{n = 0}^2 x^n = 0 \Longleftrightarrow (x - 1) \left( \sum_{n = 0}^2 x^n \right ) = 0 \Longleftrightarrow x^3 = 1 \\ \text{Since} \ (x^3 - 1) \mod \left( \sum_{n = 0}^2 x^n \right ) \equiv 0 \implies x^3 \mod \left( \sum_{n = 0}^2 x^n \right ) \equiv 1 \ \text{and hence,} \ x^{3n} \mod \left( \sum_{n = 0}^2 x^n \right ) \equiv 1 \\ \implies \sum_{n = 1}^{672} x^{3n} \mod \left( \sum_{n = 0}^2 x^n \right ) & \equiv \sum_{n = 1}^{672} 1 \mod \left( \sum_{n = 0}^2 x^n \right ) \\ & \equiv 672 \mod \left( \sum_{n = 0}^2 x^n \right ) \\ & = \boxed{672} \end{aligned}

While the answer is correct, the solution makes a lot of errors with modular arithmetic.

I have no idea what your solution is expressing. To calculate ( m o d x 2 + x + 1 ) \pmod {x^2 + x + 1} , you seem to be sayig that we can calculate ( m o d x 3 ) \pmod{ x^3 } . Specifically, the only evidence that you seem to have for x 3 n 1 m o d x 2 + x + 1 x^{3n} \equiv 1 \mod { x^2 + x + 1 } , is to say that x 3 n 0 ( m o d x 3 ) x^{3n} \equiv 0 \pmod{x^3} .

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

Sir, I already edited my solution. :D

Christian Daang - 4 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

Looks better. I would advice you to write 1 + x + x 2 1 + x + x^2 instead of that summation sign. This makes it unnecessarily harder to read, as one then has to actively track what the summation is until.

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years, 3 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...