Let be a non-trivial set of integers i.e. and We call such a set a " remarkable set of type " if it has the following properties:
If is an element of then is also an element of .
If is an element of , then is also an elements of .
If are elements of (not necessarily different), then is also an element of .
How many (non-trivial) remarkable sets of type 18 are there?
Bonus: Generalize. If = is the prime factorization of , how many non-trivial remarkable sets of type exist? What do they look like?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Let b be the smallest positive element in A . Then − b ∈ A by rule 1, and by rule 3, all k b ∈ A for all odd k .
There are now two possibilities:
0 ∈ A , in which case (by rule 2 again) k b ∈ A for all k : A ⊇ { … , − 4 b , − 3 b , − 2 b , − b , 0 , b , 2 b , 3 b , 4 b , … }
0 ∈ A , in which case k b ∈ A for all odd k . A ⊇ { … , − 5 b , − 3 b , − b , b , 3 b , 5 b , … }
In fact, equality holds in either case: set A contains no other elements. Proof: if a ∈ A is not an odd multiple of k g , use rule 3 repeatedly to add or subtract 2 b until you find a number a ′ strictly between − b and + b . If a ′ < 0 , swap it out for − a ′ > 0 , which must also be an element by rule 1. Then either a ′ = 0 , showing that a = k b for even k ; or 0 < a < b , which contradicts the assumption that b is minimal.
Now use rule 2 to conclude that N should be a multiple of the "step size" in A : b ∣ N (first case) or 2 b ∣ N (i.e. b ∣ 2 1 N , provided N is even) (second case). In the first case we must rule out b = 1 because then A = Z trivially. For N = 1 8 we find
five sets of the first kind: b = 2 , 3 , 6 , 9 , 1 8 A 1 = { … , − 8 , − 6 , − 4 , − 2 , 0 , 2 , 4 , 6 , 8 , … } A 2 = { … , − 1 2 , − 9 , − 6 , − 3 , 0 , 3 , 6 , 9 , 1 2 , … } A 3 = { … , − 2 4 , − 1 8 , − 1 2 , − 6 , 0 , 6 , 1 2 , 1 8 , 2 4 , … } A 4 = { … , − 3 6 , − 2 7 , − 1 8 , − 9 , 0 , 9 , 1 8 , 2 7 , 3 6 , … } A 5 = { … , − 7 2 , − 5 4 , − 3 6 , − 1 8 , 0 , 1 8 , 3 6 , 5 4 , 7 2 , … }
three sets of the second kind: b = 1 , 3 , 9 A 6 = { … , − 7 , − 5 , − 3 , − 1 , 1 , 3 , 5 , 7 , … } A 7 = { … , − 2 1 , − 1 5 , − 9 , − 3 , 3 , 9 , 1 5 , 2 1 , … } A 8 = { … , − 6 3 , − 4 5 , − 2 7 , − 9 , 9 , 2 7 , 4 5 , 6 3 , … }
The answer to the problem is: there exist eight remarkable sets of type 1 8 .
In general, the number of sets A of the given description is n ( N ) = ( τ ( N ) − 1 ) + τ ( 2 1 N ) , where τ ( x ) is the number of positive divisors of x . Given the prime factor decomposition N = 2 e 2 ⋅ 3 e 3 ⋅ 5 e 5 ⋯ p e p ⋯ , this becomes n ( N ) = ( 2 e 2 + 1 ) ⋅ ( e 3 + 1 ) ⋅ ( e 5 + 1 ) ⋯ ( e p + 1 ) ⋯ − 1 . (Check: if N = 1 8 then e 2 = 1 , e 3 = 2 , and n ( N ) = ( 2 + 1 ) ⋅ ( 2 + 1 ) − 1 = 3 ⋅ 3 − 1 = 8 .)