Let p ( x ) be a non-constant polynomial function such that there exists a real number a for which p ( a ) = 0 , p ′ ( a ) = 0 , p ′ ′ ( a ) = 0 .
True or False?
At least one root of p ( x ) is non-real.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Nice proof.
Great proof !! Thank you.
Relevant wiki: Vieta's Formula Problem Solving - Advanced
By translation, we can assume, without loss of generality, that a = 0 . Then we are told that p ( x ) = a n x n + a n − 1 x n − 1 + ⋯ + a 3 x 3 + a 2 x 2 + a 1 x + a 0 where a 2 = a 1 = 0 and a 0 = 0 . If the roots of p ( x ) are α 1 , α 2 , . . . , α n , then we know, using Vieta's Formulae, that the roots are all nonzero and that j = 1 ∑ n α j − 1 = − a 0 a 1 = 0 1 ≤ j < k ≤ n ∑ α j − 1 α k − 1 = a 0 a 2 = 0 It follows that j = 1 ∑ n α j − 2 = ( j = 1 ∑ n α j − 1 ) 2 − 2 1 ≤ j < k ≤ n ∑ α j − 1 α k − 1 = 0 which makes it impossible for all the α j to be real.
A simple example would be p(x) = x^4 + x^3 + i, where x = 0
One example of a function that meets the criteria and has non-real roots doesn't mean all functions that meet the criteria will have non-real roots. If these questions were asking for a single example they would be very easy.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Relevant wiki: Remainder Factor Theorem - Advanced
Let f ( x ) = A ( x − r 1 ) ( x − r 2 ) ⋯ ( x − r n ) , with r i the complex or real roots (with multiplicity) and A = 0 . Then
f ′ ( x ) = f ( x ) i ∑ x − r i 1
If f ′ ( a ) = 0 but f ( a ) = 0 , then the sum ∑ a − r i 1 = 0 . Also,
f ′ ′ ( x ) = f ( x ) i = j ∑ ( x − r i ) ( x − r j ) 1 = f ( x ) ( i ∑ x − r i 1 ) 2 − f ( x ) i ∑ ( x − r i ) 2 1 = f ( x ) ( f ′ ( x ) ) 2 − f ( x ) i ∑ ( x − r i ) 2 1 .
If f ( a ) = 0 , f ′ ( a ) = 0 , and f ′ ′ ( a ) = 0 then also the last term ∑ ( a − r i ) 2 1 = 0 . But this requires some of the ( a − r i ) 2 to have a negative real part; hence some r i are complex.