Three circles fit inside a square as shown where two small circles touch a large circle. Given that the radius of the small circles is 3 and the side length of the square is 14, find the radius of the larger circle to one decimal place.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Why are the following three points collinear?
Log in to reply
Those points of any two circles touching each other will satisfy collinearity. They're touching each other so they have common tangent and also common normal passing through the point of contact. So they're collinear. If you still are not satisfied, just take some convenient coordinate system to locate those three points by taking radii as variables and you can see that the area of triangle formed by those points is zero.
I used a simpler approach though not rigorous I got the answer. From just observing I proved that
4<R<5 Also R lies towards the middle of the interval so I tried 4.5 and then 4.6
I used a different approach, based on the assumption that the lines connecting the small and large circles is always 45ª. This gives a wrong answer, however, I cannot see why the assumption is wrong.
I have my solution to show different approach but your is better and have voted for yours.
Did the same!
Let x equal the radius of the big ass circle. By doing some math, we get:
x 2 + 6 x − 7 + x + 3 = 1 4
This gives us x = 4 . 6
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Let R be the radius of the larger circle. Notice that the red triangle is isosceles.
After using Pythagoras: ( 1 1 − R ) 2 + 4 2 = ( 3 + R ) 2
Solving gives R = 7 3 2 = 4 . 6
Click here to access image.