This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
x x x x . . = 4 4 l n x = l n 4 This process will yield the same result
So it becomes a contradiction again.
Log in to reply
No... how do you get 4 ln x = 4 ?
Log in to reply
Sorry I did a mistake there. Thanks a lot for the question, I learned something new today. Thanks for the solution. :)
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
First attempt: x ( x x x ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ) = 4 implies that x 4 = 4 . This means that x = ± 2 . However, if x < 0 and x x x x ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ is well-defined, then x = − 1 . This means that x = − 2 and hence x = 2 .
Everything seems alright now.
Checking: Let a 0 = 2 and a n + 1 = ( 2 ) a n for all n ≥ 0 . Then we see that a 0 < 2 and a_1=\sqrt{2}^\sqrt{2}<\sqrt{2}^2=2 . We can show that a n < 2 for all n (by induction or some other method). Note that if x = 2 , then 4 = x x x x ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ = lim n → ∞ a n < 2 , a contradiction!
In fact, one can check that if x x x x ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ = a has solution for x , then a = − 1 or 0 < a ≤ e ≈ 2 . 7 1 8 .