This resistive network forms an infinite binary tree--every branch splits into two new branches, where the new branch that goes to the left has a resistance of R x , and the one that goes to the right has a resistance of R y .
Suppose that after going down n levels, all of the branches are connected to a single node, B . As n approaches infinity, what will be the equivalent resistance between nodes A and B ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
@Novak Radivojević just a small suggestion : you should add the bonus problem thing on the question itself.
Log in to reply
I was going to do that initially, but i was afraid that doing so might somewhat reveal the correct answer, or help solvers eliminate some of the wrong answers... Now that I think of it, maybe it's not a big deal after all. I can't edit the problem now, but thank you for your suggestion! :)
(Rx + Ry)/2 can be formed with Ry in parallel with itself and then that is in series with Rx being in parallel with itself.
Log in to reply
That's right, but what about the quadratic mean?
2/((1/Rx)+(1/Ry)) can be formed by Rx and Ry in parallel twice in a row (the same thing in series again)
@Novak Radivojević yes no problem.
More simple: taking Rx = 0, nor "a" nor "b" solutions are valid. Assuming now Rx infinite, "c" solution will be 2*Ry, also not valid. Only "d" solution is valid for both extreme situations....
Actually as per the choices it can easily be seen that it is geometric mean because if rx or ry is zero the net resistance is also zero as there will be one path with no resistance and rnet is zero.
Isn't all this math incoherent, since every path down the tree has an infinite number of resistors in series, therefore an infinite resistance?
Set the equivalent resistance to R . Now, as the tree is infinite, the two trees under the first split have a equivalent resistance of R as well.
Setting the left resistor's resistance to x and the right one to y , we have the following:
R 1 = x + R 1 + y + R 1
Multiplying everything by R , x + R and y + R , we get ( x + R ) ( y + R ) = R ( x + y + 2 R )
Distributing and cancelling: x y = R 2 ⟹ R = x y
Take out the initial R x and R y resistances. Since the circuit is so large it doesn't matter if we take out 2 .
(try solving the equation infinity - 2 = ?)
now exactly as novak has described we get a circuit consisting of 2 arms the resistance is R + R x in one arm and R + R y in another. These are in parallel with each other so,
1 / ( R + R x ) + 1 / ( R + R y ) = 1 / R . This gives quadratic in R . Solving we get R 2 = R x R y showing that R is geometric mean of R x and R y .
Edit : Sep 7, I have not done electricity in detail yet but Rohit Gupta asked what the result would be if the resistors were all capacitors,And I worked it out and the same result follows : C e q u i v a l e n t 2 = C x C y
The given network is an example of an infinite geometric series since there is a constant ratio between the parent nodes and the child nodes. So of course you have to use the geometric mean.
Would the answer be same if we have used capacitors instead of resistors in a similar way?
How do you find that the ratio between parent and child node is constant?
Rohit Gupta if we had used capacitors the answer would be the same.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Relevant wiki: Simple Circuits
Take two copies of this network - left and right copy. Connect R x to the node A of the left copy, and R y to the node A of the right copy. Now, connect these two copies in parallel. You'll get exactly the same circuit you started with!
This means that the total resistance of this new network is equal to the total resistance of our starting network:
Where
R
t
o
t
is the total resistance of the starting network.
So:
R
x
+
R
t
o
t
1
+
R
y
+
R
t
o
t
1
(
R
x
+
R
t
o
t
)
(
R
y
+
R
t
o
t
)
R
x
+
R
y
+
2
R
t
o
t
(
R
x
+
R
t
o
t
)
(
R
y
+
R
t
o
t
)
R
t
o
t
2
+
R
t
o
t
(
R
x
+
R
y
)
+
R
x
R
y
R
t
o
t
2
R
t
o
t
=
R
t
o
t
1
=
R
t
o
t
1
=
(
R
x
+
R
y
+
2
R
t
o
t
)
R
t
o
t
=
2
R
t
o
t
2
+
R
t
o
t
(
R
x
+
R
y
)
=
R
x
R
y
=
R
x
R
y
Bonus problem: using only resistances of R x and R y , create resistive networks so that their total resistances are equal to each of the wrong answers...