A set of consecutive positive integers beginning with 1 is written on a blackboard. One number is erased. The average (arithmetic mean) of the remaining numbers is 1 7 6 0 2 . What number was erased ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Yes, we have other solutions as well but when we put n=18,35 or 52 we get x negative and we get 1st positive value of x at n=69. After that we can put n as 86,103,120 and so on but they will give a value of x which is greater than n which is not possible as x is the number we removed from set of n numbers so how can x be larger than n. So only value of n is 69 and only value of x is 7.
I have improved my solution. Hope you like it.
Denote n to be the number of numbers and k to be the number erased.
Thus, this implies that n − 1 2 n ( n + 1 ) − k = 1 7 6 0 2
You can continue from this and bash using mods and number theory techniques, but I solved this using using a very elementary method.
Notice how the denominator of the average is 1 7 . This implies that n ≡ 1 (mod 17) . We also know that 4 3 ∣ 6 0 2 ⟹ n > 4 3 .
Now we check n = 5 2 which does not work.
Then check n = 6 9 , and ... it works with k = 7 !
As you check more and more cases it becomes evident that it is not possible for the conditions to hold true, you can prove this rigorously using induction.
Therefore, the erased number is 7 .
There is a typo. You wrote 602/7
First recognise that the average is 1 7 6 0 2 = 3 5 . 4 1 This indicates that the maximum number in the set should be around 70.
The set 1 , 2 , 3 , . . . 7 1 leads to an average too big, even if you remove the largest number (71). The set 1 , 2 , 3 , . . . , 6 8 leads to an average too small, even if you remove the smallest possible number number (1).
Thus the largest digit is either n = 6 9 or n = 7 0
Taking the same equation as line 2 of Alan's solution, make the RHS 1 7 ( n − 1 ) ( 6 0 2 )
For an integer solution, 17 must divide ( n − 1 ) . Thus n = 6 9 , giving n − 1 = 6 8 Then solve for k as Alan's equation.
Hi. Could you please tell why the maximum number of elements in the set are 70? Thanks.
Log in to reply
Consider the set of numbers 1 , 2 , 3 , . . . , 7 1 . Remove one element and calculate the average of the rest of the set. No matter which number you remove, the average will be at least 35.5. But 1 7 6 0 2 ≈ 3 5 . 4 , so the set cannot contain 71, or any numbers above 71.
A similar reasoning can be made to show why stopping the set at 68, i.e. 1 , 2 , 3 , . . . , 6 8 does not allow the average to be large enough.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Let n be the number of terms of the sequence and x be the number erased. Then, we have:
n − 1 2 n ( n + 1 ) − x 2 n ( n + 1 ) − x ⇒ x = 1 7 6 0 2 = 1 7 6 0 2 ( n − 1 ) = 2 n ( n + 1 ) − 1 7 6 0 2 ( n − 1 )
For integer x to be an integer, n − 1 must be divisible by 1 7 . Therefore, n − 1 = 1 7 m ⇒ n = 1 7 m + 1 , where m is a positive integer.
We also note that 0 < x < n , therefore,
0 < 2 n ( n + 1 ) − 1 7 6 0 2 ( n − 1 ) < n 0 < 2 ( 1 7 m + 1 ) ( 1 7 m + 2 ) − 6 0 2 m < 1 7 m + 1 0 < 2 8 9 m 2 − 1 1 5 3 m + 2 < 3 4 m + 2
⇒ { 2 8 9 m 2 − 1 1 5 3 m + 2 > 0 2 8 9 m 2 − 1 1 5 3 m + 2 < 3 4 m + 2 ⇒ 2 8 9 m 2 − 1 1 8 7 m < 0 ⇒ m > 3 . 9 8 7 8 8 4 0 1 7 ⇒ m < 4 . 1 0 7 2 6 6 4 3 6
⇒ 3 . 9 8 7 < m < 4 . 1 0 7 ⇒ m n x = 4 = 1 7 ( 4 ) + 1 = 6 9 = 2 ( 6 9 ) ( 7 0 ) − 6 0 2 ( 4 ) = 7