RMO practice question 6

Algebra Level 4

A set of consecutive positive integers beginning with 1 1 is written on a blackboard. One number is erased. The average (arithmetic mean) of the remaining numbers is 602 17 \dfrac{602}{17} . What number was erased ?


The answer is 7.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

4 solutions

Let n n be the number of terms of the sequence and x x be the number erased. Then, we have:

n ( n + 1 ) 2 x n 1 = 602 17 n ( n + 1 ) 2 x = 602 ( n 1 ) 17 x = n ( n + 1 ) 2 602 ( n 1 ) 17 \begin{aligned} \frac{\frac{n(n+1)}{2}-x}{n-1} & = \frac{602}{17} \\ \frac{n(n+1)}{2}-x & = \frac{602(n-1)}{17} \\ \Rightarrow x & = \frac{n(n+1)}{2} - \frac{602(n-1)}{17} \end{aligned}

For integer x x to be an integer, n 1 n-1 must be divisible by 17 17 . Therefore, n 1 = 17 m n-1=17m n = 17 m + 1 \Rightarrow n = 17m+1 , where m m is a positive integer.

We also note that 0 < x < n 0 < x < n , therefore,

0 < n ( n + 1 ) 2 602 ( n 1 ) 17 < n 0 < ( 17 m + 1 ) ( 17 m + 2 ) 2 602 m < 17 m + 1 0 < 289 m 2 1153 m + 2 < 34 m + 2 0 < \dfrac{n(n+1)}{2} - \dfrac{602(n-1)}{17} < n \\ 0 < \dfrac{(17m+1)(17m+2)}{2} - 602m < 17m+1 \\ 0 < 289m^2-1153m+2 < 34m+2

{ 289 m 2 1153 m + 2 > 0 m > 3.987884017 289 m 2 1153 m + 2 < 34 m + 2 289 m 2 1187 m < 0 m < 4.107266436 \Rightarrow \begin{cases} 289m^2-1153m+2 > 0 & & \Rightarrow m > 3.987884017 \\ 289m^2-1153m+2 < 34m + 2 & \Rightarrow 289m^2-1187m < 0 & \Rightarrow m < 4.107266436 \end{cases}

3.987 < m < 4.107 m = 4 n = 17 ( 4 ) + 1 = 69 x = ( 69 ) ( 70 ) 2 602 ( 4 ) = 7 \begin{aligned} \Rightarrow 3.987 < m < 4.107 \quad \Rightarrow m & = 4 \\ n & = 17(4)+1 = 69 \\ x & = \frac{(69)(70)}{2} - 602(4) = \boxed{7} \end{aligned}

Yes, we have other solutions as well but when we put n=18,35 or 52 we get x negative and we get 1st positive value of x at n=69. After that we can put n as 86,103,120 and so on but they will give a value of x which is greater than n which is not possible as x is the number we removed from set of n numbers so how can x be larger than n. So only value of n is 69 and only value of x is 7.

Kushagra Sahni - 5 years, 9 months ago

I have improved my solution. Hope you like it.

Chew-Seong Cheong - 5 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Excellent Solution Sir.

Kushagra Sahni - 5 years, 9 months ago
Alan Yan
Sep 7, 2015

Denote n n to be the number of numbers and k k to be the number erased.

Thus, this implies that n ( n + 1 ) 2 k n 1 = 602 17 \frac{\frac{n(n+1)}{2} - k}{n-1} = \frac{602}{17}

You can continue from this and bash using mods and number theory techniques, but I solved this using using a very elementary method.

Notice how the denominator of the average is 17 17 . This implies that n 1 (mod 17) n \equiv 1 \text{ (mod 17) } . We also know that 43 602 n > 43 43 | 602 \implies n > 43 .

Now we check n = 52 n = 52 which does not work.

Then check n = 69 n = 69 , and ... it works with k = 7 k = 7 !

As you check more and more cases it becomes evident that it is not possible for the conditions to hold true, you can prove this rigorously using induction.

Therefore, the erased number is 7 \boxed{7} .

There is a typo. You wrote 602/7

Kushagra Sahni - 5 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks for pointing that out!

Alan Yan - 5 years, 9 months ago
Uahbid Dey
Sep 11, 2015
  1. Since consecutive positive integers and starts from 1 1 , and after removing one number the average becomes as 602 17 = 35.4118... \frac{602}{17}=35.4118... , hence the total number, n n would be somewhere around 35.4118 × 2 = 70.8 35.4118\times 2 = 70.8 , say 71 71 .
  2. Also, since the fraction has a denominator of 17 17 , so, n 1 n-1 is divisible by 17 17 . And we can easily see that 68 68 is the nearest number divisible by 17 17 . Hence, n = 68 + 1 = 69 n=68+1=69 .
  3. Now, assuming x x be the missing number, a/q, 602 17 = 1 + 2 + 3 + . . . + 69 x 68 = 69 × 70 2 x 68 \frac{602}{17}=\frac{1+2+3+...+69-x}{68}=\frac{\frac{69\times 70}{2}-x}{68} gives the missing number to be 7 7 .
Kevin Nolan
Sep 9, 2015

First recognise that the average is 602 17 = 35.41 \frac{602}{17} = 35.41 This indicates that the maximum number in the set should be around 70.

The set 1 , 2 , 3 , . . . 71 {1,2,3,...71} leads to an average too big, even if you remove the largest number (71). The set 1 , 2 , 3 , . . . , 68 {1,2,3,...,68} leads to an average too small, even if you remove the smallest possible number number (1).

Thus the largest digit is either n = 69 n=69 or n = 70 n=70

Taking the same equation as line 2 of Alan's solution, make the RHS ( n 1 ) ( 602 ) 17 \frac{(n-1)(602)}{17}

For an integer solution, 17 must divide ( n 1 ) \left(n-1\right) . Thus n = 69 n=69 , giving n 1 = 68 n-1=68 Then solve for k k as Alan's equation.

Hi. Could you please tell why the maximum number of elements in the set are 70? Thanks.

Mehul Arora - 5 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Consider the set of numbers 1 , 2 , 3 , . . . , 71 1,2,3,...,71 . Remove one element and calculate the average of the rest of the set. No matter which number you remove, the average will be at least 35.5. But 602 17 35.4 \frac{602}{17} \approx 35.4 , so the set cannot contain 71, or any numbers above 71.

A similar reasoning can be made to show why stopping the set at 68, i.e. 1 , 2 , 3 , . . . , 68 1,2,3,...,68 does not allow the average to be large enough.

Kevin Nolan - 5 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Oh, I got it. Thanks! :D

Mehul Arora - 5 years, 9 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...