A uniform rod of mass 1 kg and length 1 m is hinged at one end to a flat surface. The rod leans against the upper left corner of a 1 kg rectangular block. The block is 3 1 m tall, as measured from the flat surface upwards. There is no friction anywhere.
Initially, both the rod and the block are at rest, and the left side of the block is a distance of 3 1 m from the hinge.
There is an ambient downward gravitational field of g = 1 0 m/s 2 .
At the instant at which the free end of the rod touches the upper left corner of the block, what percentage of the rod-block system's total kinetic energy is associated with the block's movement?
Details and Assumptions:
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Can you explain how you determined the kinetic energy of block and the rod as the function of X and (Theta) respectively.
Log in to reply
This is standard. The KE of the block is 2 1 m x ˙ 2 for an object moving in a straight line with speed x ˙ and mass m , with no rotational motion involved. The KE of the hinged rod is 2 1 I θ ˙ 2 where I is the moment of inertia of the rod about the axis.
I found inertia 1/2 mistakenly ,it leads to the answer 94.737 percent but it says I am correct even though it have much different..
Log in to reply
The Brilliant system seems hugely forgiving of errors in decimal answers. That is why I tend to prefer to ask for integer answers....
At any instant , the relative velocity of block and rod along the normal from point of contact must be zero or else they will loose contact. Thus using this fact, we get a different relationship between velocity of block and angular velocity of rod. Where am I wrong??
@Spandan Senapati @Mark Hennings @Steven Chase
Log in to reply
The condition tan θ = 3 x 1 is the condition of continued contact between the rod and the block. My relationship between x ˙ and θ ˙ is just the derivative of that. What is your formula, and how did you calculate it?
Log in to reply
Sorry, mine approach is same as yours, I understood.
Nice solution!
No ,its correct both ways will,yield the same result infact.Let at any instant the angle with horizontal= θ .Then ω l = v s i n θ , l s i n θ = h ,So ω = v s i n 2 θ / h Or by derivatives,horizontal distance ( x = h c o t θ ), d x / d t = h c o s e c 2 θ ω ,both are same .Although I prefer second approach in most questions.
Log in to reply
Hmm I might have made some calculation mistakes coz I got answer as 98.6... , Yeah well both approaches are equivalent, so Thanks!
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
The moment of inertia of the rod about the hinge is 3 1 × 1 × 1 2 = 3 1 , and so the KE of the rod is 6 1 θ ˙ 2 , where θ is the angle between the rod and the horizontal. If x is the distance from the left-hand edge of the block to the hinge, then the KE of the block is 2 1 × 1 × x ˙ 2 = 2 1 x ˙ 2 . Conservation of energy tells us that 6 1 θ ˙ 2 + 2 1 x ˙ 2 + 2 1 g sin θ = 2 2 g At any time, the proportion of KE that is associated with the block is R = 6 1 θ ˙ 2 + 2 1 x ˙ 2 2 1 x ˙ 2 = θ ˙ 2 + 3 x ˙ 2 3 x ˙ 2 But tan θ = 3 x 1 , and so sec 2 θ θ ˙ = − 3 x 2 1 x ˙ , so that R = 2 7 x 4 + cos 4 θ 2 7 x 4 At the moment we are interested, x = cos θ = 3 2 2 , and so R = 2 8 2 7 , this makes the answer 9 6 . 4 2 8 5 7 1 4 2 3 . . . .
Conservation of energy is not needed to solve this problem. However, conservation of energy, together with the relationship between x ˙ and θ ˙ , could be used to determine a differential equation for x , and hence establish the full dynamics of the problem.