1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 + . . . = ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Easy to understand. Thank you.
can someone please explain me how we get from the second last step to the last step?
Why did we neglect -3?
Log in to reply
Because all numbers are positive you can never add up two numbers which are positive to get the result of a negative number so becuz of that -3 is neglected 😀😆
1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 + . . . . . .
or 1 2 + x = x
or, 1 2 + x = x 2
or, x 2 − x − 1 2 = 0
or, ( x + 3 ) ( x − 4 ) = 0
or, x = 4
We do not take the negative root of the equation because the terms of the expression are all positive and hence their sum can never be a negative value.
Nice, but you could've split the middle term of the quadratic eqn. as x^2-x-12=0 => x^2-(4-3)x-12=0 => x^2-4x+3x-12=0 =>x(x-4)+3(x-4)=0 => (x-4)(x+3)=0
Let S be 1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 … , so: S 2 = ( 1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 … ) 2 S 2 = 1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 …
⟹ S 2 = 1 2 + S
⟹ S 2 − S − 1 2 = 0
⟹ ( S − 4 ) ( S + 3 ) = 0
⟹ S = 4 or S = − 3
We take the positive value 'cause the terms are positive, then their sum is positive
1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 . . . . . = x
( 1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 . . . . ) 2 = x 2
( 1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 = x 2
( 1 2 + x ) = x 2
0 = x 2 - x - 1 2
0 = ( x − 4 ) ( x + 3 )
Therefore x = 4
1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 + . . . = 1 2 + x = x
x 2 − x − 1 2 = 0 , x 1 , 2 = 2 1 ± 1 + 4 8 , x 1 = 4 , x 2 = − 3 , ⇒ x = 4 ,
because x > 0
I agree, but I would also like to discuss the weirdness of summing positive values to make non-positive sums. Have you heard about the -1/12 thing?
I took a more intuitive approach, which is probably not recommended, but works here. I'm assigning a chain of variables at random, to make the discussion more straightforward.
Starting under the lowest nested radical, we can set
z = 1 2
take the square root of both sides
z = 1 2
the square root of 12 is between the square roots of 9 and 16,
Thus, 3 < z < 4 ;
add 12 to z , and call it y
y = 1 2 + z
y is greater than 15, but less than 16, so . . .
3 < y < 4
Which is the same inequality as \sqrt{z}\
It's a quick assessment to realize that even if you take it all the way to a = 1 2 + b . . . , you'll never reach or exceed 4, so the limit of the function is 4.
suppose, x = 1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 + . . . . .
then, x = 1 2 + x
or, x 2 = 1 2 + x
doing middle term we get, x = 4 , − 3
but square root of positive number can not be negative.
so, x = 4
1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 . . . = S 1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 . . . = S + 1 2 1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 . . . = S + 1 2 So:
S + 1 2 = S
S + 1 2 = S 2
S 2 − S − 1 2 = 0
( S + 3 ) ( S − 4 ) = 0
S = 4
Like Anik Mandal said, we do not take the negative root of the equation because the terms of the expression are all positive and hence their sum can never be a negative value.
1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 + … 1 2 + x 2 + x x 2 − x − 1 2 ( x − 4 ) ( x + 3 ) x 1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 + … = l e t = = = = = = x x x 2 0 0 4 ( x > 0 ) 4
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
a = 1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 + . . .
a 2 = 1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 + . . .
a 2 = 1 2 + a
a 2 − a − 1 2 = 0
( a − 4 ) ( a + 3 ) = 0
The negative solution will be disregarded since the expression was originally positive.
a = 4