Rotating sheet

Consider a rectangular sheet of metal with width W = 2 m W=2~\mbox{m} and length L = 5 m L=5~\mbox{m} . The sheet is in the x-y plane, with the origin right in the geometric middle of the sheet. The x-axis is parallel to the short edge, while the y-axis is parallel to the long edge. The moment of inertia about the z-axis is I z = 10 kg m 2 I_z=10~\mbox{kg}\cdot\mbox{m}^2 and the moment of inertia about an axis that passes diagonally through the sheet (i.e. corner to corner) in the xy plane is I = 5 kg m 2 I=5~\mbox{kg}\cdot\mbox{m}^2 . What is the moment of inertia about the y-axis in kg m 2 \mbox{kg}\cdot\mbox{m}^2 ?


The answer is 5.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Tran Dinh Duy Vu
May 20, 2014

I z = ( x 2 + y 2 ) d m = x 2 d m + y 2 d m = I y + I x = 10 I_{z}=\int{(x^{2}+y^{2})dm}=\int{x^{2}dm}+\int{y^{2}dm}=I_{y} +I_{x}=10 (1)

for the moment of inertia with respect to the diagonal line.

The axis satisfies the equation y 5 + x 2 = 0 \frac{y}{5} +\frac{x}{2} =0 thus the distance from a point (x,y) to the axis is r = y 5 + x 2 s q r t ( 1 / 5 ) 2 + ( 1 / 2 ) 2 r= \frac{ |\frac{y}{5} + \frac{x}{2}|}{sqrt{(1/5)^{2}+(1/2)^{2}}} .

I = r 2 d m = d m ( y 5 + x 2 ) 2 100 29 I=\int{r^{2}dm}=\int{dm(\frac{y}{5} +\frac{x}{2})^{2}\frac{100}{29}}

= 100 29 ( y 2 d m / 25 + x 2 d m / 4 + x y d m / 5 ) = 100 29 ( I x / 25 + I y / 4 ) =\frac{100}{29}(\int{y^{2}dm/25}+\int{x^{2}dm/4}+\int{xydm/5}) =\frac{100}{29}(I_{x}/25+I_{y}/4)

( x y d m / 5 = 0 \int{xydm/5}=0 because of symmetry).

So I x / 25 + I y / 4 = 29 20 I_{x}/25+I_{y}/4=\frac{29}{20} (2).

Solve (1) and (2) we obtain I y = 5 I_{y}=5 .

Can you please explain why integral xy(dm) is zero. The mass distribution is non-uniform.

Vibhav Aggarwal - 3 years, 5 months ago
David Mattingly Staff
May 13, 2014

Choose another 3D coordinate Ox'y'z with Oy' is one of the diagonal lines of the rectangle sheet, and the Oxy plane is the same with Ox'y' plane. Using the theorem of perpendicular axes, we get I z = I o = I x + I y = I x + I I x = I o I = 5 kg m 2 = I I_z=I_o=I_{x'}+I_{y'}=I_{x'}+I \Rightarrow I_{x'}=I_o-I=5~\mbox{kg}\cdot\mbox{m}^2=I .

In detail: the distance between a point i i in the sheet and the Oz axis is r i = x i 2 + y i 2 r_i=\sqrt{{{x'}_i}^2+{{y'}_i}^2} , and the equation for the inertial angular momentum is:

I z = m i r i 2 = m i x i 2 + m i y i 2 = I y + I x I_z=\sum m_i r_i^2=\sum m_i {{x'}_i}^2 + \sum m_i {{y'}_i}^2=I_{y'} + I_{x'}

OK, good. We get m i x i 2 = m i y i 2 = I y = I x = I \sum m_i {{x'}_i}^2 =\sum m_i {{y'}_i}^2=I_{y'}=I_{x'}=I

Now let's consider an axis in Ox'y' that passes through O and make an angle c c with Ox' axis; the equation for the inertial momentum of that axis I I' is:

I = m i r i 2 = m i x i cos ( c ) + y i sin ( c ) 2 I'=\sum m_i {r'}_i^2=\sum m_i {{x'}_i \cos(c) + {y'}_i \sin(c)}^2

I = cos 2 ( c ) m i x i 2 + sin 2 ( c ) m i y i 2 + 2 sin ( c ) cos ( c ) m i x i y i \Rightarrow I'=\cos^2(c) \sum m_i {{x'}_i}^2 + \sin^2(c) \sum m_i {{y'}_i}^2+2\sin(c)\cos(c) \sum m_i {{x'}_i}{{y'}_i}

I = I + 2 sin ( c ) cos ( c ) m i x i y i \Rightarrow I'=I+2\sin(c)\cos(c) \sum m_i {{x'}_i}{{y'}_i}

So if there is one more axis (that also passes through O and in the Õ'y' plane) with the same inertial angular momentum I I , it means m i x i y i = 0 \sum m_i {{x'}_i}{{y'}_i}=0 and all axis in Õ'y' plane that passes through O have the same inertial angular momentum I I .

It means the inertial angular momentum along Oy is just equal to I = 5 kg m 2 I=5~\mbox{kg}\cdot\mbox{m}^2 .

I thought that the moment of inertia about x-axis is 1/12ML^2 , and for y-axis it is 1/12MW^2 . So, by applying the perpendicular axis theorem, we get that the sum of the above two M.O.I should equal to the M.O.I about the z-axis. But, then I get a different answer. Can you please explain where I did wrong?

Mahathir Ahmad - 6 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

I don't think we should assume uniform mass distribution.

Pranav Rao - 5 years, 7 months ago

Yes we can't assume uniform mass distribution I did the same mistake

Rajesh Bunsha - 1 year, 6 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...