Since the Han dynasty (206 BC - 220 AD), the ancient Chinese have been erecting mining derricks to extract salt and other minerals from deep underground. Resting in the middle of these derricks is a 1.8 m cylindrical drum with a diameter measuring 0.6 m . Bamboo cables were used to lower the drill bits. The diameter of the bamboo cable is 1 cm . If the cylindrical drum is tightly wound by this strong cable five times, how long is the bamboo cable around the cylindrical drum to the nearest metre?
NOTE: Treat the layers of the cable to be exactly on top of each other.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
The original cylinder is 1.8m long and has a diameter of 0.6m. Each wire is 0.01m. Hence we need to find the number of windings per layer is ( 1 . 8 / 0 . 0 1 ) = 1 8 0 .
Now we find the length for the first five windings using the Pythagoras theorem. When you wind the cable around the cylinder, the total length is equal to:
( c y l i n d e r l e n g t h ) 2 + ( w i n d i n g s ∗ c i r c u m f e r e n c e c r o s s − s e c t i o n ) 2 )
For the winding circumference, we have to add 2 r , which will include the thickness of the cable. We begin with 0.61 m because we need to add the radii of the first cable on both sides and the diameter of the cylinder to obtain the circumference of the first cross-section.
L 1 = 1 . 8 2 + ( 1 8 0 π ( 0 . 6 1 + 0 . 0 0 ) ) 2 L 2 = 1 . 8 2 + ( 1 8 0 π ( 0 . 6 1 + 0 . 0 2 ) ) 2 L 3 = 1 . 8 2 + ( 1 8 0 π ( 0 . 6 1 + 0 . 0 4 ) ) 2 L 4 = 1 . 8 2 + ( 1 8 0 π ( 0 . 6 1 + 0 . 0 6 ) ) 2 L 5 = 1 . 8 2 + ( 1 8 0 π ( 0 . 6 1 + 0 . 0 8 ) ) 2
The reason why we add 0.02m each time to the original diameter of the cylinder is because the cable increases one layer diametrically when wrapped around the circular cross-section (just draw circles).
We get 1837.853m or about 1838m.
You are assuming that the 2nd layer of cables rests exactly on the top of the first layer of cables. More realistically the 2nd layer would fit into the grooves formed by the first layer and so would the succeeding layers. Therefore each diameter does not increase by 2 cm but 1.7321 cm and the 2nd layer would not consist of 180 spirals but in the neighborhood of 178 and so would the 4th layer. Only the odd numbered layers would contain 180 spirals, Therefore I submit that the correct answer would be less that that suggested.
Log in to reply
So should it be added:
DETAILS AND ASSUMPTIONS:
Layers of cables rest exactly on top of each other.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Here's a quickie way to work this out. Let's pretend that the cable has a 1 c m square cross section. The length of the drum is 1 8 0 c m . The radius of the drum, with and without the cabling, is 3 5 c m and 3 0 c m . The total volume of the cabling material is
1 8 0 π ( 3 5 2 − 3 0 2 ) ≃ 1 8 3 7 8 3 c m
From this, we have 1 8 3 8 m of cabling.