Scary powers of 2

Is 2 2 k 1 2 k 1 1 2^{2^k-1}-2^{k-1}-1 composite for all k > 2 k > 2 ?

Yes No

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Patrick Corn
Jan 16, 2018

Let k = 2 a b k = 2^a b where a 0 a \ge 0 and b b is odd. I claim that 2 2 k 1 2 k 1 1 2^{2^k-1} - 2^{k-1} - 1 is divisible by N a = 2 2 a + 1 = 2 k / b + 1. N_a = 2^{2^a}+1 = 2^{k/b} + 1.

Let's look mod N a . N_a. First, note that 2 k 1 ( 2 k / b ) b 2 1 ( 1 ) b 2 1 2 1 1 / 2. 2^{k-1} \equiv \left( 2^{k/b} \right)^b 2^{-1} \equiv (-1)^b 2^{-1} \equiv -2^{-1} \equiv -1/2. Then look at the first term: 2 2 k 1 ( 2 2 a ) 2 k a 2 1 ( 1 ) 2 k a 2 1 1 / 2. 2^{2^k-1} \equiv \left( 2^{2^a} \right)^{2^{k-a}} 2^{-1} \equiv (-1)^{2^{k-a}} 2^{-1} \equiv 1/2. So the original number is congruent to 1 / 2 ( 1 / 2 ) 1 0 1/2 -(-1/2) - 1 \equiv 0 mod N a . N_a.

I'll leave to the reader the proof that N a N_a is strictly smaller than 2 2 k 1 2 k 1 1 2^{2^k-1}-2^{k-1}-1 for k > 2. k > 2. This shows that 2 2 k 1 2 k 1 1 2^{2^k-1}-2^{k-1}-1 is composite.

. .
Mar 15, 2021

2 2 3 1 2 2 1 = 128 4 1 = 123 = 3 × 61 { 2 ^ { 2 } } ^ { 3 } -1 - 2 ^ { 2 } - 1 = 128 - 4 - 1 = 123 = 3 \times 61 .

So it is always composite , so the answer is Yes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! \boxed { \text { Yes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! } }

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...