My class wants to know my Maths teacher's age, but she doesn't want to reveal it...
So, she wrote this on the board, thinking we would be too lazy to solve it:
k → ∞ lim n = 0 ∑ k ( 3 9 6 5 3 9 6 6 ) − ( n + lo g 3 9 6 5 3 9 6 6 ( 2 ) ) ,
and says the value of this is the year she was born.
Assuming that now is the year 2014 and her birthday has passed, what is her age now? (In years) . . By the way, you don't need to fetch a calculator for this. Save your effort :D
Try my Other Problems
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
good problem sir!!!! really worth the time and effort to solve it, it combines three fields of math in a single problem: log math, infinite series and substitution
I may just be stupid but i dont get your first step
Log in to reply
@William Asai Sorry for the late reply.
x − ( n + lo g x ( 2 ) ) = x n + lo g x ( 2 ) 1 = x lo g x ( 2 ) × x n 1 = 2 ( x n ) 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 |
|
Python will do the job!:)
Good! Btw, now its the year 2 0 1 5 and my new teacher is much older than 3 1 :D
Assume the given summand as y and let x = 3966/3965.
Thus, x^{-(n + log2(base x))} = y. Take log on both sides and solve. You get y = 0.5x^-n.
Now, the whole thing turns out to be an infinite GP (geometric progression) with common ratio 1/x. Whence, we get the result as x/2(x-1).
Substitute to get the result as 1983.
Hence age = 31 yrs
you can simply transform this sum into a integral, because every Riemann's sum with infinite terms can be written as a integral, like this: lim k → ∞ ∫ 0 k 3 9 6 5 3 9 6 6 − ( n + lo g 3 9 6 5 3 9 6 6 2 ) d n .
then:
∫ 0 ∞ 3 9 6 5 3 9 6 6 − ( n + lo g 3 9 6 5 3 9 6 6 2 ) d n = 1 9 8 2 . 7
So, 2 0 1 4 − 1 9 8 2 . 7 = 3 1 . 3
This is fairly accurate due to the fact that the function f ( x ) = 2 × 3 9 6 5 3 9 6 6 x 1 has a very small gradient from x = 0 to x = ∞ . However, it is still not pinpoint-accurate ( 0 . 3 off the actual answer). Any ways to make it more accurate?
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
This is actually a very simple problem in disguise. It can be rewritten as: n = 0 ∑ ∞ 2 ( 3 9 6 5 3 9 6 6 ) n 1 This makes the problem a whole lot easier. Let ( S ) be the year she was born, and ( x ) be ( 3 9 6 5 3 9 6 6 ) . s = n = 0 ∑ ∞ 2 ( x ) n 1 = 2 1 + 2 x 1 + 2 x 2 1 . . . x s = 2 x 1 + 2 x 2 1 + 2 x 3 1 . . . s − x s = s ( 1 − x 1 ) = 2 1 s = ( 1 − x 1 ) ( 2 1 ) = 2 ( 1 − x 1 ) 1 Substitute x = ( 3 9 6 5 3 9 6 6 ) : s = 2 ( 1 − 3 9 6 6 3 9 6 5 ) 1 = 2 3 9 6 6 = 1 9 8 3 Since it is the year 2 0 1 4 , her age is 2 0 1 4 − 1 9 8 3 = 3 1
By the way, in case my Maths teacher decides to get a brilliant account and sees this and tries to kill me, 3 1 isn't her real age.