Δ = ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ m y + n z k z − m x n x + k y m q + n r k r − m p n p + k q m b + n c k c − m a n a + k b ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ = ?
Assume that f is a non-constant function in each of the variables.
Bonus : How can we get those addition terms in determinant.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Can you explain what you are doing here? I believe there are several typos, which make your solution harder to understand.
Just a small addition required that the determinant of a skew symmetric matrix is zero.
Log in to reply
Nope, not always true. We need the condition that n is odd.
Why can't we define f ( x , y , z ) = 0 the constant function?
First, I have splitted the given matrix in product of two matrices and determinant of second matrix is zero. Hence, answer is zero.
Log in to reply
The various issues that I see are:
Multiplying your matrices out, the first row is − m y − n z , m x + k z , n x + k y . This does not resemble your first row in any way.
Your second matrix is not a skew symmetric matrix.
You should explain that "Since we have a skew symmetric matrix of odd order, it's determinant is 0".
Relevant wiki: Determinants
Intuition : we can notice much symmetry if we multiply the third line by m and the first line by k and the second line by n , we can then proceed to sum the second line with the third line to get two same lines, thus, giving us the cancellation of the determinant.
Key points of the proof :
We will suppose all variables are in some K domain which is a field where determinants exist.
An approach :
By (1) :
( m k n ) Δ = ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ m k y + n k z n k z − m n x m n x + m k y m k q + n k r n k r − m n p m n p + m k q m k b + k n c n k c − m n a m n a + m k b ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ (notice how we get chunks of terms everywhere) = ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ m k y + n k z n k z − m n x m k y + n k z m k q + n k r n k r − m n p m k q + n k r m k b + k n c n k c − m n a m k b + n k c ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ (we sum line 2 and line 3 and replace it by line 3 by property (2)) = 0 (by property (3))
Then, by (4) , either m = 0 , either k = 0 , either n = 0 , either Δ = 0 .
Here we do some casework :
If m , n , k are not zero, then Δ = 0 .
If m = 0 , then Δ = ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ n z k z n x + k y n r k r n p + k q n c k c n a + k b ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ = 0 because of (3) and (1), we can factor out k and n and first line and second line are the same.
If k = 0 , then Δ = ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ m y + n z − m x n x m q + n r − m p n p m b + n c − m a n a ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ = 0 , same for m = 0 by factoring − m and n .
Easily, we deduce the same for n = 0 for the same reasons. Left as an exercise to the reader.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Δ = ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ x p a y q b z r c ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ × ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ 0 − m − n m 0 k n k 0 ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ = 0