An integer is said to be two-separable if it can be represented as the product of two positive integers that differ by two. (For example, since 8 = 2 ⋅ 4 , 8 is two-separable.) Similarly, an integer is said to be nine-separable if it can be represented as the product of two positive integers that differ by 9 . What is the sum of all positive integers that are both two-separable and nine-separable?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
can u please explain how we got 77 =(2(b-a) +7).......+ 11)
Nice. This question could be more interesting if there were multiple possible solutions, for when 2 or 9 are replaced with something else. Care to create an extension of this problem?
Log in to reply
I guess in general we're solving ( 2 x + a ) 2 − ( 2 y + b ) 2 = a 2 − b 2 , so it depends on the factorization of a 2 − b 2 .
I created an extension of this problem. Check out my problem and solution: separable integers reloaded
It would have been easier to use a + 1 and a − 1 for denoting two-separable..
What if I say: n = a(a + 2)(a +9), a ≥ 1 It makes "n" a two-separable, seven-separable and nine-separable number but the problem doesn't say anything about the number to be only two-separable and nine-separable and not separable with respect to another natural number. That being said, my answer is that there are infinitely many numbers that are both two-separable and nine-separable. My suggestion is that the problem should say that the numbers have to be both two-separable and nine-separable and not separable with respect to another natural number.
Log in to reply
The problem does specify that a two-separable integer is one that is equal to the product of two integers that differ by two. The a + 9 multiplicand breaks this condition.
Suppose n is an integer which is both two-separable and nine-separable then n = a ( a + 2 ) = b ( b + 9 ) where a and b are positive integers.
If b ≥ a then b ( b + 2 ) ≥ b ( b + 9 ) , therefore b < a . So let a = b + c where c is a positive integer.
After substituting we get ( b + c ) ( b + c + 2 ) = b ( b + 9 ) , which we can rewrite as b = 2 c − 7 − c 2 − 2 c .
A simple inspection reveals that for c ≥ 4 we'll get a negative value for b and values for c of 1, 2, and 3 evaluate to 5 3 , 3 8 , and 1 5 respectively. As b must be a positive integer 1 5 is it's only valid value. n = 1 5 ( 1 5 + 9 ) = 3 6 0 . Since 3 6 0 is the only integer that is both two-separable and nine-separable, 3 6 0 is also the sum of all positive integers that are both two-separable and nine-separable.
Nice solution
Let the number be a. Now a = x ( x + 2 ) where x is an positive integer and a is also equal to a = y ( y + 9 ) where y is a positive integer. As a should be two-separable and nine-separable this gives us the equation
x ( x + 2 ) = y ( y + 9 ) ⟹ x 2 − y 2 + 2 x − 9 y = 0
which is equivalent to the equation of a hyperbola. Solve the equation for positive x and y. Friends you can also take help of wolfram alpha to calculate these integer roots. The link is given below. :)
http://www.wolframalpha.com/examples/CoordinateGeometry.html
Let n = ( k 1 − 1 ) ( k 1 + 1 ) = k 2 ( k 2 − 9 ) for positive integers k 1 and k 2 with k 1 ≥ 2 , k 2 ≥ 1 0 .
Therefore, k 1 2 = k 2 2 − 9 k 2 + 1 <=> k 2 2 − 9 k 2 + ( 1 − k 1 2 ) = 0 .
It implies that k 2 = 2 9 + 4 k 1 2 + 7 7 .
Therefore, 4 k 1 2 + 7 7 = k 2 for a positive integer k . Therefore, k 2 − 4 k 1 2 = ( k − 2 k 1 ) ( k + 2 k 1 ) = 7 7 . It is easy to get that the only k 1 ≥ 2 satisfying the above condition is k 1 = 1 9 .
Therefore, n = 1 9 2 − 1 = 3 6 0 .
I created an extension of this problem. Check out my problem and solution: separable integers reloaded
let x be the number which satisfies both two separable and nine seperable
x=a(a+2)=b(b+9)
a2+2a-x=0;
a=-2+-sqrt 4+4x
b2+9b-x=0;
b=-9+-sqrt 81+4x;
remember a ,b, x are positive integers(a>0 b>0 x>0)
a=-2+sqrt 4+4x and b=-9+sqrt 81+4x
it means 4+4x and 81 +4x should be perfect squares simultaneously
assume a+2 =p and b+9 =q
q2 - p2 = 77
q+p=77 and q-p =1
solutions are q=39 and p=38
similarly q+p=11 and q-p=7
solutions are q=9 and p=2
therefore 77 can be expressed in two possible ways difference of perfect squares
81+4x=1521(square of 39)
x=360;
81+4x=81
x=0;(not possible)
therefore [360] is the only number which can be written in two seperable and nine seperable
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Let n = a ( a + 2 ) = b ( b + 9 ) be a number that is both two-separable and nine-separable. Since a ( a + 2 ) = b ( b + 9 ) , we can rewrite this as
7 7 = ( 2 ( b − a ) + 7 ) ( 2 ( b + a ) + 1 1 )
Since the second term is nonnegative, the first term must be nonnegative. Furthermore, 2 ( b − a ) + 7 ≤ 2 ( b + a ) + 1 1 ⟺ a ≥ − 1 , which is true, so 2 ( b − a ) + 7 ≤ 2 ( b + a ) + 1 1 . Therefore, 2 ( b + a ) + 1 1 = 1 1 or 2 ( b + a ) + 1 1 = 7 7 . Since the first case implies b + a = 0 , the second case is the only possible case. It suffices to solve the system of equations
{ 2 ( b + a ) + 1 1 = 7 7 2 ( b − a ) + 7 = 1
whose solution is ( a , b ) = ( 1 8 , 1 5 ) . Therefore, the only integer that is both two-separable and nine-separable is n = 1 8 ( 1 8 + 2 ) = 1 5 ( 1 5 + 9 ) = 3 6 0 .