Fill in the blank:
N has precisely 10 positive divisors.
2 N has precisely 15 positive divisors.
3 N has precisely 20 positive divisors.
4 N has precisely ________ positive divisors.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
The third statement does add a little bit of information about N. It tells us that q =/= 3, which would be possible based on just the first two statements. But as you say, that doesn't affect the number of divisors of 4N.
Good question, great solution.
It's simple number theory that whenever you double a positive value, that amount of positive divisors it has increases by a constant rate.
N has precisely 10 positive divisors.
2 N has precisely 10 + 5 positive divisors.
4 N has precisely 15 + 5 positive divisors.
Good observation! Can you explain why it is true?
Log in to reply
I didn't know there can be an explaination for an observation
Log in to reply
Hint: Write out the number of divisors.
As mentioned by Richard, this statement is true for "successively multiplied by any prime"
The same kind of statement also holds when N is successively multiplied by powers of any prime, that the number of divisors increased at a constant rate.
For completeness, you still need to show that there exists an integer that satisfy all these conditions...
You don't need to list out the divisors: it suffices that the 15 divisors of of 2N will be divisors of 4N; plus the 5 divisors of 2N but not N will be doubled, and will be new divisors of 4N that weren't divisors of 2N.
Nor do you have to show that such an integer exists: The problem states that N exists, therefore 4N exists.
Log in to reply
If I replace the number 20 (in the problem statement) with another number, say 9999, does that mean that N still exists?
Fact : With the prime factor decomposition N = p 1 e 1 ⋅ p 2 e 2 ⋯ , the number of divisors is δ ( N ) = ( e 1 + 1 ) ( e 2 + 1 ) ( ⋯ ) .
Now δ ( N ) = 1 0 factors as either ( 9 + 1 ) or ( 4 + 1 ) ( 1 + 1 ) , producing two cases.
Case 1 : N = p 9 . If q = p is a prime number, then δ ( p N ) = δ ( p 1 0 ) = ( 1 0 + 1 ) = 1 1 ; δ ( q N ) = δ ( p 9 ⋅ q 1 ) = ( 9 + 1 ) ( 1 + 1 ) = 2 0 . Thus δ ( 3 N ) = 2 0 would be possible if p = 3 , N = 3 9 ; however, then δ ( 2 N ) = 1 1 not 15. This rules out case 1.
Case 2 : N = p 1 4 ⋅ p 2 . If q = p 1 , p 2 is prime, then δ ( p 1 N ) = δ ( p 1 5 p 2 ) = ( 5 + 1 ) ( 1 + 1 ) = 1 2 ; δ ( p 2 N ) = δ ( p 1 4 p 2 2 ) = ( 4 + 1 ) ( 2 + 1 ) = 1 5 ; δ ( q N ) = δ ( p 1 4 p 2 q ) = ( 4 + 1 ) ( 1 + 1 ) ( 1 + 1 ) = 2 0 . We see that δ ( 2 N ) = 1 5 requires p 2 = 2 , and δ ( 3 N ) = 2 0 it true if moreover p 1 = 3 . But then δ ( 4 N ) = δ ( p 2 2 N ) = δ ( p 1 4 p 2 3 ) = ( 4 + 1 ) ( 3 + 1 ) = 2 0 .
The smallest value of N for which these statements are true is N = 5 4 ⋅ 2 = 1 2 5 0 . The divisors are:
of N = 1 2 5 0 : 1,2,5,10,25,50,125,250,625,1250.
of 2 N = 2 5 0 0 : 1,2,4,5,10,20,25,50,100,125,250,500,625,1250,2500.
of 3 N = 3 7 5 0 : 1,2,3,5,6,10,15,25,30,50,75,125,150,250,375,625,750,1250,1875,3750.
of 4 N = 5 0 0 0 : 1,2,4,5,8,10,20,25,40,50,100,125,200,250,500,625,1000,1250,2500,5000.
Let τ ( m ) denote the number of positive divisors of a natural number m . Suppose a is the highest power of 2 dividing N . Then a + 1 is the highest power of 2 dividing 2 N , so that
1 0 1 5 = τ ( N ) τ ( 2 N ) = a + 1 ( a + 1 ) + 1 , which gives a = 1. So now, a + 2 = 3 is the highest power of 2 dividing 4 N , so 4 N has 1 + 1 3 + 1 ⋅ τ ( N ) = 2 ⋅ 1 0 = 2 0 .
For completeness, we see that the number N = 1 2 5 0 = 2 ⋅ 5 4 satisfies all conditions of the problem.
While you have found the fastest way to get the answer, your solution suggests that we don't have to know that sigma(0) (3N) =20 in the first place. But is that true? In other words, if I replace the number 20 in the question with some other positive integer (say, 100000), would the answer still be equal to 20?
Log in to reply
The solution is valid only as long as there exists at least one natural number that satisfies the given conditions; If k is the highest power of 3 in N , then
τ ( 3 N ) = k + 1 k + 2 1 0 = 1 0 + k + 1 1 0 . So k = 0 , 1 , 4 , 9 (as a fun note, i never noticed that the factors of 10 are all one more than a perfect square!). So \tau(3N) can take the values 2 0 , 1 5 , 1 2 , 1 1 only.
Log in to reply
For completeness, you should show that there exists such an integer N that satisfy all these conditions.
I understood upto the point that 2 3 is the highest power of 2 which divides 4 N . But I do not understand your method for calculating τ ( 4 N ) . Specifically this line
so 4 N has 1 + 1 3 + 1 ⋅ τ ( N ) = 2 ⋅ 1 0 = 2 0 .
Log in to reply
The number of divisors of a number N = 2 a 1 p 2 a 2 . . . p n a n whose prime factors have powers a 1 , a 2 , . . . , a k ) is ( a 1 + 1 ) ( a 2 + 1 ) . . . . ( a n + 1 ) .
Because N and 4 N differ only in the power of 2 contained in them (which are respectively 1 and 3 ), the ratio of the number of divisors of 4 N and N is simply ( 1 + 1 ) ( 3 + 1 ) = 2 , because a 2 + 1 , a 3 + 1 , . . . . . will be the same for both N and 4 N
The number N can be written as a product of prime numbers:N=(2^x)(3^y)(5^z)...etc. Assume the possibility to choose is D=xyz...etc. Actually D is the number of the divisors.
In this problem, the D of N,2N,3N are given, so in the 2N case, x becomes (x+1), in the 3N case, y becomes (y+1), in the 4N case, what's x now? (x+2),brilliant!
The all things after(and including) "z" is a constant number in this problem, so we can assume it's "P", since we don't know it for the present.
D(N)=xyP=10
D(2N)=(x+1)yP=15
D(3N)=x(y+1)P=20
D(4N)=(x+2)yP=?
Believe you can solve it now :D
Yup, it's good that you can convert the given statements into a system of equations in terms of x,y and P. Well done!
N = 2 x ∗ 3 y ∗ k , where k is not divisible by 2 or by 3 . Suppose that k has z number of divisors. Then:
( x + 1 ) ( y + 1 ) z = ( x y + x + y + 1 ) z = 1 0 = A
( x + 2 ) ( y + 1 ) z = ( x y + x + 2 y + 2 ) z = 1 5 = B
( x + 1 ) ( y + 2 ) z = ( x y + 2 x + y + 2 ) z = 2 0 = C
From that
x y + x + y + 1 = z 1 0 = 3 2 ∗ z B = 3 2 ∗ ( x y + x + 2 y + 2 )
Since 3 A = 2 B ,
3 x y + 3 x + 3 y + 3 = 2 x y + 2 x + 4 y + 4
x y + x − y − 1 = 0 = ( x − 1 ) ( y + 1 )
y can't be − 1 , so x = 1 .
Similarly 2 A = C ,
2 x y + 2 x + 2 y + 2 = x y + 2 x + y + 2
x y + y = 0 = y ( x + 1 )
x = 1 , so y has to be 0 .
From these z = 5 .
Then 4 N has
( x + 3 ) ( y + 1 ) z = 4 ∗ 1 ∗ 5 = 2 0
divisors.
Yup, this is how I've done it. It's important to identify whether N is divisible by 2 and/or 3 first.
let N = (p1^n1) (p2^n2) (p3^n3) ... (pi^ni); p are prime numbers, p1<p2<p3<...<pi, n are positive integrals
The number of divisors of N: (n1+1)(n2+1)...(ni+1) = 10
Since n >0, n+1>1, (n1+1)(n2+1)...(ni+1) = 2x5 or 5x2 or 10 => n1=1, n2=4 or n1=4, n2=1 or n1=9
N = p1 (p2^4) or (p1^4) p2 or p1^9
2N = 2 p1 (p2^4) or 2 (p1^4) p2 or 2*(p1^9)
Since 2 is a prime number, 2 = p1 or 2 = p2 or 2=/= p1 or p2
if 2 = p1: 2N = (2^2) (p2^4) or (2^5) p2 or 2^10, Number of divisors: 3x5=15 or 6x2=12 or 11=> N=2*p2^4
if 2 = p2: N= p1 (2^4) or (p1^4) 2 or (p1^9)*2, since p1<p2, 2 is the smallest prime, it is not possible.
if 2 =/= p1 or p2, N = 2 p1 (p2^4) or 2 (p1^4) p2 or 2*(p1^9) => number of divisors: 2x2x5 or 2x5x2 or 2x10, =/= 15
THEREFORE, N = 2*(p2^4)
3N = 2 * 3 * (p2^4)
since 3 is also a prime number, 3 = p2 or 3 =/= p2
if 3 =p2, N = 2 * 3^4, 3N = 2 * 3^5, number of divisors: 2x6=12 =/= 20
so 3 =/= p2, N=2 * (p2^4), 3N=2 * 3 * (p2^4), number of divisor: 2x2x5 = 20
THEREFORE, N = 2 * (p2^4), p2 =/= 3
4N = 4 * 2 * (p2^4) = (2^3) * (p2^4), number of divisors: 4x5 = 20
Good exposition.
Bonus question: Is there a unique solution to the following question?
Fill in the blank:
N has precisely 10 positive divisors.
2 N has precisely 15 positive divisors.
3 N has precisely ________ positive divisors.
4 N has precisely 20 positive divisors.
@Andy Hayes gave a very good general term solution but I did it with making cases like this:
Case 1:
Let Different Divisors of N be : 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 then Divisors of 2N : 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12,14,16,18,20 ( = 15 divisors) Divisors of 4N = 2(2N) : 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12,14,16,18,20,24,28,32,36,40 ( = 20 divisors)
Case 2:
As you can see by question that all divisors cannot be ODD because if this happened, 2N will give 20 divisors and 4N will give 40 divisors
Case 3:
this is what i used - Trying to find Smallest Possible Value of N by looking at question and case 1 we can simply tell that upto 10 divisors none can be divisible by 3 or it won't make 3N with 20 divisors So here is what i came off with N = 1 2 4 5 7 8 10 11 13*14 So 2N = 1,2,4,5,7,8,10,11,13,14,16,20,22,26,28 ( =15 divisors) 3N = 1,2,4,5,7,8,10,11,13,14,3,6,12,15,21,24,30,33,39,42 ( = 20 divisors) 4N = 2(2N) = 1,2,4,5,7,8,10,11,13,14,16,20,22,26,28,32,40,44,52,56 ( = 20 divisors)
Please respond if i had done anything wrong :)
I will first try to determine whether N is divisible by 2 and/or 3.
Let N = 2 a ⋅ 3 b ⋅ i = 3 ∏ n p i r i , where a and b are non-negative integers to be determined, p 3 , p 4 , … , p n are distinct prime numbers larger than 3, and r 3 , r 4 , … , r n are positive integers.
We define σ 0 ( X ) as the total number of positive divisors of positive integer X . Then,
\begin{aligned} 10 &=& \sigma_0(N) = (a + 1)(b+ 1) \prod_{i=3}^n (r_i + 1) \qquad\qquad\qquad \tag 1 \\ 15 &=& \sigma_0(2N) = (a + 2)(b+ 1) \prod_{i=3}^n (r_i + 1) \qquad\qquad\qquad \tag 2 \\ 20 &=& \sigma_0(3N) = (a + 1)(b+ 2) \prod_{i=3}^n (r_i + 1) \qquad\qquad\qquad \tag 3 \\ \end{aligned}
( 2 ) ÷ ( 1 ) : 1 0 1 5 = a + 1 a + 2 ⇔ a = 1 .
( 3 ) ÷ ( 1 ) : 1 0 2 0 = b + 1 b + 2 ⇔ b = 0 .
From ( 1 ) : 1 0 = ( 1 + 1 ) ( 0 + 1 ) i = 3 ∏ n ( r i + 1 ) ⇔ i = 3 ∏ n ( r i + 1 ) = 5 ⇔ n = 3 . Hence, N can be expressed as 2 p 4 , where p is a prime larger than 3.
Our answer is σ 0 ( 4 N ) = σ ( 4 ⋅ 2 p 4 ) = σ ( 2 3 ⋅ p 4 ) = ( 3 + 1 ) ( 4 + 1 ) = 2 0 .
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Recall how to count the number of divisors . Given that N has 10 positive divisors, there are two possibilities for its prime factorization:
Case 1: Case 2: N = p 1 × q 4 N = p 9
where p and q are primes.
Now examine these cases taking into account the second statement.
Case 1 :
Suppose that p = 2 and q = 2 . Then,
2 N = 2 1 × p 1 × q 4 .
This gives 20 divisors, so this cannot be true. Now suppose that q = 2 . Then,
2 N = p 1 × 2 5 .
This gives 12 divisors, so this also cannot be true. Now suppose that p = 2 . Then,
2 N = 2 2 × q 4 .
This gives 15 divisors. Then if case 1 is true, it must be the case that p = 2 .
Case 2 :
Suppose that p = 2 . Then,
2 N = 2 1 × p 9 .
This gives 20 positive divisors, so this cannot be true. Now suppose that p = 2 . Then,
2 N = 2 1 0 .
This gives 11 positive divisors, so this also cannot be true. This means that case 2 is impossible. Now we know that case 1 must be true, and it must be the case that p = 2 :
N = 2 1 × q 4
It is not necessary to examine the third statement. If you do examine it, you will note that there are no conflicts. Regardless of the value of q ,
4 N = 2 3 × q 4 .
This gives 2 0 positive divisors.