Which of the following series converge?
Series A : 1 + 2 1 + 3 1 + 4 1 + 5 1 + …
Series B : 1 − 2 1 + 3 1 − 4 1 + 5 1 − …
Series C : 1 − 1 ! 1 + 2 ! 1 − 3 ! 1 + 4 ! 1 − …
Series D : 2 1 + 3 1 + 5 1 + 7 1 + 1 1 1 + … (Reciprocal of Primes)
Series E : − 2 1 + 3 1 − 5 1 + 7 1 − 1 1 1 + … (Reciprocal of Primes)
Series F : 1 1 + 1 1 + 2 1 + 3 1 + 5 1 + 8 1 + 1 3 1 + … (Reciprocal of Fibonacci numbers)
Series G : 1 − 2 2 1 + 3 2 1 − 4 2 1 + 5 2 1 − …
Series H : 1 1 ( 1 1 − 1 ) + 2 1 ( 2 1 − 1 ) + 3 1 ( 3 1 − 1 ) + …
Series I : n = 0 ∑ ∞ F n ( 3 2 ) n
Series J : 1 − 2 + 3 − 4 + 5 − 6 + …
Note that F n is a Fibonacci number
Please do read the solution after attempting...
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Series A : Divergent because it is a harmonic series and any such series always diveges. More information here
Series B : Convergent. Converges to ln 2 ; it can be shown using Mercator_series
Series C : Convergent. Converges to e 1 ; it can be shown using the Taylor Series of e x
Series D : Divergent; as proved by Leonhard Euler in 1737.
Series E : Convergent. Click here for more information. Click here for the integer sequence of the resulting number.
Series F : Convergent. Converges to Reciprocal Fibonacci constant ( ψ ) . Click here and here for more information.
Series G : Convergent. Converges to 1 2 π 2 . Click here for more information.
Series H : Divergent; beacause it can be rearranged easily to ζ ( 2 ) − Series A and because Series A is divergent, the whole sum becomes divergent.
Series I : Divergent; because the series of type n = 0 ∑ ∞ F n ( x ) n converges only when ∣ x ∣ < φ 1 , and in this case, 3 2 ≈ 0 . 6 6 6 . . . is greater than φ 1 ≈ 0 . 6 1 8 0 3 . For more information, click here .
Series J : Divergent; because its sequence of partial sums, ( 1 , − 1 , 2 , − 2 , . . . ) , does not tend towards any finite limit. A paradoxical result to the sum was computed by Leonhard Euler, that is 1 − 2 + 3 − 4 + 5 − 6 + … = 4 1 but this was later proved wrong. Click here for more information.