Series

Number Theory Level pending

Find the next number in the series.

2, 9, 28, 65, 126.


The answer is 217.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

Kenny Lau
Jul 8, 2014

2 = 2 × ( 1 2 0 ) 9 = 3 × ( 2 2 1 ) 28 = 4 × ( 3 2 2 ) 65 = 5 × ( 4 2 3 ) 126 = 6 × ( 5 2 4 ) \begin{array}{rcl} 2&=&2\times(1^2-0)\\ 9&=&3\times(2^2-1)\\ 28&=&4\times(3^2-2)\\ 65&=&5\times(4^2-3)\\ 126&=&6\times(5^2-4) \end{array}

Therefore the next number is 7 × ( 6 2 5 ) = 7 × 31 = 217 7\times(6^2-5)=7\times31=217 .

As a side note, the word in the question should have been "sequence" instead of "series". Sequence refers to a, well, sequence of numbers and series refers to the sum of the numbers in a sequence.

Kenny Lau - 6 years, 11 months ago
Anh Vu
Jul 12, 2014

Rather an odd approach. Take the difference between any two consecutive elements, we have new series: 7, 19, 37, 61. Again, repeat the same process for this new found series: 12, 18, 24. And repeat again, we then realize that it's 6, 6, so the next element should be 6. Thus, the next element of "12, 18, 24" series should be 30, and it is 91 for "7, 19, 37, 61", and finally the next element of the main series is 126 + 91 = 217. Guess I got it by luck :)

Not necessarily, since a good few great mathematicians studied differences of various kinds.

Bill Bell - 6 years, 10 months ago
Bill Bell
Jul 22, 2014

The second differences form an arithmetic sequence. So these are from a cubic polynomial. Pop them into Wolfram-Alpha. (OK, I'm mentally lazy.) Verify its result with Python, using:

[n**3+1 for n in range(1,7)]

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...