Similar Triangles and Centroids

Geometry Level 3

Triangle A O B AOB and triangle B O C BOC are directly similar (they have the same orientation). Let the centroids of these two triangles be M 1 M_1 and M 2 M_2 , respectively.

If triangle M 1 O M 2 M_1OM_2 is right, and M 1 M 2 = A B M_1M_2=AB , then the sum of all possible values of cos 2 ( A B O ) \cos^2(\angle ABO) can be expressed as p q \dfrac{p}{q} for positive coprime integers p , q p,q .

Find p + q p+q .

Note: We do not know which angle of M 1 O M 2 \triangle M_1 O M_2 is the right angle.


The answer is 49.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Daniel Liu
Dec 23, 2014

Lemma: M 1 O M 2 A O B B O C \triangle M_1OM_2\sim \triangle AOB\sim \triangle BOC

Proof: let the midpoints of A B AB and B C BC be P 1 P_1 and P 2 P_2 , respectively. Note that P 1 O P 2 \triangle P_1OP_2 and M 1 O M 2 \triangle M_1OM_2 are related by a homothety with center O O and scale 3 2 \dfrac{3}{2} , so they are similar. Thus it remains to prove that P 1 O P 2 A O B P_1OP_2\sim AOB .

Note that P 1 O P_1O and P 2 O P_2O are the medians from O O of A O B \triangle AOB and B O C \triangle BOC respectively. Thus P 1 O P 2 O = A O B O \dfrac{P_1O}{P_2O} = \dfrac{AO}{BO} .

Also, note that P 1 O P 2 = P 1 O B + B O P 2 = P 1 O B + A O P 1 = A O B \angle P_1OP_2 = \angle P_1OB + \angle BOP_2 = \angle P_1OB+\angle AOP_1=\angle AOB .

Thus, P 1 O P 2 A O B \triangle P_1OP_2 \sim \triangle AOB and we proved our lemma.


Since M 1 O M 2 \triangle M_1OM_2 is right, then that implies that A O B \triangle AOB and B O C \triangle BOC are also right.

Since M 1 M 2 = A B M_1M_2=AB , it means M 1 O M 2 A O B \triangle M_1OM_2\cong \triangle AOB .

Now there are two cases: A O B = 9 0 \angle AOB=90^{\circ} or O A B = 9 0 \angle OAB = 90^{\circ} , because clearly A B O 9 0 \angle ABO\ne 90^{\circ} .

Case 1: A O B = 9 0 \angle AOB=90^{\circ}

Let M 1 O = A O = x M_1O=AO=x . Note that P 1 O = 3 2 x P_1O=\dfrac{3}{2}x . Since P 1 A = P 1 B = P 1 O P_1A=P_1B=P_1O , then A B = 3 x AB=3x . Finally, by Pythagorean Theorem, B O = 2 x 2 BO = 2x\sqrt{2} .

This gives cos 2 A B O = ( 2 2 3 ) 2 = 8 9 \cos^2 \angle ABO = \left(\dfrac{2\sqrt{2}}{3}\right)^2=\dfrac{8}{9}

Case 2: O A B = 9 0 \angle OAB = 90^{\circ}

Let M 1 O = A O = x M_1O=AO=x . Note that P 1 O = 3 2 x P_1O=\dfrac{3}{2}x . By Pythagorean Theorem, P 1 A = 5 2 x P_1A = \dfrac{\sqrt{5}}{2}x so A B = x 5 AB = x\sqrt{5} . By Pythagorean Theorem, B O = x 6 BO = x\sqrt{6} .

This gives cos 2 A B O = ( 5 6 ) 2 = 5 6 \cos^2 \angle ABO = \left(\dfrac{\sqrt{5}}{\sqrt{6}}\right)^2=\dfrac{5}{6}

Finally, 8 9 + 5 6 = 31 18 \dfrac{8}{9}+\dfrac{5}{6}=\dfrac{31}{18} so our answer is 31 + 18 = 49 31+18=\boxed{49} .

@Calvin Lin Can you please let all the people who answered 23 23 be correct? I accidentally typoed cos \cos and sin \sin .

Daniel Liu - 6 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Calvin Lin tagged above

Daniel Liu - 6 years, 5 months ago

Those who previously entered 23 have been marked correct.

Calvin Lin Staff - 6 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Apparently nobody answered 23 though, so no harm done I guess.

Daniel Liu - 6 years, 5 months ago

For the lemma, it directly follows from this observation:
Let T T be the transformation that rotates about O O by A O B \angle AOB , and scales by O B O A \frac{ OB}{OA} .
All triangles with vertices X , O , T ( X ) X, O, T(X) will have a ratio of sides O B O A \frac{OB}{OA} and a internal angle of A O B \angle AOB , thus they will all be similar.
Since we have T ( A ) = B T(A) = B , T ( B ) = C T(B) = C , T ( M 1 ) = M 2 T ( M_1) = M_2 and T ( O ) = 0 T(O) = 0 , hence the triangles A O B , B O C , M 1 O M 2 AOB, BOC, M_1OM_2 are similar.


This in essence is what you're trying to say. The above is a simpler way to motivate the lemma.

Calvin Lin Staff - 6 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

It could be "explained" even simpler by citing the Mean Geometry Theorem, which gives M 1 O M 2 = 1 3 A O B + 1 3 B O C + 1 3 O O O \triangle M_1OM_2= \dfrac{1}{3}\triangle AOB + \dfrac{1}{3}\triangle BOC + \dfrac{1}{3}\triangle OOO which proves the triangles' similarity.

I might create a Wiki article on it, if I find the time.

Daniel Liu - 6 years, 5 months ago

In triangle M 1 O M 2 M_1 OM_2 , I assumed that the right angle was at vertex M 2 M_2 because that's what the diagram indicated, which it turns out is the one case that can't happen. This seems misleading, and I think you should specifically say in the problem that the right angle can be at any vertex.

Jon Haussmann - 6 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Well, I did add "not to scale" on the diagram... I put the right angle at the vertex that can't be a right angle just so I reveal nothing about the solution. Maybe I should specify further that you should NOT make any assumptions based on the diagram?

Daniel Liu - 6 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Yes, but saying "not to scale" only means you can't assume that the general proportions of the diagram are accurate. But marking a right angle is definitive - you should only do this is there is actually a right angle where you say it is.

Instead of cautioning the reader to not make any assumptions about the diagram, it would be better not to put features in the diagram that don't actually hold.

Jon Haussmann - 6 years, 5 months ago

90 on the diagram is misleading. Can you please correct it ? .Angle M 1 M 2 O M_1M_2O may be drawn as acute angle. In fact since I saw that it can not be a right angle, I gave up.
I was not able to draw a scaled sketch. Can you please supply a scaled sketch?

You mention that M 1 O M 2 A O B { o r i s i t B O A ? } O M 1 = O B . \triangle~M_1OM_2 \cong \triangle AOB~ \{ ~or ~is~it~\cong \triangle BOA~?\} ~\\\therefore~OM_1=OB.
Can you please explain how is this possible ? Thanks.

Niranjan Khanderia - 6 years, 5 months ago

Shouldn't we consider cases where BA/BO=AO/OC or BA=OC?

Makhfirat Arabova - 1 year, 2 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...