∫ 0 ∞ ( e π x + e − π x ) ( 1 6 + x 2 ) d x
If the integral above equals to a π − c b where a , b , c are positive integers and with b , c are coprime, find a + b + c .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Awesome ...solution.... How did you grab these concepts?!
Log in to reply
Some really good lecture pdf's(Joseph Bak's Complex analysis also) along with of course, Wikipedia.
great, r u really 15
Wow! I too did it using complex analysis but I did it a little differently. I will post the solution tomorrow. What's up with all your new integration problems? They all remind me of contour.
Log in to reply
*Just joking! Great problem! Took me quite a time to do.
I also did in the complex way. Isn't there a jee friendly method for it??
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Well, I am thrilled, seriously.
Anyways,
∫ 0 ∞ 2 c o s h ( π x ) ( 1 6 + x 2 ) d x
is our problem and we can write it as -
2 1 ∫ − ∞ ∞ 2 c o s h ( π x ) ( 1 6 + x 2 ) d x
We will do just the integral first and then all we would be left with is that half factor.
We know
∫ C f ( z ) d z = ∫ − a a f ( z ) d z + ∫ a r c f ( z ) d z
∫ C f ( z ) d z − ∫ a r c f ( z ) d z = ∫ − a a f ( z ) d z
where C is the contour described.
Here, we will let C be a semicircle with radius a = ∞ and origin as the center in the positive imaginary axis.
Let's compute ∫ C 2 c o s h ( π z ) ( z + 4 i ) ( z − 4 i ) 1
We will do the residue theorem.
What are the singularities?
z − 4 i = 0 , z = 4 i
z + 4 i = 0 , z = − 4 i , Is this a singularity? No! Because − 4 i is not included in our selected contour.
c o s h ( π z ) = 0 , c o s ( i π z ) = 0
i π z = 2 ( 2 n − 1 ) π , z = 2 ( 2 n − 1 ) i , where n ∈ Z
(Here we have also found the Weierstrass product and hence the infinite product)
So,
∫ C 2 c o s h ( π z ) ( z + 4 i ) ( z − 4 i ) 1 = 2 π i ( R e s ( f ( z ) , 4 i ) + n = 1 ∑ ∞ R e s ( f ( z ) , 2 ( 2 n − 1 ) i ) )
f ( z ) is of the form Q ( z ) P ( z ) such that singularity is a simple pole so the residue is simply Q ′ ( z ) P ( z )
Taking derivative tells us that we have to put our value of singularity in
4 ( 2 ( 2 n − 1 ) i ) c o s h ( 2 ( 2 n − 1 ) π i ) + 2 π ( 1 6 + ( 2 ( 2 n − 1 ) i ) 2 ( s i n h ( 2 ( 2 n − 1 ) i ) ) 1
R e s ( f ( z ) , 4 i ) = 1 6 i 1
n = 1 ∑ ∞ R e s ( f ( z ) , 2 ( 2 n − 1 ) i ) = n = 1 ∑ ∞ 2 π ( 1 6 − ( 2 2 n − 1 ) 2 ) ( − 1 ) n i
which can be resolved into
n = 1 ∑ ∞ 9 − 2 n ( − 1 ) n + 7 + 2 n ( − 1 ) n
which telescopes to 1 0 5 1 5 2
but wait,we have taken out sum constants in that sum resolution i.e. 8 π i (You can see that)
So, our second residue comes out to be 1 0 5 π 1 9 i
Our line integral finally becomes
∫ C 2 c o s h ( π z ) ( z + 4 i ) ( z − 4 i ) 1 = 2 π i ( 1 6 i 1 + 1 0 5 π 1 9 i )
There is one more integral we need to consider
i.e. ∫ a r c 2 c o s h ( π z ) ( z 2 + 1 6 ) 1 ⇒ 0 , a ⇒ ∞ [We will not give this here since the solution is becoming quite long]
∫ − ∞ ∞ 2 c o s h ( π z ) ( z 2 + 1 6 ) 1 = 2 π i ( 1 6 i 1 + 1 0 5 π 1 9 i )
∫ 0 ∞ 2 c o s h ( π z ) ( z 2 + 1 6 ) 1 = 1 6 π − 1 0 5 1 9