S = d ∣ 1 2 0 9 0 ∑ d ϕ ( d )
Find the smallest positive integer a such that a × S is an integer.
Clarifications
The sum S is taken over all 32 positive integer divisors d of 1 2 0 9 0 = 6 × 2 0 1 5
ϕ ( d ) denotes the Euler's totient function .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Yes, very nicely done (+1)!
Very nice problem! My approach was quite different from the posted solutions. For the sake of variety, let me add my solution here too.
We note n : = 1 2 0 9 0 = 2 × 3 × 5 × 1 3 × 3 1 .
S : = d ∣ n ∑ d ϕ ( d ) = d ∣ n ∑ d d ⋅ P ( d ) = d ∣ n ∑ P ( d )
Here, P ( d ) = i ∏ ( 1 − q ( d , i ) 1 ) where the q ( d , i ) 's are the prime factors of d , i.e., we have { q ( d , i ) } ⊆ { 2 , 3 , 5 , 1 3 , 3 1 } = { p i } ∀ d : d ∣ n
Since multiplicity of every prime factor of n is 1 , it makes our work simple. We calculate r i = ( 1 − p i 1 ) for every element of { p i } i ≥ 1 = { 2 , 3 , 5 , 1 3 , 3 1 } .
Note that,
S = d ∣ n ∑ P ( d ) = 1 + k = 1 ∑ 5 1 ≤ i 1 < i 2 < ⋯ < i k ≤ 5 ∑ j = 1 ∏ k r i j
Now, consider the polynomial f ( x ) = ( x − 1 ) i = 1 ∏ 5 ( x − r i ) = x 6 + a 5 x 5 + a 4 x 4 + ⋯ a 1 x + a 0 (say)
By Vieta's formulas and with a bit of inspection, we can conclude that f ( − 1 ) = 1 + k = 0 ∑ 5 ( − 1 ) k a k = 2 S
So, we calculate f ( − 1 ) which is,
2 S = f ( − 1 ) = ( − 1 − 1 ) i = 1 ∏ 5 ( − 1 − r i ) = ( − 1 − 1 ) ( − 1 − 2 1 ) ( − 1 − 3 2 ) ( − 1 − 5 4 ) ( − 1 − 1 3 1 2 ) ( − 1 − 3 1 3 0 ) = 4 0 3 1 3 7 2 5
⟹ S = 8 0 6 1 3 7 2 5
Since g cd ( 1 3 7 2 5 , 8 0 6 ) = 1 , for a S = 8 0 6 1 3 7 2 5 a to be an integer, we need a ≡ 0 ( m o d 8 0 6 ) , i.e., a = 8 0 6 m ∀ m ∈ Z with the smallest positive integer a being 8 0 6 at m = 1 .
Good approach. however it is not clear to me what you chose to define the polynomial, as opposed to making the multiplicative observation directly.
Here is a compressed version of Aareyan's fine solution:
f ( n ) = ∑ d ∣ n d ϕ ( d ) is multiplicative, with f ( p ) = p ϕ ( p ) + 1 ϕ ( 1 ) = p 2 p − 1 for primes p , so that f ( 2 ∗ 3 ∗ 5 ∗ 1 3 ∗ 3 1 ) = f ( 2 ) f ( 3 ) f ( 5 ) f ( 1 3 ) f ( 3 1 ) = 2 ∗ 3 ∗ 5 ∗ 1 3 ∗ 3 1 3 ∗ 5 ∗ 9 ∗ 2 5 ∗ 6 1 = 8 0 6 1 3 7 2 5 .
As an interesting aside, note that f ( n ) = n 1 ∑ k = 1 n g cd ( k , n ) .
yes: f ( n ) = d ∣ n ∑ n d n ϕ ( d ) = n 1 d ∣ n ∑ d n ϕ ( d ) = n 1 d ∣ n ∑ d ϕ ( d n ) the part after n 1 is the formula for the sum of gcd. this is a great prove of that bieng multiplicative as the original sum f was easily proven to be multiplicative. multiplying by n doesnt change multiplicity.
Log in to reply
Yes, exactly! Small typo: The first two " ϕ ( n ) " in your formula for f ( n ) should be " ϕ ( d ) " .
It does follow directly from the definition of a multiplicative function that ∑ k = 1 n g cd ( k , n ) = n ∑ d ∣ n d ϕ ( d ) is multiplicative. It is trivial to verify that products and quotients of multiplicative functions are multiplicative and that the divisor sum F ( n ) = ∑ d ∣ n f ( d ) of a multiplicative function f ( d ) is multiplicative. (A slightly fancier explanation uses the Dirichlet convolution.)
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
it is a multiplicative function. let f ( d ) = d ϕ ( d ) then f(1)=1, and f(ab) for coprime a,b f ( a b ) = a b ϕ ( a b ) = a ϕ ( a ) b ϕ ( b ) = f ( a ) f ( b ) the summation at 1 is one. that is also multiplicative. so d ∣ 2 ∗ 3 ∗ 5 ∗ 1 3 ∗ 3 1 ∑ d ϕ ( d ) = ⎝ ⎛ d ∣ 2 ∑ d ϕ ( d ) ⎠ ⎞ ⎝ ⎛ d ∣ 3 ∑ d ϕ ( d ) ⎠ ⎞ ⎝ ⎛ d ∣ 5 ∑ d ϕ ( d ) ⎠ ⎞ ⎝ ⎛ d ∣ 1 3 ∑ d ϕ ( d ) ⎠ ⎞ ⎝ ⎛ d ∣ 3 1 ∑ d ϕ ( d ) ⎠ ⎞ = ( 1 + 2 1 ) ( 1 + 3 2 ) ( 1 + 5 4 ) ( 1 + 1 3 1 2 ) ( 1 + 3 1 3 0 ) = 8 0 6 1 3 7 2 5