Find the smallest positive prime divisor of
1 6 0 + 2 6 0 + 3 6 0 + ⋯ + 3 3 6 0 .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I like this solution, but I think there is a problem with part of the proof. You say that S n = S if ( p − 1 ) ∤ n , but this is definitely not true. For instance, if p = 5 and n = 2 , S n = { 1 , 4 } . It's true that S n = S if p − 1 and n are relatively prime, but that's not what you need (when p = 1 7 and n = 6 0 ).
Can u pls tell me if I wrong in calculating totient function of 60 and then added 1 to it???Thanks
Why will adding 34^60 not affect the sum??
Since ( p − 1 ) ∣ 6 0 is true for every prime p less than 17, 1 6 0 + ⋯ + 3 3 6 0 ≡ 3 3 − ⌊ p 3 3 ⌋ (mod p )
Now 3 3 ≡ ⌊ p 3 3 ⌋ (mod p ), and this is false for every prime p less than 17.
Prime numbers have a general property:
1 n + 2 n + ⋯ + ( p − 1 ) n ≡ 0 (mod p) iff ( p − 1 ) ∤ n
Since ( 1 7 − 1 ) ∤ 6 0
1 6 0 + 2 6 0 + 3 6 0 + ⋯ + 3 3 6 0 ≡ 2 ( 1 6 0 + 2 6 0 + 3 6 0 + ⋯ + 1 6 6 0 ) ≡ 0 (mod 17)
And therefore 1 7 is our answer.
The second line could be phrased in a clearer manner. What you likely intended to say is that
We can check that for primes p < 1 7 , 3 3 ≡ ⌊ p 3 3 ⌋ ( m o d p ) . Hence, these primes p do not divide our expression.
Well, I think you need to do a little more work to show that nothing smaller than 1 7 divides the sum. Modulo those primes, you get a sum of 1s and 0s, but you do need to count them carefully.
As for your question, it helps a lot to write everything as a power of a primitive root .
Log in to reply
Since ( p − 1 ) ∣ 6 0 is true for every prime p less than 17, 1 6 0 + ⋯ + 3 3 6 0 ≡ 3 3 − ⌊ p 3 3 ⌋ (mod p )
Now 3 3 ≡ ⌊ p 3 3 ⌋ (mod p ), and this is false for every prime p less than 17.
I left this out because I thought it was quite straight forward.
And thanks for the tip!
Good answer
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Let p be a prime. Let's review some facts of arithmetic modulo p .
Let n be an integer and consider the set S = { 1 , 2 , … , p − 1 } modulo p . Define S n = { 1 n , 2 n , … , ( p − 1 ) n } . Then S n = { S { 1 } if ( p − 1 ) ∣ n if ( p − 1 ) ∣ n Both statements follow from Fermat's Little Theorem. We see that taking powers of S shuffles its elements around bijectively, but if the exponent is a multiple of p − 1 , all powers of S become equal to 1.
Next, I claim that 1 + 2 + ⋯ + ( p − 1 ) ≡ 0 mod p for p > 2 . This is easily seen, because the elements can be paired: 1 + ( p − 1 ) = p ≡ 0 , 2 + ( p − 2 ) = p ≡ 0 , and so on. It follows nicely that for p > 2 , Σ n = 1 n + 2 n + ⋯ + ( p − 1 ) n ≡ { 0 − 1 if ( p − 1 ) ∣ n if ( p − 1 ) ∣ n . We can freely add the term p n , because p ≡ 0 anyway.
Next consider the sum T k , n = 1 n + 2 n + ⋯ + k n modulo p . If k = q p + r , then this sum is equal to T k , n = 1 n + 2 n + ⋯ + k n = q Σ n + 1 n + 2 n + ⋯ + r n ≡ { 1 n + ⋯ + r n r − q if ( p − 1 ) ∣ n if ( p − 1 ) ∣ n .
Now we have the tools to solve this problem. We check the primes p = 2 , 3 , 5 , 7 , … in order and calculate the sum T = T 3 3 , 6 0 modulo p . The lowest prime p for which it is zero is the answer.
p = 2 . It is clear that 17 of the terms are odd, so that T ≡ 1 mod 2.
p = 3 . Since ( 3 − 1 ) ∣ 6 0 and 3 3 = 1 1 ⋅ 3 + 0 , T ≡ 0 − 1 1 ≡ 1 mod 3.
p = 5 . We see ( 5 − 1 ) ∣ 6 0 , and 3 3 = 6 ⋅ 5 + 3 , so that T ≡ 3 − 6 ≡ 2 mod 5.
p = 7 . Again ( 7 − 1 ) ∣ 6 0 , and 3 3 = 4 ⋅ 7 + 5 , so that T ≡ 5 − 4 ≡ 1 mod 7.
p = 1 1 . Also ( 1 1 − 1 ) ∣ 6 0 , and 3 3 = 3 ⋅ 1 1 + 0 , so that T ≡ 0 − 3 ≡ 8 mod 11.
p = 1 3 . Once again, ( 1 3 − 1 ) ∣ 6 0 , and 3 3 = 2 ⋅ 1 3 + 7 , so that T ≡ 7 − 2 ≡ 5 mod 13.
p = 1 7 . This time ( 1 7 − 1 ) ∣ 6 0 . We see that adding 3 4 6 0 will not affect the sum modulo 17, and that gives us 3 4 = 2 ⋅ 1 7 + 0 , so that T ≡ 0 mod 17.
Here we can stop, because we have found that 1 7 ∣ T .