x 2 − 2 ( m − 1 ) x + 2 m 2 − 3 m + 1 = 0
In the equation above, m is a parameter. If the equation has two real roots x 1 and x 2 , find the maximum value of ∣ x 1 + x 2 + x 1 x 2 ∣ .
Submit your answer to three decimal places or − 1 if you think that there is no solution.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Hey, it's me. I'm sorry to haunt you like this (of course I don't have any intention to do that). I was becoming anxious that you suddenly dismissed the discusion about that sequence, yet I did not know how to contact you, so it is inevitable for me to write a message to you via this way. Are you finished with that discussion or have you forgotten about it? I would like to know why there has been no replies lately. If you have other priorities then it is absolutely fine to me that this discussion remains adjourned or maybe dismissed. But if it occurs that you somehow have the time and energy to carry on the discussion, this would be great news for me:) I would like you to understand that I have no one that I can ask, since there has been no brilliant members who are willing to give fruitful help (which you have surely given me). I would greatly appreciate your reply. Thx again!
Log in to reply
Hi! No worries - I'll reply back on the discussion thread later today.
Log in to reply
Have you checked yet? Just as a reminder, title of the discussion was ‘four questions about this weird sequence’. And our discussion was about solving it algebraicly.
x 2 − 2 ( m − 1 ) x + 2 m 2 − 3 m + 1 = 0
⇒ Δ = [ − 2 ( m − 1 ) ] 2 − 4 ( 2 m 2 − 3 m + 1 ) = 4 m 2 − 8 m + 4 − ( 8 m 2 − 1 2 m + 4 ) = − 4 m 2 + 4 m = 4 m ( 1 − m )
In order that the equation has 2 distinct real solutions, Δ > 0 ⇔ 4 m ( 1 − m ) > 0
⇔ 0 < m < 1
Using Vieta's formula for Quadratics , we have:
{ x 1 + x 2 = 2 ( m − 1 ) x 1 x 2 = 2 m 2 − 3 m + 1
Substituting these results into A , we have:
A = ∣ ( x 1 + x 2 ) + x 1 x 2 ∣ = ∣ 2 ( m − 1 ) + 2 m 2 − 3 m + 1 ∣ = ∣ 2 m 2 − m − 1 ∣ = ∣ ( m − 1 ) ( 2 m + 1 ) ∣
Using 0 ≤ m ≤ 1 , we can deduce that { m − 1 ≤ 0 2 m + 1 ≥ 0
Therefore, ( m − 1 ) ( 2 m + 1 ) ≤ 0
Hence, A = ∣ ( m − 1 ) ( 2 m + 1 ) ∣ = − ( m − 1 ) ( 2 m + 1 ) = − 2 m 2 + m + 1
⇔ A = − 2 ( m 2 − 2 . m . 4 1 + 1 6 1 ) + 8 1 + 1 = − 2 ( m − 4 1 ) 2 + 8 9 ≤ 8 9
The inequality A ≤ 8 9 occurs only when m − 4 1 = 0 ⇔ m = 4 1 (satisfies the condition 0 < m < 1 , which is necessary for the first equation to have 2 distinct real solutions)
Therefore, the maximum value of A is 8 9
For the equation to have two real roots, the discriminant
( 2 ( m − 1 ) ) 2 − 4 ( 2 m 2 − 3 m + 1 ) 4 m 2 − 8 m + 4 − 8 m 2 + 1 2 m − 4 − 4 m 2 + 4 m ⟹ m ( m − 1 ) > 0 > 0 > 0 < 0
This implies that the equation has two real roots, when 0 < m < 1 . Then we have:
∣ x 1 + x 2 + x 1 x 2 ∣ ⟹ max ∣ x 1 + x 2 + x 1 x 2 ∣ = ∣ 2 ( m − 1 ) + 2 m 2 − 3 m + 1 ∣ = ∣ 2 m 2 − m − 1 ∣ = ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ 2 ( m − 4 1 ) 2 − 8 9 ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ = ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ − 8 9 ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ = 1 . 1 2 5 By Vieta’s formula when m = 4 1
Reference: Vieta's formula
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
By Vieta, we immediately have x 1 + x 2 = 2 ( m − 1 ) and x 1 x 2 = 2 m 2 − 3 m + 1 = ( 2 m − 1 ) ( m − 1 ) ; so A = ∣ ( 2 m + 1 ) ( m − 1 ) ∣
We also need the original equation to have real roots; hence we need ( m − 1 ) 2 > 2 m 2 − 3 m + 1
Expanding and rearranging, this condition is m ( m − 1 ) < 0
ie 0 < m < 1 .
In this range, m − 1 < 0 and 2 m + 1 > 0 so that A = ( 2 m + 1 ) ( 1 − m )
Either by differentiating or completing the square, we find this has a maximum at m = 4 1 (which is in the required range), where A = 8 9 .