Solve it!

Logic Level 3

Find the smallest natural number which has the following properties:

(a) Its decimal representation has 6 as the last digit.

(b) If the last digit 6 is erased and placed in front of the remaining digits, the resulting number is four times as large as the original number.


The answer is 153846.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Alex Zhong
Apr 14, 2015

Let A A be the remaining digits such that

4 ( 10 A + 6 ) = 6 × 1 0 k + A A = 6 × 1 0 k 24 39 , 4(10A + 6) = 6\times 10^k +A \implies A=\dfrac{6\times10^k -24 }{39},

where k k is the total number of digits of n n .

Next we do case works from k = 1 , 2 , 3 , k=1,2,3,\ldots and find that when k = 5 , k=5, A = 15384 A=15384 is an integer. Therefore, n = 153846 . n=\boxed{153846}.

This is my attempt to this question! Please go through this! We know last digit is 6! When we multiply 6 by 4, we get 4 as last digit. So, second last digit should be four. Also first digit should be 1(If the first digit is >1 and when the number is multiplied by 4, we get the first digit not =6). So, we know first, second last digit and last digit, which are - 1,4,6 respectively. Now, when this no is multiplied by 4, second digit is last digit of-(4 4 +2(carry from 6)) which is 8. So, third last digit is 8. We perform this step until we get 1 as last digit(which is first digit of required number). Therefore, fourth number from back is last digit of (8 4 + 1(carry from 8)) which is 3. Now, the no is 1...3846. Similarly, fifth number from back is last digit of (3 4 +3(carry from 8)) which is 5. Now the no is 1...53846. Now, again finding previous no. It is last digit of (5 4+1(carry from 5)) which is 1! WE GOT 1 !!! Therefore, required number is : 153846.

Rishav Agarwal - 6 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Yeah, I had the same method. The solution above was just the mathematical formalization of what we did.

Swapnil Das - 5 years, 6 months ago

This is an excellent solution!!

Aran Pasupathy - 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Thank You!

Rishav Agarwal - 6 years, 1 month ago

I would like to have 153846 dollars. But 6153846 is four times better.

Hasmik Garyaka - 2 years, 6 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...