A pucelana sequence is an increasing sequence of 16 consecutive odd numbers whose sum is a perfect cube. How many pucelana sequences are there with 3-digit numbers only?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
1 . S o l u t i o n
Let x 1 , … , x 1 6 be a pucelana sequence.
Since such a sequence is constructed from consecutive odd numbers, we have x i + 1 = x i + 2 for i = 1 , … , 1 5 . Or, more generally, x j = x i + 2 ( j − i ) ( 1 ) where i , j ∈ N . It follows that the sum of the sequence is \begin{aligned} \sum_1^{16}{x_i} & = x_1 + (x_1 + 2(1)) + \dots + (x_1 + 2(15)) & \mbox{(by use of }(1)\mbox{)}\\ & = 16x_1 + 2\sum_1^{15}{r} \tag{2} \\ & = 16x_1 + 240 = n^3 \tag{3} \end{aligned} Now, we have been given that every x i is composed of exactly 3 -digits. Thus the lower upper bounds for our cube number are 1 6 ( 1 0 0 ) + 2 4 0 = 1 8 4 0 > 1 2 3 1 6 ( 9 9 9 ) + 2 4 0 = 1 6 2 2 4 < 2 6 3 respectively. This provides the constraint 1 2 < n < 2 6 Let us rearrange ( 3 ) to x 1 = 1 6 n 3 − 1 5 ( 4 ) We can observe that for x 1 to be an integer value we must have 1 6 ( = 2 4 ) ∣ n 3 ⟺ 4 ∣ n . Therefore our values for n must be multiples of 4 , giving n = 1 6 , 2 0 , 2 4 .
So our answer is 3 .
2 . G e n e r a l i s a t i o n
There are multiple variables we can change in the given question. This section will generalise each of variables independently and, in some cases, simultaneously.
P r e p a r e y o u r s e l v e s . . .
2 . 1 d -digit numbers
This is the most trivial generalisation. If the question were rephrased to ask the number of pucelana sequences with d -digit numbers only, what would our answer be?
All that changes in our solution is the constraint on n . For the lower and upper bounds we simply replace 1 0 0 and 9 9 9 with 1 0 d − 1 and 1 0 d − 1 (the smallest and largest numbers composed of d -digits) respectively.
E x a m p l e 2 . 1 . 1 The same question for 4 -digits would give lower and upper bounds of 1 6 ( 1 0 0 0 ) + 2 4 0 = 1 6 2 4 0 > 2 5 3 1 6 ( 9 9 9 9 ) + 2 4 0 = 1 6 0 2 2 4 < 5 5 3 Thus our answer would be the number of multiples of 4 between 2 5 and 5 5 , which is 7 ( 2 8 , 3 2 , 3 6 , 4 0 , 4 4 , 4 8 , 5 2 ).
T h i s n e x t s e c t i o n w a s s o m e w h a t t e d i o u s t o w r i t e
2 . 2 k consecutive odd numbers
If, instead of 1 6 , we were to define an increasing sequence with k consecutive odd numbers whose sum is a perfect cube and ask the same question, what would our answer be?
Our formula ( 1 ) and our constraints for n will remain the same since we're still dealing with consecutive odd numbers of exactly 3 -digits. The only thing to change would be our sum, which will now have k terms. It is easy to see that equation ( 2 ) will now become k x 1 + 2 1 ∑ k − 1 r = k x 1 + k ( k − 1 ) = n 3 If we rearrange and divide by k , akin to ( 4 ) , we get x 1 = k n 3 − ( k − 1 ) ( 5 )
T h e o r e m 2 . 2 . 1 k ∣ n 3 ⟺ p ⌈ m / 3 ⌉ ∣ n for every prime factor p of k where at most p m ∣ k for some m ∈ N
Proof. ( ⇒ ) Let k = p q where p is a prime number and q ∈ N . If p ∤ q then k ( = p q ) ∣ n 3 ⟹ p ∣ n 3 ⟺ p ∣ n . If p ∣ q then find l ∈ N such that l = q / p x and q / p x + 1 ∈ N for some x ∈ N . Then at most p x + 1 ∣ k so k = p x + 1 l and p x + 1 ∣ n 3 ⟺ p ⌈ ( x + 1 ) / 3 ⌉ ∣ n .
( ⇐ ) Let p 1 ⌈ m 1 / 3 ⌉ , p 2 ⌈ m 2 / 3 ⌉ , … , p s ⌈ m s / 3 ⌉ ∣ n where p 1 , p 2 , … , p s are the prime factors of k with at most p 1 m 1 , p 2 m 2 , … , p s m s ∣ k . Thus k = p 1 m 1 p 2 m 2 ⋯ p s m s . If 3 m i is an integer for some m i then ⌈ 3 m i ⌉ = 3 m i = x i ∈ N and thus p i m i ∣ n 3 . If however 3 m i is not an integer then ⌈ 3 m i ⌉ = 3 m i + c = x i + c ∈ N where c = ⌈ x i ⌉ − x i and we have p i m i + 3 c ∣ n 3 ⟹ p i m i ∣ n 3 . And so k ∣ n 3 . □
We can now use T h e o r e m 2 . 2 . 1 to find the number of integer solutions for ( 5 ) .
E x a m p l e 2 . 2 . 2 Let us consider the number of sequences of 1 4 5 8 consecutive odd numbers whose sum is a cube number and with each term having exactly 4 -digits only. It is simple to see that 1 4 5 8 = 2 × 7 2 9 = 2 × 3 6 And so, by T h e o r e m 2 . 2 . 1 , we require n to be divisible by 2 ⌈ 1 / 3 ⌉ × 3 ⌈ 6 / 3 ⌉ = 2 × 3 2 = 1 8 Since we already know ( S e c t i o n 2 . 1 ) that for 4 -digit numbers the constraint on n is 2 5 < n < 5 5 we need to find all n satisfying the inequality such that 1 8 ∣ n . These are 3 6 and 5 4 and so our answer is 2 .
N o p o i n t r e w r i t i n g t h e t h e o r e m , r i g h t ?
2 . 3 Sum equal to n z
Finally we should consider what would happen if we required the sequence to be equal to n z for z ∈ N . In fact, it is nothing too new; we simply generalise T h e o r e m 2 . 2 . 1 as follows.
T h e o r e m 2 . 3 . 1 k ∣ n z ⟺ p ⌈ m / z ⌉ ∣ n for every prime factor p of k where at most p m ∣ k for some m ∈ N
The proof is omitted (it is very similar to that of T h e o r e m 2 . 2 . 1 ).
So, now that we have done all of that, let's try some example questions.
3 . E x a m p l e Q u e s t i o n s
1 . How many sequences are there of 3 2 consecutive odd numbers with 2 -digit numbers only, whose sum is of the form n 4 ?
2 . How many sequences are there of 3 0 consecutive odd numbers with 3 -digit numbers only, whose sum is of the form n 2 ?
Harder:
3 . What is the sum of the number of sequences of 3 k + 1 consecutive odd numbers with k -digit numbers only, each with sum of the form n k for k = 1 , 2 , 3 , … .
4 . What is the sum of the number of sequences of k k 2 − 2 k + 1 consecutive odd numbers with k -digit numbers only, each with sum of the form n k for k = 1 , 2 , 3 , … .