An ice skater is standing with his arms wide, spinning on the tip of one skate. By pulling his arms in, his moment of inertia is reduced to 60% of its original value.
If K is the original rotational kinetic energy of the skater and W is the work done in pulling in his arms, what is the ratio W : K ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Let initial angular velocity be ω i . Then, by conservation of angular momentum, ω f = 3 5 ω i (because I f = 5 3 I i ). Also, we know that W = Δ K . E r o t . So we have -
K W = K i Δ K . E r o t = 2 1 I i ω i 2 1 0 3 I i ⋅ 9 2 5 ω i 2 − 2 1 I i ω i 2 = 3 2
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Combining the equations for angular momentum, L = I ω , and rotational kinetic energy, K = 2 1 I ω 2 , we get K = 2 I L 2 . The angular moment is conserved, because pulling in the arms involves only internal forces. Thus the kinetic energy K is inversely proportional to the moment of inertia I .
Since I ′ = 5 3 I , it follows that K ′ = 3 5 K . This means that the kinetic energy increases by 3 2 K ; this increase is equal to the amount of work done. Thus the ratio is 2 : 3 .