Square of 9's

How many zeros are there in the decimal representation of 99999 0 2 999990^2 ?


The answer is 6.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Jesse Nieminen
Mar 9, 2017

99999 0 2 = ( 1000000 10 ) 2 = 1000000000000 20000000 + 100 = 999980000100 999990^2 = \left(1000000-10\right)^2 = 1000000000000 - 20000000 + 100 = 999980000100 .

Hence, the answer is 6 \boxed{6} .

Toshit Jain
Mar 5, 2017

Squares of 9's:| Let's have a look at some - 99^2= 9801 | 999^2 = 998001 | If we watch closely , in these cases, the 9 on the extreme right is decreased by 1 and is followed by as many zeroes as many 9 preceding it and these zeros followed by 1 | So, 99999^2 = 9999800001 | So , 4+2(obtained after squaring 10)=6 zeros !!

How do you know it works for ALL such numbers?

Pi Han Goh - 4 years, 3 months ago

It works well for squares of all numbers having only 9s. You may use a calculator and you will notice a similar pattern in all! Correct me if I was mistaken !

Toshit Jain - 4 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

You have only shown that it's true for 99^2 and 999^2, how do you know that it works for 9999^2, 99999^2, .... and the rest?

Pi Han Goh - 4 years, 3 months ago

Because the same pattern is followed all through...You may use a calculator! For instance , 9999^2 = 9998001 , 99999^5=9999800001 , 999999^6=999998000001 ! and it goes on... I only observed the pattern...

Toshit Jain - 4 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

Finding a pattern isn't proof.

Here you'll find an excellent example why you shouldn't trust your patterns without proving them:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84hEmGHw3J8

Jesse Nieminen - 4 years, 3 months ago

Like I said earlier, you have only shown that it's true for 99^2, 999^2, 9999^2, 99999^2, 999999^2

But does this work for ALL the infinitely many numbers? If yes, PROVE IT!

Pi Han Goh - 4 years, 3 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...