Squarish numbers

Define a positive integer n n to be squarish if either n n is a square or the difference of n n to its nearest perfect square is a square. For example 2016 is a squarish since its difference from 4 5 2 = 2025 45^2=2025 is a square. Define S ( N ) S(N) to be the number of squarish integers between 1 and N N inclusive. Find positive constants α \alpha and β \beta such that

lim N S ( N ) N α = β \large \lim_{N \to \infty} \frac {S(N)}{N^\alpha} = \beta

Write the answer as ( α , β ) (\alpha, \beta) if it exists.

No such constants exist. ( 4 3 , 3 4 ) \left(\frac 43, \frac 34\right) ( 1 2 , 2 3 ) \left(\frac 12, \frac 23\right) ( 3 4 , 4 3 ) \left(\frac 34, \frac 43\right)

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Calvin Lin Staff
Oct 7, 2017

Hint: The number of squarish numbers from k 2 k^2 to ( k + 1 ) 2 (k+1)^2 is approximately 2 k 2\sqrt{k} . Hence the number of squarish number from 1 1 to k 2 k^2 is approximately 4 3 k 3 2 \frac{4}{3} k ^ \frac{3}{2} . So the number of squaring numbers from 1 1 to n n is approximately 4 3 n 3 4 \frac{4}{3} n^ \frac{3}{4} .

(Slight justification needed, but the idea is there.)

I think maybe you need to multiply all your estimates by 2 2 ?

I don't remember the details, but when I was working the problem out I grouped the numbers by their nearest square, so there were about 2 k 2\sqrt{k} squarish numbers whose nearest square was k 2 . k^2.

This is Putnam 2016 B-2, by the way.

Patrick Corn - 3 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Ah yes indeed. In that range, there are k \sqrt{k} perfect squares that "round" to k 2 k^2 , and another k \sqrt{k} perfect squares that round to ( k + 1 ) 2 (k+1)^2 .

If it's a Putnam problem, then there will need to be more justification in the solution, especially with the "Riemann sum". In particular, we need to sum 2 k 2 \lfloor \sqrt{k} \rfloor instead, and show that it is still approximate. But since k k \lfloor \sqrt{k} \rfloor \sim \sqrt{k} , it all works out (just fill in the details).

Calvin Lin Staff - 3 years, 7 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...