Steiner Inellipse Problem

Geometry Level 5

The coordinates of the 3 vertices of the triangle

are

( 2 , 2 ) , ( 6 , 13 ) , ( 10 , 3 ) \left( -2,-2 \right) ,\left( 6,13 \right) ,\left( 10,3 \right)

The implicit equation of the inscribed ellipse with the maximum possible area can be expressed in this form

a y 2 + b x y + c x 2 + d y + e x + f = 0 a{ y }^{ 2 }+bxy+{ cx }^{ 2 }+dy+ex+f=0

where a , b , c , d , e , f a, b, c, d, e, f are co-prime integers, and a > 0 a>0 .

Find ( a + b + c + d + e + f ) \sqrt { (a+b+c+d+e+f) }

You're welcome to check Calvin Lin's post

5 points determine a conic

or try something else.


The answer is 7.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Vagish Jha
Aug 12, 2014

We can get midpoint of triangle , write it in the form of a+ib , these three are root of cubic equation. Diff cubic we get quadratic equated with zero we get focii of ellipse (marden theorem) . We know the point of contact rest is calculation

Yes, that's another way to do it, Vagish.

Michael Mendrin - 6 years, 10 months ago
Michael Mendrin
Aug 10, 2014

The implicit equation of this Steiner Inellipse is

16 y 2 20 x y + 25 x 2 56 y 140 x + 224 = 0 16{ y }^{ 2 }-20xy+25{ x }^{ 2 }-56y-140x+224=0

which can be partially checked by plugging in the coordinates of the midpoints of the triangle. Thus, the sum being 49 49 , the answer is 7 7 .

An affine transform

x = a 00 x + a 01 y + a 02 x'={ a }_{ 00 }x+{ a }_{ 01 }y+{ a }_{ 02 }
y = a 10 x + a 11 y + a 12 y'={ a }_{ 10 }x+{ a }_{ 11 }y+{ a }_{ 12 }

preserves ratios of lengths and areas. Hence, since the incircle of an equilateral triangle has the maximum area of all possible inscribed ellipses, we work out the coefficients

( a 00 , a 01 , a 02 , a 10 , a 11 , a 12 ) = \left( { a }_{ 00 },{ a }_{ 01 },{ a }_{ 02 },{ a }_{ 10 },{ a }_{ 11 },{ a }_{ 12 } \right) =

( 3 7 , 3 7 , 0 , 3 14 , 3 35 , 7 5 ) \left( -\frac { \sqrt { 3 } }{ 7 } ,\frac { \sqrt { 3 } }{ 7 } ,0,-\frac { 3 }{ 14 } ,-\frac { 3 }{ 35 } ,\frac { 7 }{ 5 } \right)

such that it transforms the coordinates of this triangle into the equilateral triangle with vertex coordinates

( 0 , 2 ) , ( 3 , 1 ) , ( 3 , 1 ) \left( 0,2 \right) ,(\sqrt { 3 } ,-1),(-\sqrt { 3 } ,-1)

that has the incircle with the implicit equation of

y 2 + x 2 1 = 0 { y' }^{ 2 }+{ x' }^{ 2 }-1=0

Once we have those coefficients, we can then apply the affine transform to the implicit equation of the incircle to come up with the implicit equation of the Steiner Inellipse of the other triangle.

The area of the Steiner Inellipse is always π 3 3 \dfrac { \pi }{ 3\sqrt { 3 } } that of the triangle it is inscribed in.

Is using a determinant to work out the implicit equation, as suggested by Calvin Lin's post, useless for this problem, because there are only 3 known points on the Steiner Inellipse? No, it still can be used, if one recognizes that while it takes 5 points to determine a conic, it only takes 3 points if we knew the tangents of 2 of the points. So consider a point which is midpoint between a pair of vertices

( p 12 , q 12 ) = ( 1 2 ( x 1 + x 2 ) , 1 2 ( y 1 + y 2 ) ) \left( p_{ 12 },{ q }_{ 12 } \right) =\left( \frac { 1 }{ 2 } \left( { x }_{ 1 }+{ x }_{ 2 } \right) ,\frac { 1 }{ 2 } \left( { y }_{ 1 }+{ y }_{ 2 } \right) \right)

and then consider another next to it on the line through both vertices

( p 12 , q 12 ) = ( ( 1 2 + ϵ ) x 1 + ( 1 2 ϵ ) x 2 , ( 1 2 + ϵ ) y 1 + ( 1 2 ϵ ) y 2 ) \left( p'_{ 12 },{ q' }_{ 12 } \right) =\left( { \left( \frac { 1 }{ 2 } +\epsilon \right) { x }_{ 1 } }+\left( \frac { 1 }{ 2 } -\epsilon \right) { x }_{ 2 },\left( \frac { 1 }{ 2 } +\epsilon \right) { y }_{ 1 }+\left( \frac { 1 }{ 2 } -\epsilon \right) { y }_{ 2 } \right)

so that as ϵ 0 \epsilon \rightarrow 0 the points merge. This defines a tangent. We do the same for another midpoint, so that we now have the 5 points we need to use a determinant. At this point, it's decidedly more convenient to use a computer, because then, after expanding and factorizing it, we can see that we can eliminate one of the factors, which is ϵ 2 { \epsilon }^{ 2 } . Then we let ϵ = 0 \epsilon =0 , and after simplifying the resulting expression, we end up with the implicit equation of the Steiner Inellipse as given above.

You can also do it by simple coordinate geometry means. First apply (2,2) transform to get neater numbers, then work out centroid and midpoints. Steiner inellipse certainly passes through midpoints of triangle sides, but you can get two more points by noticing that, due to symmetry, any two of the midpoints reflected about the centriod will yield points lying on the eliipse. Now we have 5 points, and we are done. (Oh, and revert our initial transform by translating everything by (-2,-2) )

Ilya Andreev - 6 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

In other words Steiner inellipse passes through midpoints of triangle sides and midpoints between each vertex and centroid.

Maria Kozlowska - 5 years, 4 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...