The four numbers c < d < e < f are 4 consecutive terms of a geometric progression. It is given that c and d are the roots of x 2 − 3 x + a = 0 , and that e and f are the roots of x 2 − 1 2 x + b = 0 . What is the value of a + b ?
This problem is posed by Subharthi C .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
@Timmy: The problem stipulated that the geometric sequence is strictly increasing, so the common ratio has to be greater than 2. If k = − 2 , then either c and e must be positive and d and f must be negative, or vice versa; in either case, c < d < e < f could not hold.
why can't k = -2 ?
Let cd be equal to a Let ef be equal to b let c be equal to z Therefore, d=zr Therefore, e=zr^2 z^2 \times r=a z^2 \times r^5=b By vieta formula, z+zr=3 zr^2+zr^3=12 Solving these two equations, we get r=positive or negative two If r is positive two, we get z=1 from vietas formula therefore, a+b=30+4=34
Denote c , d = n c , e = n 2 c , f = n 3 c are the terms of the geometric sequence. Applying Vieta theorem yields: c + n c = 3 , n c 2 = a , n 2 c + n 3 c = 1 2 and n 5 c 2 = b . From these equation we can find n = 2 and c = 1 and therefore, a + b = 3 4 .
Remember to explain how you solved a system of equations, especially if you have to reject solutions along the way. It is not immediately obvious that n = 2 and c = 1 is the only solution.
Let c = a , d = a r , e = a r 2 , and f = a r 3 . From Vieta's Formulas, we have c + d = a + a r = 3 and e + f = a r 2 + a r 3 = 1 2 . Dividing the equations gives r 2 = 4 , and since c < d < e < f we have r = 2 . Substituting gives a + 2 a = 3 or a = 1 , so our geometric sequence is 1 , 2 , 4 , 8 . Therefore, again from Vieta's, a = 1 ⋅ 2 = 2 and b = 4 ⋅ 8 = 3 2 , so our answer is 3 2 + 2 = 3 4 .
Let the common ratio be r . We have, from Vieta's formulas, that c + c r c ⋅ c r c r 2 + c r 3 c r 2 ⋅ c r 3 = = = = 3 , a , 1 2 , b . Dividing the first equation from the third, we have r 2 = 4 ⟹ r = ± 2 .
But the progression is strictly increasing, so r = 2 ⟹ c = 1 . We have a = c 2 r = 2 and b = c 2 r 5 = 3 2 , so a + b = 3 4 .
let c=A, then d=Ar, e=Ar^2, f=Ar^3
3=c+d=A(r+1), 12=e+f=Ar^2(r+1)
solving the equation r=2, A=1
a+b=cd+ef=(A^2)r(1+r^4)=2(17)=34
*actually r=-2 also satisfy the equation but it give u A=-3, a+b =-306
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
x 2 − 3 x + a = ( x − c ) ( x − d ) = x 2 − ( c + d ) x + c d x 2 − 1 2 x + b = ( x − e ) ( x − f ) = x 2 − ( e + f ) x + e f
So we have that:
c + d = 3
e + f = 1 2
But, like c , d , e , f are consecutive terms of a geometric progression, we know d = c k and f = d k , for some constant k . Rewriting the equations:
c ( 1 + k ) = 3
e ( 1 + k ) = 1 2
So,
e c 3 = 1 2
c e = 4
But, like e = c k 2 , we can write this as:
c c k 2 = 4
So, because each term is greater that it's predecessor, we have that k is possitive and k = 2 , that means:
c = 1 , b = 2 , e = 4 , f = 8
So a + b = c d + e f = 2 + 3 2 = 3 4